Author: somegeektoldme@gmail.com

Comic book relaunches: The Amazing Spider-Man and Aquaman

On By somegeektoldme@gmail.comIn ComicsLeave a comment

Last week on New Zealand’s 5th least favourite website, yours truly brought up the extremely controversial topic of comic book relaunches. If you missed that sizzling and non-award-winning blog post, you can read it here at your own leisure.

If you’re a street-fighting man or a woman who has boots that are made for walking, you would have remembered that I was going to start showing various comic book titles that have been relaunched, for one reason or another; mainly to point out the insanity of it. This is to welcome yet another ongoing project on Some Geek Told Me, because, well… why not?

You’ll also remember that I said I was going to start with titles starting with “A”, which covers Marvel and DC. This is important stuff to say, because details and facts matter. They matter. Now, because I have a reputation to uphold, and by reputation, I mean a tradition of being pedantic, there are some rules I need to cover:

1.) To be considered a relaunch, the title must be an existing or pre-existing monthly comic book.

2.) The relaunch must be for a monthly title, not for a mini-series.

3.) The relaunch must be a reset with a brand new #1, not realigning itself with any legacy numbering.

4.) With the images I will be showing, they will not be variant covers, only Cover A.

5.) A title can only be relaunched if it contains the same original title name. So Superior Spider-Man does not count. My blog, my rules. Also, I wouldn’t be counting annuals or specials.

That sounds fair, right?! I hope so. With that important and special information explained, let’s get on wth the job of detailing The Amazing Spider-Man’s and Aquaman’s relaunches, plus some geeky statistics to go with it. Allons-y!

All images are courtsey of Marvel Comics, DC Comics, and My Comic Shop

The Amazing Spider-Man

I’m starting with Marvel first, because I can. The Amazing Spider-Man series can be confusing to follow because of many relaunches and the multiple readjustments to the legacy numbering. Spider-Man first appeared in Amazing Fantasy #15 in 1962, and not in The Amazing Spider-Man #1, though The Amazing Spider-Man has been pretty much a monthly publication ever since 1963. 

To the best of my understanding, there have been seven different The Amazing Spider-Man #1s. So, let’s look at our Friendly Neighbourhood Spider-Man’s flagship title.

The Amazing Spider-Man Vol 1 #1 (March 1963)

Cover pencils by Jack Kirby, inks by Steve Ditko. Script by Stan Lee, art by Steve Ditko.

This series lasted 442 issues (430 months/35 years and 10 months) before the relaunch.

The Amazing Spider-Man Vol 2 #1 (January 1999)

Cover by John Byrne. Story by Howard Mackie, art by John Byrne & Scott Hanna.

This series lasted 58 issues (58 months/4 years and 10 months) before the legacy numbering was brought back for #500 in December 2003, and ended with #700, when it turned into Superior Spider-Man in 2013 for 33 issues.

The Amazing Spider-Man Vol 3 #1 (June 2014)

Written by Dan Slott, Christos Gage, Christopher Yost, Joe Caramagna and Peter David. Art by Humberto Ramos, Javier Rodriguez, Will Sliney, Giuseppe Camuncoli, Chris Eliopoulos, David Baldeon, Ramon Perez and Victor Olazaba. Cover by Humberto Ramos.

This series lasted 28 issues (16 months/1 year and 4 months) before another relaunch, a month later.

The Amazing Spider-Man Vol 4 #1 (December 2015)

Written by Dan Slott, Peter David, Robbie Thompson, Dennis Hopeless, Mike Costa and Christos Gage. Art by Giuseppe Camuncoli, David Baldeon, Cale Atkinson, Javier Rodriguez, Stacey Lee Phillips, William Sliney and Paco Diaz. Cover by Alex Ross.

This series lasted 32 issues (23 months/1 year and 11 months) before the legacy numbering was brought back for #789 in December 2017, and ended with #801. These issues were idenitftied as Volume 5.

The Amazing Spider-Man Vol 6 #1 (September 2018)

Written by Nick Spencer. Art and Cover by Ryan Ottley.

