The Rise of the Pocket Universe Monkeys: Superman Haters

Welcome back, I’m so glad you could join me today. This week’s incoherent and mysterious blog is a follow-up to my Superman: Movie Preview/Review posts.

Superman has been out for over 10 days now, and it’s been receiving a lot of praise, as well as negative attention, particularly in conservative and right-wing circles. I noticed this when the first reviews came trickling in, but it exploded over James Gunn’s statement about Superman:

“Superman is an immigrant” and that, “Superman was the story of America”.

An immigrant that came from other places and populated the country, but for me it is mostly a story that says basic human kindness is a value and is something we have lost,

These words, coupled with superhero movie fatigue and Snyderverse enthusiasts, have led to criticism of the movie for various reasons, with the main argument being that the movie is woke, and it has turned Superman into a woke character. It’s been hilarious watching them decry Superman for being woke, even though he’s been woke since 1938.

Wait until the MAGA crowd discover that Clark Kent’s son from the comics, Jon, is bisexual, or the fact that Superman fought the Ku Klux Klan and Nazis. They won’t recover from that!

I have no problem with anybody praising or criticising a movie, or any other form of art. However, that statement can only take me so far, because over about two weeks, I have seen and heard some hilarious and ridiculous arguments and comments, especially from people who have ever seen the film. Haters have to hate, I guess.

Having seen the movie and being a fan of Superman, I’m somewhat embarrassed to admit that I find it entertaining to watch conservatives and right-wing individuals overreact to minor and absurd topics. I’ve gathered some of the most ridiculous responses to the new Superman movie for your enjoyment.

Before I go on, you may have noticed the title of the blog included the phrase, Pocket Universe Monkeys. No, that’s not the name of my autobiography, but it’s a term used to describe some characters from the movie. In one scene, Luthor is monologuing to Superman about his plan to defame and destroy him, while they are in a pocket universe that Luthor created.

While Luthor was talking, there were hundreds, if not thousands, of monkeys posting anti-Superman propaganda online; hence, the new term for Superman haters: pocket universe monkeys. I’m talking about people jumping on the “Superman is woke” train.

Credit: Warner Bros./DC Studios

And with that delightful thought, let’s crack on and enjoy reading some foolish Superman-bashing comments.


Credit: Warner Bros./DC Studios

Credit: Fox News
Credit: The Guardian

I’m going to leave you with two things I have said before, plus something new.

1.) So when someone starts talking smack about things that I love or have an interest in (whatever it is), I listen. Basically, it’s so I can determine if there is any truth to what they are saying, because I may agree with them, or to see whether they are just talking through their arse.

Everybody on this list is entitled to their opinion, but sadly, when discussing Superman, they are indeed talking out of their arses.

2.) For the record, comic books have always been political, by exposing readers to important social issues, from Superman being an illegal immigrant to the X-Men fighting for civil rights. Comic books have always been political.

When was the last time anybody on this list read any comic book? Superman has been talking about inclusivity and diversity since 1938; that’s why he’s the good guy; he’s Superman. That’s the point.

3.) Superman is a fictional character who does not exist in real life, no matter how much we might wish he did. However, just because a character is created in literature, movies, TV, or any other medium, it doesn’t mean we can’t relate to them or learn valuable lessons from their stories.

Yes, creators can make characters do whatever they want, because it’s business to make money from them, but also to tell stories. In every single story that has ever been passed on, there is a message. That message could be laced with positivity, or it could be a warning. And Superman’s message is simply hope. From my point of view, what’s wrong with that?

And with that, I’m done. Did you enjoy the comments from the pocket universe monkeys? If you have seen Superman, what are your thoughts? As always, please let me know.

Thanks once again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Remember to read a banned book, please adopt a dog, stay away from red kryptonite, and I’ll see you next week for The Fantastic Four: First Steps-Movie Preview. Take care.


Superman: Movie Review

Because you eat your vegetables and wash behind your ears, you would have realised that this week’s blog post is the follow-up to last week’s stunning Superman: Movie Preview.

Since I was old enough to identify the Kree warrior Captain Marvel (or his replacement) from the other one who likes shouting out his friend’s name, I have recognised that comic books are inherently political, and Superman is no exception. A great amount of my political leanings have come from reading comic books, which bleeds through from time to time, if you haven’t noticed.

Comic books have always been political.

I would love to discuss this further, but important blog posts don’t write themselves, plus, I don’t get paid per word. I don’t get paid at all. Let’s move on to one of the world’s most sought-after literary treasures, a Some Geek Told Me movie review.

Sadly, I had to break tradition to purchase a ticket. Physical tickets weren’t available to be presold for some weird reason, even though it was Tuesday, and the film opened on Thursday. Desperate times called for desperate measures, so I bought an online ticket for the first screening at 11.15 am.

I was at the supermarket about 90 minutes before the film started, where I was rocking one of my two Superman t-shirts. I chose my Superman logo t-shirt, since it’s been an important piece of clothing to me, and I wanted to celebrate Superman.

In the past, I have worn that t-shirt under my suit at my wedding and during the births of UMC1 and UMC2. I also wore it when we buried Indy. I know it’s silly and illogical, but whenever I anticipate a challenging event where I need to be brave and strong, I put on that t-shirt for the strength it gives me to push through and get it done.1

Anyway, I was at the supermarket comparing the sodium content between two items; because I’m cool, when a child I had never seen before walked up and told me that he was going to see Superman that day. I told him I was going to see the movie as well, and that I hoped he enjoyed it. He replied that he loved Superman and proceeded to walk off. That kid was pumped for the movie, and so was I.

Since I had never purchased an online movie ticket before, I had the email open on my phone, so I could show anybody who needed to check it. I felt stupid, because just like all the other times after buying cinema food, I walked straight into the cinema, without anybody checking the ticket.

For an 11.15 am Thursday screening, the cinema was roughly 1/3 full. Superman was here, and people didn’t care about jobs! They played trailers for Predator: Badlands, and The Fantastic Four: First Steps, but also, surprisingly, Peacemaker: Season Two. That TV show had no right to be as good as it was.

As always, let’s go over the rules of the review.

1.) Please be aware there will be spoilers concerning the movie, so proceed with extreme anxiety and caution.

2.) The aim of my reviews are not to rip apart the subject or trash it. If I liked the subject enough to watch it, then I’ll give my honest (possibly biased) opinion.

3.) I’m not a professional critic, so I’m not going to dive into deeper concepts and themes, or the art of filmmaking. I’m just a geek; always have been, and always will be.

Let’s not just stand with our capes flapping in the wind; let’s get on with the review!


Credit: Warner Bros./DC Studios and my local cinema

First things first, did I like the movie? Yes, I mean, of course I did. It was about the world’s biggest boy scout, Clark Kent. I love Marvel and their characters, but I also love DC, so it was fantastic to see Superman on the big screen again, along with his friends, enemies, robots, and a special canine.

Things I liked:

These are in no particular order; it’s more like I remember them, like the names of capital cities or the All Blacks. I appreciated the film’s exposition, giving a very quick history of the DCU, with details referring to how metahumans have existed on Earth for at least three hundred years. In future projects, those events will be revealed to us, I hope.

Another topic is the use of colour. By this, I mean the visuals, from Clark’s costume to Metropolis, to Guy Gardner, the colours were bright and warm. Even numerous scenes filmed against a clear blue sky were, to me at least, associated with Superman.

When you think of Superman flying around or saving people, the images you conjure up wouldn’t be at night or on a rainy day. No, it would be a clear, blue, and sunny day. I’m not a movie expert, because if I were, I would be making movies, but I feel that James Gunn went out of his way to canvas the film with explosions of colours, of varying degrees of brightness.

It is always great to see Clark’s concern for others while various battles were happening. This concern also covered protecting all life, even when it came to subduing the kaiju and caring for his robots. His ethos for protecting and saving life is plain to see when he saves a dog, a squirrel, and anybody else. Unlike Hawkgirl, who casually kills the President of Boravia, Vasil Ghurkos.