This series lasted 93 issues (42 months/3 years and 6 months) before yet another relaunch the next month, for Spider-Man’s 60th anniversary.

The Amazing Spider-Man Vol 7 #1 (June 2022)

Written by Zeb Wells. Art and cover by John Romita Jr. and Scott Hanna.

This series lasted 70 issues (35 months/2 years and 11 months) before, you guessed it, another relaunch a month later.

The Amazing Spider-Man Vol 8 #1 (June 2025)

Written by Joe Kelly. Art by Pepe Larraz; John Romita Jr. Cover by Pepe Larraz.

After 35 issues (16 months) the legacy numbering was brought back for the landmark #1000. This series is currently ongoing.

So, to sum up The Amazing Spider-Man series, after 1,000 issues, we are left with:

  • Seven different editions of Amazing Spider-Man #1, from 1963-2026 (63 years).
  • Six relaunches from 1999-2025 (26 years).
  • Five relaunches from 2014-2025 (11 years).
  • Four relaunches from 2015-2025 (10 years).
  • Three relaunches from 2018-2025 (7 years).
  • Two relaunches from 2022-2025 (3 years).
  • This works out to be a new #1 on average, every 9 years, or 106 months, or 142 issues.1

For me, the most damning piece of information was four relaunches of The Amazing Spider-Man from 2015-2025. That’s a new #1 every 2.5 years, or 30 months. That’s insane. I know Spider-Man is one of the world’s most recognisable superheroes, but even three relaunches in 7 years is excessive. And after six relaunches, just so we can get to #1000? Come on, Marvel, what are you doing?!

Aquaman

Now it’s DC’s turn. The monthly Aquaman title has been in publication since February 1962, with Aquaman Vol 1 #1, which predates Spider-Man’s first appearance. However, Aquaman has not had a consistent monthly title, with gaps over the years. Like Spider-Man, Aquaman made his debut in another title, which was More Fun Comics #73 (November 1941).

He appeared in several monthly titles until, eventually, he was given his own solo series. Not counting a mini-series, there have been seven different Aquaman #1s, though the title has changed its name during different runs. And with that, let’s look at the King of Atlantis’ relaunches.

Aquaman Vol 1 #1 (February 1962)

Cover art by Nick Cardy. Script by Jack Miller, art by Nick Cardy.

This series lasted 63 issues (199 months/16 years and 7 months) before the title was cancelled, and then relaunched 13 years later.

Aquaman Vol 2 #1 (December 1991)

Written by Shaun McLaughlin, with art by Ken Hooper and Bob Dvorak. Cover by Kevin Maguire and Joe Rubinstein.

This series lasted 13 issues (12 months/1 year) before the title was cancelled, and then relaunched 18 months later.

Aquaman Vol 3 #1 (August 1994)

Written by Peter David, with art and cover by Martin Egeland and Brad Vancata.

This series lasted 76 issues (77 months/6 years and 5 months) before the title was cancelled, and then relaunched two years later.

Aquaman Vol 4 #1 (February 2003)

Written by Rick Veitch, art by Yvel Guichet and Mark Propst. Cover by Alex Maleev.

This series lasted 39 issues (38 months/3 years and 2 months) before being renamed Aquaman: Sword of Atlantis, starting with #40, under the 1 Year Later movement, before ending with #57. It was relaunched four years later, as a part of the compay wide, The New 52 campaign.

Aquaman Vol 5 #1 (November 2011)

Written by Geoff Johns. Art and Cover by Joe Prado and Ivan Reis.

This series lasted 53 issues (56 months/4 years and 8 months) before relaunched a month later, under the Rebirth initiative.

Aquaman Vol 6 #1 (August 2016)

Written by Dan Abnett. Art and Cover by Brad Walker and Andrew Hennessy.

This series lasted 66 issues (54 months/4 years and 6 months) before being cancelled and relaunched four years later, in part of the ALL IN campaign.

Aquaman Vol 7 #1 (March 2025)

Written by Jeremy Adams. Art by John Timms. Cover by John Timms.

This series lasted 14 issues (13 months/1 year and 1 months) before being renamed as Emperor Aquaman the next month, continuing with #15.

So, since the first Aquaman monthly solo series, in 1962, we are left with:

  • Seven different editions of Aquaman #1, from 1962-2026 (64 years).
  • Six relaunches from 1991-2025 (34 years).
  • Five relaunches from 1994-2025 (31 years).
  • Four relaunches from 2003-2025 (22 years).
  • Three relaunches from 2011-2025 (14 years).
  • Two relaunches from 2016-2025 (9 years).
  • This works out to be a new #1 on average, every 48 issues.2

In regard to the publication of Aquaman, DC’s model for relaunches has been different to Marvel’s with The Amazing Spider-Man. Firstly, Aquaman has been cancelled several times and then relaunched years later, but also, at least three relaunches have come about because of a company-wide campaign, which reset or relaunched the titles the next month, starting back at #1. The shortest series was only 13 issues, while the longest lasted 76 issues.

Still, just like The Amazing Spider-Man, but for different reasons, Aquaman has had six relaunches, meaning there have been seven different #1 issues. I guess, whatever Marvel and DC do, the other will do it as well; now whether that’s a positive or negative thing is up for you to decide.

Have you ever read an Amazing Spider-Man or Aquaman relaunch comic book? Do you like relaunches? As always, let me know. After those awesome questions, that brings another blog post to a close for another week. Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Please don’t forget to walk your dog, read a banned book, remember that Mogo doesn’t socialise, and I’ll see you next week for something different. Cool.

1 With the statsitics, I have rounded down, not up.

2 Because Aquaman has not been in consistent monthly publication, the calculations are different from those of The Amazing Spider-Man.

Comic book relaunches: Who do they serve?

On By somegeektoldme@gmail.comIn ComicsLeave a comment

So. So, so so, so so. What in the Nine Circles of Dante’s Hell am I discussing today? Well, my very patient reader, I’m going to talk about one of the great loves of my life; no, not pizza. Not rugby either. And no, not Salt and Vinegar chips. At least not today.

No, today I’m discussing comic books, which in itself is nothing new on New Zealand’s 5th least favourite website. As you’re well aware of my love for the medium, there are a few things that don’t sit well with me. And because it’s your lucky day, I’m going to discuss one of them with you.

I say this because I’m a supporter, collector, and reader of comic books. There are so many fantastic things that I love about comic books, hence why I love them. But this is not all smooth sailing for me, as I just revealed, as there are aspects to the industry that, if it were up to me, I would definitely change.

However, the nature of this blog post is not to rant about all of them, but rather to shine the spotlight on one of them in particular: relaunches. If you’re a comic book reader like myself, then it’s entirely possible you already know what I’m referring to. However, sadly, not everybody is perfect, and I know this could come as a shock, but not everybody reads comic books. I know the world is a mixed-up place, isn’t it?

To those unlucky people who don’t know what I’m referring to, I’ll do my best to explain it. With the majority of Western, or at least American comic books, I’ll usually find some special information on the the first page, or the last page, or somewhere else in the comic book.

This information, usually, but not always, displays the title of the story and credits the comic’s writer, artist, inker, colourer, letterer and editor on the same page. However, it’s the bottom section of that page that I want to discuss. This bottom section would list the title of the comic book, the issue number, the month it was released1, and the volume number. And it’s the volume number I want to break down for us.

Now before I go on, let us quickly discuss the quiet part out loud. Comic books are a form of entertainment, so that means they are created by publishers for two reasons: to tell stories and to sell those stories. It’s a multi-million industry, and there’s nothing wrong about an industry that provides people with what they want. To a point.

So, comic book publishers exist to tell stories and to get paid for them. Again, there’s nothing wrong with that; it’s a business, so they need to make a profit in order to pay their staff and shareholders, as well as to pay their bills. Awesome, let’s push on.

Two real world examples of historic relaunches were Heroes Reborn from Marvel in 1996, and The New 52 from DC in 2011. Both of these campaigns gained worldwide media attention. Credit: Marvel and James Bareham/Polygon/DC

You see, a monthly comic book could be trucking along, well, monthly, and the publisher could decide to change things up, for reasons that I’ll go into. One consequence of this can sometimes mean that the comic book could be relaunched. Effectively, a comic book could be on #28, then the next issue that’s released would be a #0 issue, though typically it’s a new #1.