In regards to the battles, it was one of my biggest criticisms of Superman in Man of Steel, that even though Clark was fighting another Kryptonian in the form of Zod, Clark came out of the battle with no injuries, like no bruises, broken bones or cuts. The opposite has been true in Superman, with Clark sustaining several injuries throughout the movie, reinforcing that he may have the power of a god, but he is not a god or invincible; Mark Grayson is.

Clark’s interview with Lois was profound because he uttered a magic sentence with five words that sums up a huge portion of his philosophy: “People were going to die!” Just like what Ben Parker told his nephew, Peter, “With great power comes great responsibility.” Clark is arguably one of the powerful people on the planet, so he takes that responsibility very seriously. If he can save and help people, he will. I think David Corenswet did a brilliant job with this, as well as portraying Clark Kent as a developed character.

And speaking of Clark, his relationship with Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) was interesting, since we’re seeing them at the beginning of their relationship. It was a strong point differentiating between Lois and Clark when Lois mentioned that she questions everybody, whereas, as she explains, Clark thinks everybody is beautiful. For me, at least, it wasn’t that Lois was falling in love with Superman; she was falling in love with Clark. That is a massive difference.

For this middle-aged crybaby, I thought the scene was beautiful and that Brosnahan gave a strong performance about a strong woman, who was dating a very strange man. I also thought it was spot on with Lois, as Brosnahan was detailing the news story to Perry White (Wendell Pierce), as Metropolis was getting ripped in half because of the black hole/rift.

When I explained to my wife that Nicholas Hoult was going to play Lex Luthor, she responded by saying she couldn’t take him seriously, because she could only see him as Beast from the Prequel X-Men films. Having said that, and seen the film, Hoult was outstanding. One of the interesting aspects of Luthor’s personality is that, from his perspective, he was king of the world until an alien freak show turned up and stole his spotlight and attention.

Hoult did a marvellous job at displaying Luthor’s brilliance and intellect, as well as his rage, narcissism, being a master manipulator, and his utter disregard for anybody other than himself. Luthor is Clark’s opposite, in every conceivable way; that’s why he is such a great villain. Clark cares, while Luthor does not, and Hoult nailed this. You could feel the contempt and hatred radiating from Hoult’s Luthor towards Superman. He was sadistic.

The top ten richest people in the world, Elon Musk, Larry Ellison, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Bernard Arnault, Larry Page, Warren Buffett, Steve Ballmer, Sergey Brin, and Jensen Huang, have a combined total of at least US$2,009,500,000,000 ($2.009 trillion). It’s sad that with all of this wealth, not one of these people has become Batman; however, it’s a miracle that no one has become Lex Luthor, though Musk seems to be walking down that path.

I’ve always liked the character of Michael Holt, aka Mister Terrific. Since his first appearance in 1997, Holt has become a much-loved icon with DC and the wider world of comic books. Supposedly, he’s the third-smartest person on the planet, and Edi Gathegi was amazing at displaying Holt’s intelligence and morality. People have said that he stole every scene, and I have to admit, his no-nonsense attitude was funny when compared to Guy and Clark. He was the breakout star of the film.

Nathan Fillion was Guy Gardner personified, and I loved his “upgrade” comment and his haircut argument with Lois. It was very on brand for Guy to be a jerk, especially tossing Boravian tanks around, while giving them the finger. Classy.

I could be wrong about this, but watching Anthony Carrigan’s Metamorpho was like watching the alien from John Carpenter’s The Thing. I’ve said this before, but Metamorpho is a criminally underrated character, so it was satisfying to see him using his quirky powers.

I know introducing Krypto the Superdog could be considered corny, and it is, but like it or not, Krypto is a big part of the Superman mythos. Long-time readers will know my connection to Krypto, so I surprised myself by not crying; I was just happy to see him. They did an amazing job of creating a CGI flying dog.

There’s more positive things I could talk about, like Clark acknowledging that his real parents were Jonathan and Martha Kent, the children of Jarhanpur calling out for Superman’s help, the anti-war and pro-immigrant themes, the Boravia and Jarhanpur situation (Israel and Palestine), but it boils down to this: Superman is something that Clark can do. You can take away Superman’s powers, but you still have Clark’s ideals and philosophy. That’s what makes him super.

Things I disliked:

This is difficult because it feels like I’m nitpicking, but no film, ever, is 100% perfect from start to finish, and Superman is no exception. For example, even though I love the Star Wars films, there are still issues with them.

I have previously voiced my admiration for Superman & Lois, it was a phenomenal TV show. I enjoyed Tyler Hoechlin’s Superman, but I enjoyed his Clark Kent even more. At home with his wife, Lois, he would still wear his glasses because, even though he didn’t need them to see, the glasses were part of his personality.

Having said that, it was slightly disappointing to see Corenswet only wear the glasses for maybe two scenes in the entire film. Like I said, I’m nitpicking.

I would have loved to see more of the Engineer, or at least see her try to redeem herself. She seems to have been in debt to Luthor, so hopefully she will do that in future projects.

I felt the same with Hawkgirl. Mister Terrific, Metamorpho and Guy Gardner all had their time to shine, but Hawkgirl didn’t get the same chance, or maybe I’m imagining it. Regardless, I would love to see more Hawkgirl’s character.

I also got the impression that the Justice Gang were shoehorned into the film, but at the same time, I understand why.

There were two scenes that I found odd. The first was when the giant kaiju appeared, and the citizens of Metropolis were running in panic. I could almost picture Gunn shouting, “Action!” It felt humorous and unconvincing to me.

The second scene was when Krypto sat on Lois’ lap. It was obvious that nothing was actually on Brosnahan’s lap and that she was talking to thin air since Krypto would have been added in post-production. It was strange.

I’m being overly critical by nitpicking in this section. I enjoyed the film too much to find any more faults, as I realise I’m just being pedantic now.

So, what about my preview questions?

  • Will the plot make sense, or will it be riddled with holes? The plot did make sense, though it did feel rushed. The pocket dimension and the tensions between Boravia and Jarhanpur could have done with some more explanation.
  • Will any of the other superheroes be meeting Superman for the first time? From what I saw, Mister Terrific, Guy Gardner, and Hawkgirl had all met Superman before, while Metamorpho met him for the first time in the film.
  • How long have Clark and Lois been a couple? You could debate that Clark and Lois have known each other for about three years, but they have only been together for three months.
  • Will there be references to other superheroes? Though they were not all superheroes, we had Maxwell Lord (Sean Gunn), Bradley Cooper (Jor-El), Angela Sarafyan (Lara Lor-Van), Peacemaker (John Cena), and Rick Flag Snr from Creature Commandos (Frank Grillo), along with several famous voice acting roles, especially with the Fortress of Solitude robots. Here’s a shout-out to the Gotham City road sign!
  • With the inclusion of several superheroes, will Superman be a supporting cast member in his own movie? Upon further reflection, I would say no, he was not a supporting cast member. Gunn did an excellent job of balancing this with the other characters, but Clark was still the main attraction.
  • Will adding Krypto turn the movie into a spoof or comedy? Yes, adding Krypto did make it a bit corny and silly. However, that automatically did not make it a negative thing; it just made it more comic-accurate.
  • How will Krypto be introduced? Krypto is introduced within the first four minutes of the film. Later on, I thought Clark was vague about how Krypto came to Earth, which I thought was odd. Having said that, there’s a reason that Clark did not explain that information to the audience.
  • What is Lois’ relationship with Krypto? Lois first meets Krypto at Clark’s parents’ house, and is surprised that he has a dog, as she knew nothing about it.
  • Do Clark and Lois live with each other? After the scene in Lois’ apartment, I would have to say they do not live with each other.
  • Will there be a Supergirl cameo or reference? Good question. We had to wait until the end of the film for the twist: Clark was only dog-sitting Krypto because his owner was partying on a planet that orbits a red star. Krypto’s owner is Kara Zor-El, aka Supergirl. It’s nice that Clark still has a connection with Krypto, even though Krypto is not his dog. I can imagine that Krypto’s origin story will be linked with Kara’s, which will be explored in Supergirl, due to be released in 2026.
  • Will Luthor be a pawn for another villain, or is he the one in control? Luthor was the puppet master in this film, with nobody controlling him. I mean, Luthor couldn’t even control Luthor.
  • How many different villains will there be in the film? There were several villains for the heroes to handle. We had Lex Luthor, the Engineer, the President of Boravia, and Ultraman, who wore the Hammer of Boravia suit. I need to add two other villains that slid under the radar to a certain extent. When Ultraman was introduced in the trailers, fans assumed that “Ultraman” could have been Ultraman from Earth-3, the home world of the Crime Syndicate. It was interesting that after laying breadcrumbs throughout the film, Luthor revealed that Ultraman was a failed clone of Superman. With that revelation, it was obvious that Gunn had hidden Bizarro in plain sight, similar to Bizarro from Superman & Lois. The second secret villain was Clark’s comment to Lois about why he was not going to help the Justice Gang with the fight outside her apartment. He said that it was a dimensional imp, which fans will know as Mister Mxyztplk.
  • How will Superman inspire the audience? That’s a hard question to answer. I can’t answer on behalf of society, however, people posting positive content before and after the film gives me hope about this. In my February blog about Superman, the character reminded me that I can be a better person; I just need to try harder. I had forgotten a lot of Clark’s qualities, so I’m reinvesting them in myself. Clark’s speech to Luthor at the end of the film was…well, super. It defines his character.
  • Will David Corenswet’s portrayal of Clark Kent be Pre-Crisis or Post-Crisis Clark? I would say that Corenswet’s Clark Kent was definitely a Post-Crisis Clark, which does offer a difference from Christopher Reeve’s Pre-Crisis Clark.
  • Does Krypto survive? Yes! How It Should Have Ended predicted a darker outcome for him, along with Clark looking for Krypto, but he survived!
  • How does Lois cope knowing her superhero boyfriend is a target for Luthor and others? I don’t know why I asked that question, so I’m unsure how to answer it. On one hand, she was thinking about breaking up with Clark, while on the other, she recruited Mister Terrific to locate and save Clark, as well as Metropolis, risking her own life in the process.
  • How does Clark manage that Superman is a global hero, and not just an American? The Boravia/Jarhanpur conflict highlighted this. In Clark’s mind, Superman belongs to the world, not just one country. By stopping a war, Clark was no longer a neutral player; he had chosen a side. This speaks volumes about his character. Over the years, various storylines have explored the theme of Superman’s identity and role in the world. This culminated in the Pre-52 reboot, where Superman (not Clark Kent) renounced his American citizenship. He realised that as Superman, he was needed to help people everywhere, regardless of their sexuality, religion, or nationality. By renouncing his citizenship, he aimed to avoid being controlled by the U.S. government. Clark knew Superman was more than an American hero; he was a hero to everybody, from the Ivory Coast, Romania, Peru, Iran, Canada, Vietnam, and even New Zealand. James Gunn just reinforced that Superman belongs to the world, and not just one country.
  • Can I bring my 10-year-old and 7-year-old boys to the film and not regret it? I wanted to take UMC1 and UMC2 to see it, because my dad took me to Superman IV: The Quest for Peace at the cinema. I wanted to watch Superman first, so I would know what to expect. The first issue was when the kaiju was killed; UMC2 would be EXTREMELY upset with that. He hates that people kill and eat squids, so killing a CGI kaiju would turn him into John Wick. He would have been rooting for the kaiju. The other point was when Luthor murdered the Metropolis native. Because of this, I thought UMC1 would be able to see it, but that wouldn’t be fair to UMC2. However, it was a moot point because they both wanted to see Elio instead.

If you’re a movie fan, then Superman may come off as silly and corny, or even predictable. However, if you’re a comic book fan, then you will love this film because it is very comic book accurate. I enjoyed seeing Clark flying around saving people, and being a dork so much, that I can only offer this praise for the film: I don’t have to see it again, but I want to see it again. I’m starting a new job this week, so after I get paid, I’ll go and see Superman for a second time.

So, should you go and see Superman? If you don’t know who to believe after reading various reviews about the film, whether they are praising or trashing Superman, don’t trust anybody. Go watch it so you can judge yourself. Please tell me your thoughts about it, I would love to know.

Thanks once again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, stay away from red solar radiation, and I’ll see you next week for an unplanned blog. Mysterious, isn’t it?


1 I graduated university wearing a black Superman t-shirt underneath my graduation gown, but I also wore Superman cufflinks to my wedding.

Superman: Movie Preview

And I’m back in the room. My winter break is over, after staring into the cold abyss of a New Zealand winter, and I have emerged with my phalanges still cold. However, there is no time to settle and decry winter’s embrace; no, someone must continue the long struggle of producing inadequate writing for the faceless public, and that burden falls upon my scrawny shoulders.

In my mission to view more comic book movies at the cinema, my next project is not a Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) film; I’m as shocked as you. My last preview/review was in May with Thunderbolts*, but this time, we are headed into the DC Universe (DCU), which is the rebooted and rebranded version of the DC Extended Universe (DCEU).

The movie in question is Superman, which is the first cinematic entry of the DCU’s Chapter One: Gods and Monsters phase.1 The film’s working title was Superman: Legacy, but “Legacy” was dropped in early 2024, so the title became Superman.

This, of course, can not be confused with 1978’s Superman, starring Christopher Reeve and Gene Hackman. The difference is that the 1978 movie is known as Superman, but technically, it was marketed as Superman: The Movie. Facts matter, ladies and gentlemen, facts matter.

As per tradition, I would have purchased a ticket to an early screening to avoid spoilers, to give myself enough time to write the review, and because I’m a geek. That being the case, I haven’t got a ticket because they don’t go on sale until Tuesday, 8th July, at 12 pm (NZ time). You can bet that I’ll be at the cinema at 12.05 pm to buy a ticket, though! Since it’s the only cinema in town, I may have to look at buying shares in the business because of the amount of money I have spent there.

I have previously discussed Superman in February of this year, and since his introduction in Action Comics #1 in 1938, Superman has entered our lexicon and consciousness, the world over. I’m not going to launch into a speech about who Superman/Clark Kent/Kal-El is, or who they are to me or you; that would take too long, considering this blog post is about his movie, not an analysis of his character.

However, in saying that, Clark means a lot to me. A lot.

As you can guess from the title, Superman heralds the return of Kal-El to the big screen. The film was written and directed by James Gunn, with an estimated budget of US$225 million, which is, to be honest, quite steep by today’s standards. I’m not smart enough to know whether that’s a possible or negative thing.

I’ve seen the teaser trailer and various trailers for the film, and if I’m honest, the teaser trailer was one of the reasons I left my job. Superman inspired me to try to do better. Seriously. That and seeing Krypto, which resulted in the below tweet.

I am also aware of the Pro-Henry Cavill camp, as well as the Pro-Zack Snyder camp, which have been mocking and criticising DC Studios for any shortcomings of Superman, while ignoring any potential positive aspects of the film. This backlash has been ongoing since the announcement that Cavill would not be returning as Superman and Snyder would not be involved in future projects.

Even if Superman earns over $1 billion, wins multiple awards, and achieves a high rating on Rotten Tomatoes, it still won’t be enough for them.

For an introduction to one of my movie previews, this is somewhat subdued. With that in mind, let’s get on with the preview!


Credit: UMC1 & UMC2

Am I looking forward to watching Superman?

As always with this question, the answer is a resounding, YES! Following my stupid commitment to view new comic book movies at the cinema, instead of on a streaming service, watching Superman is a no-brainer.

I’m excited because this is the first time since 2017’s Justice League that we have had Kal-El on the big screen. Yes, I know Henry Cavill also had a cameo in Black Adam, and whatever Nicholas Cage’s cameo was doing in The Flash, but I’m talking about Superman as a main character.

I’m a little biased since I love various superheroes for different reasons; what geek doesn’t? But my first superhero was Superman. As I said before, Superman means a lot to me, and I don’t know if I could ever truly explain or articulate why.