An example of this may look like this: The Adventures of Geek Man Vol 1, August #28, so the next issue would be: The Adventures of Geek Man Vol 2, September #1. A relaunch basically resets the numbering sequence from whatever the previous issue was, like #28, #147, or #584, to #0 or #1. The volume number changes as well, from Vol 1 to Vol 2.

That sounds interesting and harmless, right? Fair enough, right? Ok, so why would publishers relaunch a title? Great question, thanks for asking! I could be mistaken, but I believe there are several key reasons publishers may relaunch a title. Ultimately, it all comes down to money, as with most things.

1.) It’s about a sales boost. Traditionally, a new monthly issue #1 will sell more copies than your standard monthly title, especially if it’s, say, #97, #318, or #874. Granted, the sales boost is only temporary and small, but it’s still an increase. Fans would always love to get their hands on a new Punisher #1 or Wonder Woman #1.


2.) It’s a way to celebrate a new creative team. Back in the day, if a new creative team took control of a title, as in a new writer and artist together, the publisher would celebrate by declaring that the team would take the character(s) in a bold, new direction, but continue with the legacy numbering system. But now, maybe 35 issues into a run, the publisher will relaunch the title from #1, in order to promote the new creative team. I mean, if you have the hottest writer and artist working on a new title, why wouldn’t people deserve to have a new #1 to go with the new team?

3.) To draw in new readers by having a new #1 as a jumping-on point for them. Trying to start reading a monthly title that is in its 300s, 700s, or over 1000 issues can be daunting, so a new #1 can make the title more accessible to new readers.

4.) It’s a reason to flood the solicitations with variant #1 covers. By this I mean, what could be cooler than getting a new Thor #1 Cover A? By getting Cover B, C, D, and every other letter of the alphabet as well. A company could say their new #1 sold 450,000 units, but if they have 20 different variant covers, people are not necessarily buying it for the story; they just want the variants.

5.) If a comic book is getting a screen adaptation, whether it’s for a movie or television show, a publisher can relaunch the title to align it with the adaptation. And what better way than a brand new sparkly #1?

6.) This is an odd reason, but it helps with marketing and promoting trades and collected editions. I discovered my local library had two copies of Captain America Vol. 3, but they were written and drawn by different creative teams. Volume 3 is a lot more accessible than Volume 376, right?

There are other reasons, but to me, these are the top six, though they are listed as I thought of them, and no other reason. However, there is an old phrase that relates to relaunches and nearly anything else:

Just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should.

Now, I’m an old comic book reader, as I’ve been reading and collecting them for decades. And from that experience and perspective, I find the concept of relaunches upsetting. Even though I have laid out the reasons why they happen above, that doesn’t mean I agree with them.

I want the comic industry to thrive and succeed, and I know it’s important to entice new readers; but it’s also important to retain the old readers. So, after reading this blog post, I can only assume you must be asking, “What’s his point?” Another great point, by the way.

The point is that this is the opening salvo of a brand new literary project I am undertaking. What I’m proposing to do is list all of the relaunches famous titles have had; as in giving the title a new #1. I plan on doing this across Marvel and DC to begin with, and then take it from there.

This means that the first entry into this ill-advised venture will be next week. I’m still working out the details, but the blog post will be concerning relaunches with titles that start with “A”, so I’m going in alphabetical order. I don’t know how long it’s going to take, but I’m up for the challenge, and I hope you are too.

And with that, I’m done for another week. Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Please don’t forget to walk your dog, read a banned book, don’t believe what the office is saying about you, and I’ll see you next week.

1 If you buy a newly released comic book off the shelf in June, it would have August as the month. Many comic book publishers release their full promotional solicitations two months in advance so retailers and readers can pre-order upcoming single issues or other forms of the literature.