Another reason that I’m looking forward to the movie, as I mentioned before, is that it’s the first cinematic entry of the DCU’s Chapter One: Gods and Monsters phase. We have David Corenswet (Clark Kent/Superman) wearing the cape, Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane, and Nicholas Hoult as everybody’s favourite bald megalomaniac, Lex Luthor.

Rounding out the supporting cast, we have Edi Gathegi (Michael Holt/Mister Terrific), Anthony Carrigan (Rex Mason/Metamorpho), Nathan Fillion (Guy Gardner/Green Lantern), Isabela Merced (Hawkgirl), Skyler Gisondo (Jimmy Olsen), Sara Sampaio (Eve Teschmacher), María Gabriela de Faría (Angela Spica/The Engineer), and Wendell Pierce as Perry White.

Mister Terrific, Metamorpho, and Hawkgirl are some of the most underrated characters in DC’s toybox, so it will be great to see them saving lives and kicking arse. As for Guy Gardner, I hope Nathan Fillion has understood the assignment, because Guy’s infamous haircut is an awesome start.

I have high hopes for the DCU to be a more streamlined version of the DCEU.

The final reason I’m pumped for the movie is Krypto. He debuted in Adventure Comics #210 (March 1955), and although he’s starred in various animated series and films before, along with the lead role in DC League of Super-Pets, and live-action appearances in Titans and Superman & Lois, Superman is his first live-action film appearance. 2

I would often joke about Indy looking like Krypto, now Krypto looks like him. I may cry watching Clark’s interactions with Krypto, but I’ll be ok. Indy was a good boy, just like Krypto.

Will the real Krypto please stand up?

What is the movie about?

According to DC.com, the premise is this:

“Superman,” DC Studios’ first feature film to hit the big screen, is set to soar into theaters worldwide this summer from Warner Bros. Pictures. In his signature style, James Gunn takes on the original superhero in the newly imagined DC universe with a singular blend of epic action, humor and heart, delivering a Superman who’s driven by compassion and an inherent belief in the goodness of humankind.

On my local cinema’s website, it states:

Superman attempts to balance his Kryptonian heritage with his human upbringing in this DC superhero film from James Gunn.

What can we expect?

The running time is 130 minutes, so pace yourself while drinking, since you don’t want to run off to the toilet while an epic fight is happening! I want to take UMC1 and UMC2 to see it, but since the rating is M, I have to watch it first to determine whether it’s alright for them. Don’t let me down, James, don’t let me down.

Based on what I understand about the film and the overall impressions of the DCU, superheroes are already an established part of this world. As a result, we may or may not see any origin stories. Instead of focusing on how citizens of the DCU come to accept super-powered humans and aliens, the film will likely explore how they co-exist with them and the consequences of this co-existence. Maybe.

I can imagine that we’ll see several fights, Luthor’s monologues, Clark’s relationships with Lois, Perry, and Jimmy, as well as the relationships between Superman, Mr Terrific, Guy Gardner, Hawkgirl, and Metamorpho. There needs to be examples of Clark saving a lot of people, but also inspiring people to be better. The message needs to be about hope. Also, the shenanigans that go with training a super-powered dog.

I know it’s a huge amount of pressure, but if the DCU has any real chance of succeeding, Superman not only has to generate a vast amount of money, but it also needs to win over critics and fans. However, if anyone at DC can knock the first ball out of the park, not counting Martian Manhunter, then it’s Superman.

Do I have concerns?

I always have concerns with movies like this, and Superman will be no different. Since this is the first cinematic entry in the DCU, they need to stick the landing with this, especially with a beloved character like Superman.

Here are some of my questions:

  • Will the plot make sense, or will it be riddled with holes?
  • Will any of the other superheroes be meeting Superman for the first time?
  • How long have Clark and Lois been a couple?
  • Will there be references to other superheroes?
  • With the inclusion of several superheroes, will Superman be a supporting cast member in his own movie?
  • Will adding Krypto turn the movie into a spoof or comedy?
  • How will Krypto be introduced?
  • What is Lois’ relationship with Krypto?
  • Do Clark and Lois live with each other?
  • Will there be a Supergirl cameo or reference?
  • Will Luthor be a pawn for another villain, or is he the one in control?
  • How many different villains will there be in the film?
  • How will Superman inspire the audience?
  • Will David Corenswet’s portrayal of Clark Kent be Pre-Crisis or Post-Crisis Clark?
  • Does Krypto survive?
  • How does Lois cope knowing her superhero boyfriend is a target for Luthor and others?
  • How does Clark manage that Superman is a global hero, and not just an American?
  • Can I bring my 10-year-old and 7-year-old boys to the film and not regret it?

There are probably more Kryptonian questions to ask, but I’m out of time and beauty sleep.

That wraps it up for me here, as the only thing left to do is to buy a ticket when they go on sale tomorrow. I’ll wear one of my two Superman t-shirts to the movie, because, well, how can I not?

Before I go, I mentioned this in a previous blog, but I would like to reinforce it. The world is very dark at the moment, but it’s not all bad. There are slivers of hope and light. Keep your head above water and remember to be kind. Your words and actions can help lift people up. Hang in there.

Thanks once again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, always say no to kryptonite, and I’ll see you next week for the Superman: Movie Review.


1 I think Creature Commandos was the first true entry in Chapter One: Gods and Monsters, but that was a television series. Also, the show was a lot better than I thought it would be. It was insane, but fun.

2 Krypto is one of my favourite unlockable characters to use in Lego Batman 3: Beyond Gotham.

My Winter Break continues!

So, if you have been living in a dumpster that’s been on fire, firstly, I don’t blame you. Secondly, you may not know that this is the second week of my Winter Break from New Zealand’s 5th least favourite website. If I work hard enough, it may reach the dizzying heights of 6th; but we have to wait and see.

Temperatures here have dropped to -3°C, which is just so… delightful. That being the case, today’s blog is as small as the charities that Mr. Charles Montgomery Burns donates to, because I need to keep warm.

In other news, I hope Viktor Orban’s anti-LGBTQIA+ legalisation works wonders for Hungary. It’s not like over 200,000 people would ever participate in a Gay Pride march in Budapest, in defiance of said legalisation. I mean, that wouldn’t happen, would it?


Snow in the South Island, New Zealand, Early June. (Source: Gavin Martin)

And that’s it for this week. I’ll be back next Monday for a longer blog because Superman opens very soon, so I need to do one of my world-famous movie previews.

Please don’t forget to walk your dog, read a banned book, and enjoy the last day of Pride Month. I know Viktor Oban, Donald Trump, and Christopher Luxon will.


My Winter Break is Here!

The June Solstice has passed, and now we are heading towards aphelion. For those of us in the Southern Hemisphere, winter has arrived. The Starks will be relieved, as all hope, warmth, and light have been fading away.

Because of this positive and uplifting event, I am officially on my first break of the year. Yes, I am taking two weeks off from running New Zealand’s 5th least favourite website, because it’s difficult to manage low-quality content for the masses.

It’s a bittersweet break since I found out I was not selected for the All Blacks again. However, I recently registered with Hoopla, so my break will involve catching up on a lot of books.


Lake Tekapo, New Zealand, has already been hit by heavy snow. Photo: Supplied / Tanja Clauberg

Just like last year, I need to address two things.

1.) I’ll be publishing another blog post next Monday, but just like this one, it will be greatly reduced in size and length.

2.) I’ll still be posting daily nonsense on Twitter and Mastodon, so that won’t change.

Thank you to all my readers, followers, and subscribers. Whether you are new or old, your support for this vanity project means a lot to me.

Please don’t forget to walk your dog, read a banned book, don’t bomb nuclear facilities, and I’ll quickly check in with you next week. Take care.


We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1958

I was thinking the other day about our finite time on this beautiful planet. We try to use it by developing various skills and spending time with our loved ones. And then there is this project, which I don’t fully understand where it would fall.

Yes, dear reader, one of the worst ideas I have ever had has returned with a vendetta against logic and reason. Some Geek Told Me is proud to present the latest instalment of We Didn’t Start the Fire, where we examine the historical references of the song.

For the previous non-award-winning entries of the song, please see below to be stunned into submission!

 We Didn’t Start the Fire: The Beginning 

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1948-1949.

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1950

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1951

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1952

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1953

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1954

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1955

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1956

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1957

In 1957, there were many shenanigans, so 1958 might be a nice change of pace. So strap yourself in, because we’re going back to 1958! Make it so!


Credit: Collinson & Cunninghame Ltd: Publisher

1958

Lebanon

Lebanon is a country that can be found in the region called the Middle East and has a deep and rich history, dating back to at least 5,000 BCE. It borders the Mediterranean Sea to the west, with Cyprus just 240 km off the coast. Syria lies to the north and east of Lebanon, with Israel and the Golan Heights to the south. Lebanon has a population of approximately 5.84 million people, similar to New Zealand, which has a population of about 5.3 million. The capital city, Beirut, has an estimated population of 2.3 million.

1958 was the year of the Lebanon Crisis, where the country was thrown into political and religious turmoil. At the time, the President of Lebanon was Camille Chamoun, and he was in the sixth and final year of his term.

Some of the issues Lebanon were facing included tensions between Christians and Arab Muslims flaring up; Egypt and Syria had merged to create the United Arab Republic (UAR) and wanted Lebanon to join them; an armed rebellion had formed; along with Chamoun wanting to seek another term, which went against the Constitution of Lebanon.

The problem was brought to the attention of the United Nations Security Council, and one proposed solution involved United States President Dwight D. Eisenhower leading an intervention at the request of Chamoun. Under Operation Blue Bat, he sent 5,000 marines to secure the Port of Beirut and Beirut International Airport. This lasted from 15th July to 25th October 1958.

The legacy of the Lebanon Crisis was that Chamoun did not attain a new term, with Fouad Chehab becoming the President of Lebanon, and a national reconciliation government was formed. Sadly, Lebanon went on to suffer a civil war for 15 years, which killed an estimated 150,000 people, coupled with conflicts with Israel, the Syrian Civil War, the Arab Spring, the October Revolution, and a financial crisis, Lebanon is now identified as a failed state.

US Marines move into Lebanon 28 July 1958. Copyright Life Magazine
LIFE Magazine Cover b/w © Time Inc. 

Charles de Gaulle

Charles de Gaulle remains a famous French icon, over 130 years after his birth. Born in 1890, de Gaulle was a veteran of the First World War, and after the war ended, he stayed with the army. This led him to gain worldwide attention later on during the Second World War, after de Gaulle was promoted within the army and the government, to the point where he was in charge of the Free French Forces against Nazi Germany.

After the war, de Gaulle remained within the government in various roles until 1946. However, in 1958, Algeria was involved in an armed conflict to wrestle its independence from France.

Charles de Gaulle re-entered French politics during a crisis in the Fourth Republic, particularly regarding Algeria, during the 1958 election. He was appointed Prime Minister and granted special powers to address the Algerian Crisis, as many believed he was the only person capable of resolving it.

This led to de Gaulle drafting a new French Constitution, which established the Fifth Republic of France, where he was subsequently elected as the first President of the Fifth Republic. Although Algeria won its independence from France on 5th July 1962, de Gaulle remained President until 1969.

A contemporary equivalent for de Gaulle would be someone who was a war hero and then entered politics. History is filled with such people, however, I’ll go for George H.W. Bush, Bajram Begaj, Hashim Thaçi, Aslan Maskhadov, and Min Aung Hlaing, along with many others.

Charles de Gaulle gives a press conference, 1958. Photograph: Daniele Darolle/Sygma via Getty Images

California baseball

This is not the first time a baseball team has appeared as an entry on one of our lists. California baseball refers to the New York Giants, who had played in the National League, in MLB (Major League Baseball), since 1883. They were based in…wait for it…New York; Upper Manhattan to be precise.

One of their rivals was the Brooklyn Dodgers, who managed to grace the 1955 edition of We Didn’t Start the Fire. At the end of the 1957 season, the New York Giants and the Brooklyn Dodgers left New York and moved to California. They transformed into the San Francisco Giants and the Los Angeles Dodgers, all ready for the 1958 season so they could continue their feud.

After moving to California, the Giants won the World Series in 2010, 2012, and 2014. I’ve stated this before, but I’m not a baseball expert, so for a modern example of a baseball team relocating recently, I think the Oakland Athletics moving to Las Vegas, Nevada is a clear winner.

Giants first practice at Seal Stadium on April 15, 1958. Starting line up: Davenport, O’Connell, Mays, Cepeda, Sauer, Spencer, Thomas, Gomez. Starting Pitcher Ruben Gomez. Credit: Art Frisch.

Starkweather homicide

Alright, here’s a historical reference from 1958 that is still sending ripples through time. Between November 1957 and January 1958, Charles Starkweather killed 11 people and two dogs, accompanied by his girlfriend, Caril Ann Fugate. The victims’ ages ranged from 2-70 years old, with the 2-year-old being Betty Jean Bartlett, Fugate’s sister.

Starkweather killed his first victim on 30th November/1st December 1957, then went on to terrorise the US states of Nebraska and Wyoming. The Starkweather homicides gripped the American public, which had resulted in a large manhunt for the couple. They were finally captured by authorities near Douglas, Wyoming, on 29th January 1958.

After he was found guilty, Starkweather was executed by an electric chair on 25th June 1959, while Fugate was given life imprisonment, though she was released in 1976.

The Starkweather homicides have spawned many adaptations and variations across television, film, books, comics, music, and video games.

Starkweather has been characterised as both a serial killer and a spree killer. The term spree killer is often used interchangeably with rampage killer or shooter. If you’re looking for a modern equivalent in 2025, simply reading a newspaper or watching news videos will help you find the latest incidents of spree killings, no matter where you are in the world.

Casper Tribune-Herald on 30th January 1958, describes Starkweather’s capture. Credit: Casper Tribune-Herald

Children of Thalidomide

Children of Thalidomide refers to the Thalidomide scandal that swept the globe. Thalidomide was first introduced in 1957, under the name of Contergan, and it was a revolutionary new drug. It was marketed as an over-the-counter medication, that could help with tension, sleeping, anxiety, and morning sickness.

Health authorities around the world began to observe three troubling trends: an increase in infant deaths shortly after birth, a rise in miscarriages, and a growing number of babies born with deformities such as heart, arm, leg, eye, and urinary tract defects. A common factor associated with these alarming trends was the use of thalidomide by pregnant women. Approximately 300 million tablets of thalidomide were sold during this time.

By 1958, the Thalidomide scandal was in full effect across the planet. Soon, country by country were starting to stop the sale of thalidomide and introduced legalisation to ban the drug. It was later discovered that thalidomide caused birth defects by disrupting the development of blood vessels in the embryo.

The Thalidomide scandal prompted many countries to review their drug regulatory policies, resulting in enhanced monitoring of these regulations. The effects of this are still observed today with stronger drug regulations worldwide.

In the last 15 years, many drugs have been withdrawn because of safety concerns, which have included Ingenol mebutate gel, Lorcaserin, Ranitidine, Flupirtine, Tetrazepam, Drotrecogin alfa, Propoxyphene, Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, Ozogamicin, and Rosiglitazone, to name but a few.

Contergan tablets. Credit: WDR

So for 1958, we covered a country, a war hero-turned-politician, a baseball team, a spree killer, and a dangerous over-the-counter drug. One of the biggest points about the historical references for 1958, is how these events are still being echoed in 2025.

So that’s it for another week. The 1960s are just months away, but we need to face 1959 first, so hang in there. Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. My accounts on Twitter and Mastodon, are still there, doing whatever the opposite of cool is.

This is a good time to remind my amazing audience that my mid-year break is coming up soon, where I take a well-deserved two-week holiday from running New Zealand’s 5th least favourite website. It’s hard work producing low-quality content.

Anyway, please remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, swipe right on diplomacy, and I’ll see you next week.


Random things my wife is now into

It’s been a while since I’ve discussed my wife and her quirky traits, so I thought I would remedy that. For previous insightful entries about analysing her, please see here about her choices of books, TV shows, and movies.