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1964-1969

On By somegeektoldme@gmail.comIn History, Music, People, Politics

I want to take this moment to assure all of my followers, readers, and haters that Some Geek Told Me is totally committed to providing you with the second-from-the-bottom blog experience this side of an NSYNC Reunion Tour. This includes bringing back one of history’s greatest ever literary projects: We Didn’t Start the Fire. The Bayeux Tapestry has nothing on me.

Yes, awesome readers, even though it’s been MIA since 22nd June 2026, We Didn’t Start the Fire is back with another entry to entice your historical leanings. Because I’m a firestarter, twisted firestarter, I have included a list of the amazing previous entries:

We Didn’t Start the Fire: The Beginning 

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1948-1949.

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1950

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1951

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1952

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1953

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1954

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1955

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1956

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1957

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1958

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1959

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1960

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1961

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1962

We Didn’t Start the Fire: 1963

If this project followed the new FIFA World Cup format, we’d be entering the knockout round, like the round of 32. We are deep into the song now, standing at the precipice of the ninth verse, which actually covers multiple years.1 We have not done this since the start of the song with 1948-1949.

Another interesting point to talk about is the song’s time references, because I have seen both Ho Chi Minh and Richard Nixon back again, grouped under different years. When I get to the reference, I’ll go full geek and explain it. So, there’s nothing left to do but to shake what my Mumma gave me and move on.

Credit: Etsy

1964

There is no entry for 1964, sadly.

1965

Birth Control

This reference is connected to a court case, Griswold v. Connecticut. On 7th June 1965, a landmark decision was reached by the United States Supreme Court that ruled in favour of the constitutional right for married couples to use birth control. This decision struck down state laws like Connecticut’s that prohibited the use of or recommended contraceptives, and violated the right to marital privacy.

The results of this decision meant that birth control had become legal in the United States for married couples, and eventually, in 1972, it became legal for unmarried people.

The legacy of the 1965 decision is still being played out in courtrooms in the modern setting. The 1973 Roe v. Wade case, which recognised the constitutional right for a woman to choose to have an abortion, was overturned in 2022 by the Supreme Court. The result was that nearly half of the states enacted severe restrictions or total bans on abortions.

On June 7, 1965, the court released its decision. Echoing Estelle Griswold’s comment about policemen under the bed, Justice William O. Douglas asked, “Would we allow the police to search the sacred precincts of marital bedrooms for telltale signs of the use of contraceptives?” (Above, Griswold, left, celebrates with Cornelia Jahncke, president of Planned Parenthood in Connecticut.) Bettman, Getty Images

1965 (or 1969)

Ho Chi Minh


Here is the first of our dual references, with Ho Chi Minh being listed as 1965, as well as 1969. On 2nd March 1965, Operation Rolling Thunder started, which was the sustained and gradual aerial bombardment campaign by US forces against North Vietnam. This foreign policy of trying to bomb the Viet Cong into submission did not work the way they thought it would, as the campaign failed to dampen their resolve or stop the transport of resources across the Ho Chi Minh Trail. This policy dragged and entrenched the United States into deploying more troops into the conflict, which history would later call the Vietnam War.

Air Force F-105 Thunderchiefs conduct a bombing run over North Vietnam in February 1966. The enormous “Thuds” were the Air Force’s workhorse during Rolling Thunder and as a result suffered heavy losses.

As stated previously, Ho Chi Minh could also serve as a 1969 reference for the President of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam), Ho Chi Minh. He ruled the country from 1945 to 1969 and was a revolutionary icon who fought against colonial oppression. He died on 2nd September, 1969, which pushed North Vietnam further away from peace with the United States.

Some contemporary examples of Operation Rolling Thunder and the death of a 21st-century revolutionary icon can be seen in Afghanistan, Ukraine, and the air campaign against ISIS, as well as in the lives of Yasser Arafat, Ahmed Ben Bella, Võ Nguyên Giáp, Nelson Mandela, Fidel Castro, and Hugo Chávez.

North Vietnamese President Ho Chi Minh dies, Published September 4, 1969.

1966-1967

Apparently, according to Billy Joel, nothing of note happened in 1966 or 1967. If you listen very carefully, you can hear English football fans screaming about 1966, while in 1967, we had Che Guevara’s death and the Six-Day War, which still influence 2026.