To set the scene, I shared some ideas with her, but she considered my suggestions and proposed a topic that was far better than what I had originally come up with. Like anyone else, she often talks to me about various unusual topics that pique her interest, and these interests have evolved over the years.

This includes when I’m watching rugby or reading, she will start discussing some new or crazy topic. I love her, but the All Blacks would be playing, and she decides now is the best time to talk to me about her new interest in following Mongolian throat singing, or something to that effect.

I have compiled a collection of her new and random interests, along with the rationale behind each one, presented in her own words whenever possible. Additionally, my wife has noted that she has interests beyond just watching things; these are simply her latest random pursuits. She believes that this makes her pretty cool.

So, without further fanfare, let’s get started!


Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Watching snake eggs hatch:

I think its fascinating and the eggs are soft and just so un-egg like (Molinaro Snake Lab to be precise).

Watching restoration videos:

The rustier the better, I just like all the steps and processes involved. (Chip Channel Restorations and The Fabrick to be precise)

Manufacturing videos:

Like food factory stuff. It’s just great what people have come up with to make life easier and I find it exciting.

Prop making:

I like watching other people make stuff, while I’m making my own stuff. It’s great to understand their thought processes around problem-solving. It’s like you’re working with an arts and crafts buddy. (Rachel Maksy to be precise)

Bardcore music:

I have no explanation for this, I just like it because it’s cool. (Hildegard von Blingin’ to be precise)

British Football chants:

So hilarious, unexpectedly funny and just really creative.

Keith Richards memes:

Another illogical one because I’m not even a fan of his; they are just funny.

Comedy music artists:

Music + humour. What’s not to like? They tickle my brain. I really like Tom Cardy, Rhett and Link, and Flight of the Concords. Also ERB (Epic Rap Battles of History) has the bonus of learning stuff too.

That is just what’s happening with her in the first half of 2025. I’m anxious about what the remaining months of the year hold for her.

Do you enjoy any of these interests like my wife? Is she correct, and agree that she’s cool? As always, please let me know.

This blog is shorter this week, but I’ll make up for it next week because we’re going back to 1958. Yes, Billy Joel would likely be disappointed in me.

Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Please remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, and I’ll see you next week.

Also having two conservative billionaires having a very messy public break-up, at the beginning of Pride Month, via their own social media platforms, is catty, petty, and bitchy. I’m ashamed that I love it.


Peter David: Writing genius

In this week’s blog, I want to discuss the death of another giant of the comics and entertainment industry, Peter David. He passed away on 20th May at NYU Langone Hospital, New York, at the age of 68.

Over the last week, many articles have been written by professionals about Peter, across various media. In saying that, I’m going to offer my humble tribute to a man I had never met.


Comic-book writer Peter David ‘PAD’ attends “Stan Lee’s World of Heroes” during Comic-Con International 2012 held at the Hilton San Diego Bayfront Hotel on July 12, 2012 in San Diego, California. (Photo by Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

Each time I reflect on someone who has influenced my life from afar and has passed away, I feel grateful for the various genres that exist, including comics, television shows, movies, and novels.

I love comic books, and as long-time followers and readers may know, I was captivated by them when I was a boy and have never recovered. Among the many reasons for my enduring passion, one of them was Peter David.

For those of you who have never heard of Peter, he was a proficient writer who had penned hundreds of comics, but also novels, videogames, and screenplays. He had worked for both DC and Marvel, but also added a large volume of work to the Star Trek canon through various mediums.

Peter David was always somebody who was in my sphere of knowledge, even though I didn’t know it. I can’t tell you the first comic I read that was written by Peter, but over time, I started recognising his name and work.

For me, his work on Supergirl, Aquaman, X-Factor, Spider-Man, and the Incredible Hulk, has become immortal, along with his status as a writer. From a comic book lover’s perspective, I enjoyed his stories because they included a collection of social issues, mixed with action.

Peter’s Incredible Hulk #420 may have been the first time that I can recall, reading about a character who was dying from AIDS in a comic book. It was relevant then, and it’s relevant now. It’s been my understanding that Peter’s life would bleed through onto the pages, helping to shape and guide characters.

Through his hard work, Peter also gave us The Maestro, a future evil version of the Hulk, who remains a key Marvel villain, and still a warning about ourselves when we allow our morality and compassion to be stripped away, to gain more power. I still have Hulk: Future Imperfect #1–2 and Incredible Hulk: The End #1; I probably always will.

I always liked his strong female characters, who rarely needed a man to save them, because they were always strong enough to save themselves, as well as other people. He also tried to champion people not just on the page, but also off it, with his views and dedication; especially about supporting creators and many other causes.

Over the last few years, I was deeply saddened to hear about his financial and medical issues. Even though he was living in another country, in reality, he might as well have been living on the Moon.

From Spider-Man 2099 to Talos, to Cyber, to Joe Fixit, to Random, to Fallen Angel, Peter’s characters are unique and beloved. I wish I had the opportunity to have met him, but the universe doesn’t work like that. So instead, I’d like to thank Peter for his amazing literacy work that helped expand the mind of a boy living in a small town, half a world away.

What’s your favourite Peter David story? As always please let me know.

Alright, that’s it for another week. Thanks once again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. I’m also on Twitter and Mastodon, where I bumble around in various echo chambers.

Please remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, and if you had a bet that PSG would win the UEFA Champions League Final, over Inter Milan, 5-0, then you’re a lot smarter than me. I’ll see you next week.


Who, what, and where are the elements named after?: Part 1

What’s a nice person like you, doing in a place like this? It’s not that bad, I think. In a totally unrelated matter, I attended a meeting with all of the administrative staff at Some Geek Told Me to discuss future ideas for blog posts.

The CEO came up with a few stupid ideas, the CFO mentioned a moronic suggestion, and the President of the company suggested a truly idiotic topic, though that’s pretty standard nowadays. However, whenever I need a dumb idea, the Vice President never disappoints me.

Because whatever the Vice President wants, the Vice President gets, so we are now going back to the Periodic Table. Yay! Our last venture into this elemental masterpiece was nearly four years ago, so if you missed it, check it out here before…I don’t have an answer to that statement.

Like me, I’m sure you’re a science fan, so how could you not love the Periodic Table? Created in 1869, by Russian chemist, Dmitri Mendeleev, the Periodic Table is the organisation of the known elements into a table, based on their physical properties, atomic number, atomic valence and their atomic mass.

One day I hope to understand it better, though at this rate, it might be the same time the All Blacks win the World Cup again.

So after reading this strange introduction, you would be forgiven if you’re wondering what is going on with today’s blog post. Other than neglecting my bed, we are going to start looking at where the names of the 118 elements have originated from, with the first part of this pointless exercise looking at real people.

Yes, 13 elements are directly named after real people, however, some different people are indirectly named after elements, but I will rant about them another day. I’m not going to present 13 elements in alphabetical order, as you would expect from this account, but rather in the order you would find them on the Periodic Table. So, without further fanfare, let’s turn the page and begin now.


Image by Daniel Madriz from Pixabay

Curium (Cm): Marie Curie and Pierre Curie

Curium is the 96th element on the Periodic Table, and it resides in the Actinoid group. It’s a synthetic element, which means it was created on purpose by Glenn T. Seaborg, Ralph A. James, and Albert Ghiorso in 1944, at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkley), California, United States.

Curium was named after Marie and Pierre Curie, one of the most famous married couples in science. The Curies discovered polonium (Po), along with radium (Ra) and conducted years of research on radioactivity. In 1903, the Curies and Henri Becquerel shared the Nobel Prize in Physics, along with Marie winning the 1911 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

Pierre and Maria Curie in the laboratory, 1904. Credit: Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Einsteinium (Es): Albert Einstein

Einsteinium is the 99th element on the Periodic Table, and it hangs out just three spaces along from curium in the Actinoid group. Einsteinium is another synthetic element, and it was created in 1952, by Albert Ghiorso, Torbjørn Sikkeland, Almon E. Larsh, and Robert M. Latimer, at the University of California, Berkeley, United States.