1968 (or 1969)

Richard Nixon back again

We met Richard Nixon back in 1950, and as the lyrics suggest, he’s back! When listing this reference, it can fall under 1968 and/or 1969, and the reasons are connected. With US federal elections, they are held on “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” So with the presidential inauguration, that is held on either 20th or 21st January. Since you get 10 hours of quality sleep, you’ll see where I’m going with this.

The former United States vice president won the 1968 US presidential election against Hubert Humphrey and George Wallace on 5th November 1968; but he was inaugurated on 20th January 1969, thus putting him under 1968 and 1969.

Its sort of obvious, but 21st century equalivanets of Nixon, would be George Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, and of course, the return of everybody’s favourite (insert your own word here____________) Trump.

Richard M. Nixon, right, is sworn in as the 37th US president, taking the oath administered by Chief Justice Earl Warren, left, in front of the Capitol in Washington, DC, January 20, 1969. Outgoing President Lyndon B. Johnson is behind Warren. (AP Photo)

1969

Moonshot

I was born after 1969, but I have talked to many people about the Moonshot reference and their memories of it. Being the clever little bees that you are, you would have deduced that Moonshot refers to the events of 16th to 24th July 1969, especially 20th July.

The above dates covered Apollo 11, the fifth crewed mission of NASA’s Apollo program, but more importantly, it was the mission that would land humans on the Moon for the first time. The crew were Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins, and on 20th July 1969, the Apollo Lunar Module landed on the Moon, allowing Armstrong and Aldrin to become the first humans to walk on the Moon.

Not to be undone, Collins remained in the Apollo command and service module and set the record for human isolation. He spent roughly 21 hours completely alone in lunar orbit. For 48 minutes during every two-hour orbit behind the far side of the Moon, he was entirely cut off from radio contact with Earth, as well as being over 3,200 km away from his crewmates and over 400,000 km from the rest of the human race.

The legacy of Apollo 11 is the Artemis exploration program, with Artemis IV due to depart for a lunar landing sometime in 2028.

Lunar Module Pilot Buzz Aldrin. Commander Neil Armstrong, who took the photo, and the Lunar Module Eagle are visible as reflections in Aldrin’s helmet visor. Right: Aldrin’s bootprint in the lunar regolith. Credit: NASA/LPI

Woodstock

Back in 1969, a music festival was held on a dairy farm in Bethel, New York, which was about 95 km from Woodstock, the town that’s the festival’s namesake. The Woodstock Music and Art Fair, or just Woodstock, was held from 15th to 18th August, and became famous for two main reasons: as it became a focal point for the 1960s counterculture movement, and for having music across various genres.

The first was the size of it; between 460,000 and 500,000 people were estimated to have attended the festival. The second was who actually performed, like Sweetwater; Melanie; Ravi Shankar; Richie Havens; Santana; Quill; Country Joe McDonald; John Sebastian; Canned Heat; Grateful Dead; Creedence Clearwater Revival; Janis Joplin; The Who; Joe Cocker; John Winter; Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young; Sha Na Na; Jimi Hendrix, and many more.

The best examples of modern Woodstocks are annual festivals that draw in hundreds of thousands of people each year. To the best of my geek-influenced mind, these festivals include, in no particular order, Tomorrowland, EDC Las Vegas, Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival, Lollapalooza, and Glastonbury. To nobody’s shock, Fyre Festival has not made the list.

I have yet to go to any of these festivals, but hope springs eternal.

Aug. 16, 1969 file photo shows a crowd of about 400,000 people attending the Woodstock Music and Arts Festival in Bethel, New York. Woodstock was staged 80 miles northwest of New York City on a bucolic hillside owned by dairy farmer Max Yasgur. It was great spot for peaceful vibes, but miserable for handling the hordes coming in by car. Fifty years later, memories of the rainy weekend Aug. 15-18, 1969, remain sharp among people who were in the crowd and on the stage. Credit: AP

So for 1964-1969, we covered contraceptives, an aerial bombardment campaign, the death of the President of North Vietnam, the former United States vice president becomes president, the moon landing, and a music festival. This was a weird list because of the skipped years, but hold down your flares, because the 1970s are next, and they are going to mess up the order of this blog.