Using your amazing detective skills, you would have figured out that Einsteinium was named after, arguably, the famous scientist of the 20th century, Albert Einstein.

I’ve stated this before, but Einstein was a theoretical physicist who researched and published work on the photoelectric effect, Brownian motion and the Einstein relation, special relativity, the principle of mass-energy equivalence (E=mc2), statistical mechanics, general relativity, and many more outstanding contributions to science. Einstein also received a Nobel Prize in 1921 in Physics.

Albert Einstein (1879 – 1955) at home in Princeton, New Jersey, 1944. Photo by Popperfoto/Getty Images

Fermium (Fm): Enrico Fermi

 Since Fermium is the 100th element on the Periodic Table, it sits right next to Einsteinium in the Actinoid group. As you can guess, Fermium is a synthetic element, and in 1952, it was discovered by Albert Ghiorso and other scientists at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. It was created in the debris of the first hydrogen bomb explosion in 1952, code-named Ivy Mike.

Just like the previous two entries, Fermium was named after another 20th-century scientist, Enrico Fermi. He was a physicist, and among the various things he accomplished, Fermi helped construct the world’s first artificial nuclear reactor, as well as working on the Manhattan Project.

And just like the Curies and Einstein, he was also awarded a Nobel Prize, but this was in 1938 for Physics.

Physicist Enrico Fermi, now a professor at the Columbia University, shown August 10, 1945, began experimenting with uranium in Italy in the early 1930’s. His experiments and the knowledge derived from them assisted in the final perfection of the atomic bomb. (AP Photo)

Mendelevium (Md): Dmitri Mendeleev

You knew this was coming, didn’t you? Mendelevium is another synthetic element and is the 101st element on the Periodic Table. It was discovered by Stanley G. Thompson, Albert Ghiorso, Glenn T. Seaborg, Gregory Robert Choppin, and Bernard G. Harvey in 1955 at the University of California.

Mendelevium was named after…wait for it…Dmitri Mendeleev! Mendeleev was the architect of the modern Periodic Table, and he did this by organising the elements into a table, based on their physical properties, like atomic number, atomic valence and atomic mass.

One remarkable aspect of Mendeleev’s Periodic Table is that he organised the elements in a way that allowed him to predict the existence of undiscovered elements by leaving gaps for them. History shows that his predictions were accurate with the later discoveries of germanium, gallium, and scandium.

Original: Unknown author
Upload: Germansociety2014/Wikicommons

Nobelium (No): Alfred Nobel

As we march along the Actinoid group, we come across the 102nd element: Nobelium. Nobelium’s discovery seems to me, a bit odd. Scientists in Sweden announced the discovery of the element in 1957, but over the years, other sources have cited different years, such as 1958, 1963, and 1966, for the discovery. I don’t know who discovered nobelium first, because it may depend on who you talk to.

What isn’t up for debate is who nobelium was named after. Alfred Nobel was an inventor, engineer, businessman, and chemist who gave the world dynamite, gelignite, ballistite and the detonator, among other things. Nobel bequeathed his fortune to create a foundation to annually recognise people’s achievements for the benefit of humankind. Today, we know them as the Nobel Prizes.

Alfred Nobel. Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

Lawrencium (Lr): Ernest Lawrence

Lawrencium is the 103rd element of the Periodic Table, and like the others on this list, it’s another synthetic element. Similar to nobelium, lawrencium has been wrapped up in multiple claims of discovery. However, the earliest record of the discovery was in 1961, at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, by Albert Ghiorso and a team of scientists.

Lawrencium was named after Ernest Lawrence, who was an accelerator physicist. He invented the cyclotron, which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1939, as well as worked on the Manhattan Project. He was also the founder of two laboratories, which were named in his honour after his death: the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

Ernest Lawrence is perhaps best known for the invention of the cyclotron. Credit: LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY

Rutherfordium (Rf): Ernest Rutherford

As a New Zealander, this synthetic element has a special place in our rugby-obsessed hearts. Rutherfordium is the 104th element on the Periodic Table, and it’s a transition metal. Like the two previous entries, Rutherfordium has some controversy around its discovery. Whether it was discovered in 1964 by the Soviets or 1969 by the Americans, Rutherfordium only has a half-life of about 48 minutes.

Rutherfordium is the only element named after a New Zealander; my man, Ernest Rutherford. In 1908, Rutherford received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his research into the disintegration of elements and the chemistry of radioactive substances. He is also known as “the father of nuclear physics”, for his experiments that proved that the atom is made up of empty space, except for a small positively charged centre.

Rutherford proposed the term “nucleus” to describe the dense, positively charged core of an atom, thus giving him the title of “splitting the atom”, and the New Zealand $100 note was never the same.

Lord Rutherford’s pioneering research on radioactivity and the atom cemented his place as one of the greatest scientists of the 20th century. Credit: Bain News Service.

Seaborgium (Sg): Glenn T. Seaborg

It may sound like an alloy from Star Trek, but I promise you it’s not. The 106th element on the Periodic Table is seaborgium, and it’s yet another synthetic element. If I have this correct, both Soviet and American scientists discovered seaborgium, independently from each other in 1974, so its another controversy surrounding the discovery.

As for the naming of the element, that is simple. Seaborgium was named after the chemist, Glenn T. Seaborg. Seaborg helped to discover 10 elements, plutonium, americium, curium, berkelium, californium, einsteinium, fermium, mendelevium, nobelium and the final one, element 106; which was eventually named seaborgium.

He also won various awards, including the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1951. Seaborg was responsible for adding the Actinoids strip on the Periodic Table. Cool.

Glenn T. Seaborg, 1968.
Courtesy of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission; photograph, Westcott

Bohrium (Bh): Niels Bohr

Sitting next to seaborgium in the transition metal group, we have the 107th element: Bohrium. There seems to be a trend happening because bohrium also has dual discoveries, with a Soviet team in 1976, as well as a German team in 1981.

People can argue about who discovered what element and when, but bohrium could have only been named after one person: Niels Bohr. Bohr was a Danish physicist, who also dabbled with philosophy. His contributions to science include atomic structure, nuclear fission, and quantum mechanics, but he also won the 1922 Nobel Prize in Physics.

The Niels Bohr Institute, at the University of Copenhagen is also named after him.

Niels Bohr, 1922. Credit: AB Lagrelius & Westpha

Meitnerium (Mt): Elise “Lise” Meitner

Meitnerium is the 109th element on the Periodic Table and another synthetic element. It was discovered by Gottfried Münzenber and Peter Armbruster at the GSI Heavy Ion Research Laboratory in Darmstadt, Germany in 1982.

There are only two elements on the Periodic Table named after real women, curium with Marie Curie, and the second is meitnerium, which was named after Lise Meitner. Meitner was a physicist who helped to discover the element protactinium, along with other discoveries like the Auger−Meitner effect and nuclear fission. She won the Max Planck Medal in 1949, the Enrico Fermi Award in 1966, and many other awards.

Credit: NY Times

Roentgenium (Rg): Wilhelm Röntgen

The 111th element is roentgenium, and it’s another transition metal. Just like meitnerium, roentgenium was created at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research Laboratory, by Peter Armbruster and Gottfried Münzenberg, but this time in 1994.

Roentgenium was named after the physicist Wilhelm Röntgen, sometimes spelt as Wilhelm Roentgen. Through his work, Röntgen detected a form of electromagnetic radiation with a wavelength shorter than those of ultraviolet rays and longer than those of gamma rays.

This radiation became known as X-ray or Röntgen radiation. This discovery meant that in 1901, he was awarded the very first Nobel Prize in Physics.

Photograph of Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen. Credit: Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Copernicium (Cn): Nicolaus Copernicus

We are nearly at the end of the list, with only two to go! Copernicium is the 112th element and once again, was discovered at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research. In 1996, a team led by Sigurd Hofmann and Victor Ninov worked for two weeks smashing lead with a beam of zinc ions, that were traveling at 30,000 km per second. The result of this experiment was the creation of a few atoms of copernicium.