And speaking of messing things up, let us bring another shambles of a historical lesson to a close. The Warriors and the All Blacks have lost, so my heart is very fragile currently; however, there’s hope the Black Ferns can knock over the world champions next week.

Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. If you like pointless daily facts about nearly anything you can think of, my Twitter and Mastodon are for you. Please don’t forget to walk your dog, read a banned book, go talk to a grandparent, and I’ll see you next week, when once again I try to be funny and fail.

1 In reality, its the remainder of the 60’s.

Star Trek: Dammit Jim, I’m a part-time blogger, not a novelist!

On By somegeektoldme@gmail.comIn Books, Comics, Movies, Television

Hailing frequencies open.

I was trying to think of a phenomenal way to introduce this blog, but as usual, like my mum has always said, “If there’s a complicated or confusing way of doing something, then I’ll do it.” So, instead of doing something inspiring and meaningful, I’ve done this. Wow. Not at all confusing.

Moving on, I contacted the department heads of Some Geek Told Me and finally got them into the same room for a brainstorming session on this week’s topic. As usual, the director of marketing and the head of HR started clashing; like always. The Social Media consultant started waffling on about We Didn’t Start the Fire, while the head of sports trivia did not want to discuss the All Blacks and Springboks. That one is still raw.

However, in most cases, the man-child who sits in the corner and tries to look busy suggested Star Trek. And since the others were too busy bickering, the deadline passed, and Star Trek was selected. Cool.

I can only imagine that if this were written by a professional writer, the lead-in would have been better, but sadly, Horatio, this fellow has only finite jest. This badly drawn-out and ill-conceived beginning is now at an end, so let us begin the ode to Star Trek.

Image by Adam Evertsson from Pixabay

So why is Star Trek the topic of today’s rant? Apart from our resident man-child’s suggestion, it’s the 60th anniversary of the first US broadcast of Star Trek: The Original Series, on 8th September 1966, so what better time to discuss my love of Star Trek? Although it is pretty obvious, I love science fiction. This covers books, comics, movies, computer games, and television shows. And with science fiction franchises, there are many that I like, but I have three main ones: Star Wars, Doctor Who and Star Trek.

It’s funny how society likes to divide us up, as you need to be on one side or the other. In that regard, for personal principles and values, it’s important to take a side. However, there are times when not taking a side is exactly the winning move, like DC vs Marvel, Aliens vs Predator, Coke vs Pepsi, or Star Wars vs Star Trek. For me, I love Star Wars, as unlucky readers of this popular blog will attest to, but I love Star Trek as well. Granted, it’s for different reasons, but the love is still there.

So, why do I love Star Trek? Difficult answer, but I’m up for the challenge. I think it boils down to the scope of it: that hundreds of years into the future, humanity has pulled its socks up and solved many global problems, resulting in an explosion of technology and understanding, as well as meeting our stellar neighbours.

In truth, it’s a nice notion that many of the social barriers we have constructed for ourselves have been/will be torn down to usher in a new age. The world of the United Federation of Planets and Starfleet Academy seems so far removed from 2026, it’s almost laughable. But the intent is there.

I love how the uniforms change for each show and era, yet they remain the same. To demonstrate my love for the uniform, I carried a Star Trek Science Officer badge in the breast pocket of my wedding suit.1

Image by blueprint2015 from Pixabay

I have mentioned this before, but the TV shows Star Trek: Discovery, Star Trek: Picard, and Star Trek: Strange New Worlds have reawakened my love for the franchise. I know Season 4 of Strange New Worlds has started, but me being me, I will need to watch the previous season again.

Discovery was a gateway back into the franchise, and I loved the way the USS Discovery used the spore drive to travel, which, at least to me, was highly creative. Picard was great for seeing old friends, while Strange New Worlds has been a chance to meet new friends and villains. It’s been interesting to have the Gorn as the main antagonists, since they’re an alien species that I haven’t seen a lot of, much like the Orion.