If you’re a fan of space or astronomy, you may already know who I’m going to discuss. Copernicium was named after Nicolaus Copernicus, public enemy #1 for Flat Earthers. Copernicus was born in 1473 and achieved a lot in his life, which involved the fields of translation, medicine, economics, mathematics, laws, and diplomacy, but the main thing that he is still known for 500 years later, is his discoveries in astronomy.

Nicolaus Copernicus is often referred to as the father of modern astronomy due to his groundbreaking work, which demonstrated that not only is Earth a planet, but that other planets also orbit the Sun each year. In addition to this discovery, Copernicus explained that Earth rotates daily on its own axis. He also noted that very gradual changes in the direction of this axis are responsible for the precession of the equinoxes.

His model of the solar system is known as the Heliocentric system, which has the Sun at the centre, as opposed to the Geocentric model, which places the Earth at the centre.

Nicolaus Copernicus portrait from Town Hall in Toruń, 1580. Credit: Heritage Image Partnership Ltd/Alamy

Oganesson (Og): Yuri Oganessian

We have spent some time hanging out with the Actinoids and transition metals, but now we need to drift to the right, to visit the Noble Gases. Oganesson is the 118th and latest element to be added to the Periodic Table. It was created by a joint team of Russian and American scientists in 2002, at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Russia.

Oganesson has three cool things going for it. It has the highest atomic number and highest atomic mass of all known elements, it was only formally named as late as 2016, and it’s the second element to be named after a living person, with the first being seaborgium and Glenn T. Seaborg.

And so, for the final time today, Oganesson was named after Yuri Oganessian, a nuclear physicist. His research on superheavy elements led him to help in the discovery of bohrium, meitnerium, hassium, darmstadtium, roentgenium, and copernicium. Oganesson has also been awarded the Lomonosov Gold Medal in 2017, and the Demidov Prize in 2019.

Credit: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

With the other 105 elements on the Periodic Table, their names will hopefully be explained upon multiple entries on this popular and well-respected website.

So that’s it for another blog post and another week. Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Please remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, avoid breaking the spacetime continuum whenever possible, and I’ll see you next week.


Tour of the Solar System: Triton

One of the many reasons I started this vanity project, was an ill-conceived idea of promoting science literacy. Indeed, I don’t talk enough about science, but every 6-8 weeks, the world’s least asked-for tour, much like a zombie, is resurrected, bumbling and stumbling, stumbling and bumbling into the world.

Yes, search your feelings, you know it to be true! Some Geek Told Me’s Tour of the Solar System is back, with another insightful profile on one of our distant neighbours.

If by a cruel twist of fate you haven’t read any of the previous entries, here is the magnificent list:

1.) Meet the Family

2.) The Sun

3.) Planets vs. Dwarf planets

4.) Mercury

5.) Venus

6.) Earth

7.) The Moon

8.) Mars

9.) The Asteroid Belt

10.) Ceres

11.) Jupiter

12.) The Galilean moons

13.) Saturn

14.) Titan

15.) The Moons of Saturn

16.) Uranus

17.) Titania

18.) The Moons of Uranus

19.) The Literary Moons of Uranus

20.) Neptune

This is our 21st entry, so without being invited to a dodgy 21st birthday with tequila shots, let’s welcome the new entry into the fold, Triton, where it can proudly stand with The Moon, Titan, and Titania. Cool.


Voyager 2 image of Triton showing the south polar region with dark streaks produced by geysers visible on the icy surface. Credit: NASA/JPL

If you’re a Marvel fan, you would have recognised the name Triton from the Inhumans. He’s the green guy who can breathe underwater, if you don’t already know. Sorry, it can be a surprise that some people don’t know things like that.

Triton and his namesake share a similar quality; they are both quite odd. Neptune has 16 known moons, and Triton is the largest. It has a diameter of 2,710 km, which is roughly the distance between London to Moscow. Triton is the seventh-largest moon in the Solar System, as well as being Neptune’s largest moon. It’s larger than Pluto, just don’t mention it because Pluto is still sensitive about being kicked out of the planet club.

Triton was discovered by William Lassell, on 10th October 1846, a mere 17 days after the discovery of Neptune. As we have already established Triton was not named after a comic book character, but rather the standard way, after a Greek god. Triton was the son of Poseidon (Greek)/Neptune (Roman), the god of the seas and oceans. Oh, if you’re wondering if Poseidon was like his big brother Zeus, by having a wandering eye and not being faithful, then you would be correct.

Triton orbits Neptune at around 354,800 km, which is closer than what the Moon orbits Earth. In addition to this, generally speaking of course, Triton’s distance to the Sun is about 4.3 billion km, which means it takes the Sun’s light about 4 hours to travel that distance to Triton. 4.3 billion km in 4 hours? That’s almost as fast as it takes UMC1 and UMC2 to trash their bedroom.

Do you remember when I said Triton is quite odd? Well, Triton’s orbit and rotation are great examples of this. Among all of the large moons within the Solar System, Triton has the distinctive honour of being the largest moon to have a retrograde orbit around its planet. If you remember from previous tour stops, a moon that has a retrograde orbit, is when a moon orbits the planet’s rotation in the opposite direction.

Triton rotates on its axis every 5.87 days or 5 days and 21 hours, and has an orbital speed of about 4.39 km per second. Triton is also tidally locked, which is when a planet or moon like Triton, matches its rotation period to another cosmic body, like Neptune.

Just like the Moon is tidally locked to Earth, Triton has one side that is always facing Neptune, as it’s locked. If you can somehow survive and live on Neptune, you would only ever see the same side of Triton. I love science!

A lot of the data and information that scientists first used to measure and assess Triton, was made by our old friend, the Voyager 2 spacecraft, as it did a flyby in 1989. When Voyager 2 surveyed Triton, it only managed to map 40% of the surface.

Ok, what else can we learn about the sixteenth-largest object in the Solar System? Triton has some impressive physical features like a large southern polar cap, impact craters, mounds, and pits created by icy lava flows. This is because Triton is an active place for cryovolcanism, with the largest being called Leviathan Patera, which is a caldera that stretches 100 km in diameter. Triton is only a handful of cosmic bodies in the Solar System that has a cryovolcanic network.

Triton’s surface is geologically young and is primarily made of frozen nitrogen (55%), with water ice (15-35%) and some frozen carbon dioxide (10-20%). Some scientists believe that a subsurface ocean of liquid water may exist beneath the icy crust, like several other moons, such as Europa, Enceladus, and Titania. Imagine the possibility of life existing there! Granted, it would be in the form of micro-organisms, but it would still be amazing.

The composition of Triton’s atmosphere is exactly made you would imagine it to be: heavily made of nitrogen (95%), mixed with traces of carbon monoxide and methane. It is about 70,000 times less dense than Earth’s atmosphere. The atmosphere extends to about 30 km above the surface, with clouds can be found at around 4 km.

Because of its insane distance from the Sun, and its 30° axial tilt, Triton has seasons that can last 40 years, which is pure nightmare fuel. Westeros has nothing on Triton. And speaking of nightmare fuel, the surface temperature can get down to an average of −235 °C. This makes Triton one of the coldest objects in our Solar System. Even Captain Cold, Iceman, and Mr Freeze would think twice about visiting Triton.

Some other random facts about Triton include:

  • The geysers on Triton eject nitrogen gas from beneath the surface, creating long plumes that can reach heights of up to 8 km.
  • Triton’s density is about twice that of water, making it more dense than almost any other satellite of an outer planet.
  • Scientists believe that Triton is a Kuiper Belt Object that was captured by Neptune’s gravity millions of years ago.
  • In approximately 3.5 billion years, Triton will come too close to Neptune in its orbit, and the planet’s gravitational pull will cause Triton to break apart. This event will lead to the formation of a ring system around Neptune.

There are more things to discuss and write about Triton, but like always, my desire for sleep is stronger. What is your favourite fact about Triton? As always, please let me know, and I hope the tour is living up to its hype.


Thank you for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. I still write daily nonsense on Twitter and Mastodon, if you want to check it out. Please remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, don’t put tomato in your fruit salad, and I’ll see you next week.