Because I’m on this Star Trek wave, I want to start at the beginning and watch Star Trek: Enterprise again. Though, to be fair, I did watch a lot of episodes, but I never got to watch the entire series from start to finish because comics and football got in the way. Not girls, though; I was living my peak-geek life then, so girls were nowhere to be seen.

In saying that, I’ve never seen every single episode of The Original Series, The Next Generation, or Deep Space Nine. There are massive gaps in all the shows that I want to be filled. One of the biggest connections I’ve had to a Star Trek show, prior to Discovery’s launch, was Voyager. It was another show I never completed, but I gave it a damn good try.

It was on Channel Four, and I thought the premise of the show was awesome and simple; they were transported to the other side of the galaxy, so they were just trying to get home. I was at the right age when it was broadcast, and my love for it spilt over into university. I was extremely cool. And by cool, I mean the biggest geek/dork/nerd. I am still in some ways.

As for the films, I’ve loved them too. I can’t remember the first Star Trek film I ever saw, but I can remember the first one I saw at the cinema. Now, back in the day, my dad loved movies; he still does, but his favourites were westerns, war, action, or cop movies. Science fiction movies were not his cup of tea, but James Bond was. He once took me to The Living Daylights, though I was underage. Mum was not happy, but I was.

I remember Mum and my sister went on holiday early, so Dad and I were going to join them, but I think it was going to be nearly a week later, because Dad had trouble getting away from work. I think it was for a wedding; I can’t remember exactly, but it will do for the story. Anyway, I stayed behind to keep him company until he was free to leave, so we got to spend time together, just as boys.

At the time, and where we lived, we received cinematic releases a lot later than the rest of the country, let alone the whole world. I saw that Star Trek V: The Final Frontier was playing, and I asked Dad if we could both go. As I said before, Dad didn’t like science fiction movies or Star Trek, but he still took his geeky son to watch something he personally didn’t want to see. I appreciated that, because every time I watch The Final Frontier, I think of Dad.

Because he took me to the cinema to see that Star Trek movie, I have seen every Star Trek movie since then: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country, Star Trek Generations, Star Trek: First Contact, Star Trek: Insurrection, Star Trek: Nemesis, Star Trek, Star Trek Into Darkness, and Star Trek Beyond at the cinema.2

Another lesson I learnt from that experience was something that I now do as a parent: I take my boys to the cinema each school holidays, where they agree on a movie to watch, even if I have no desire to see it, but we all still go.

Image by Iris,Helen,silvy from Pixabay

I’ve never been one for reading Star Trek novels; I’ve only ever read two Doctor Who novels, compared to the library of Star Wars books at my command. I can’t really explain the division over that, except I’ve started reading some IDW Star Trek comics. I recently read Star Trek: Red Shirts, which was pretty gnarly. I’m waiting for Star Trek: Red Shirts – Ghost of the 21st Century #1 to arrive now.

I love the vehicles, weapons, and technology, but most of all, I love the aliens and alien planets. Vulcans, Betazoids, Klingons, Romulans, Ferengi, Cardassians, Andorians, El-Aurians, Bajorans, and the Borg; but we also can’t forget the Q, or is it just Q? Its one of the greatest aspects to Star Trek and science fiction in general, the ability of creators to dream of bad-arse aliens, with their cultures, vehicles, appearances, and languages. The mind is a fertile place.

I’m not familiar with every single Star Trek character to have ever graced the small screen, as I’m just a middle-aged geek, not the God of Pop Culture. However, there is one character I know well enough, and that’s the OG miracle worker himself, Montgomery Scott. I say this because…well…if your first or last name is Scott, then at some point in your life, some highly unoriginal person, whether they are meeting you for the first time or not, would have said unto you, “Beam me up, Scotty!” When that phrase is spoken to me, I have to suppress the Klingon in me and embrace the Vulcan.

So, to bring this long and pointless exercise to a close, I just want to state that I love Star Trek, and this wannabe science officer is so grateful for it. And that’s it for another week. Did you like Star Trek? As always, please let me know. Remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, Up the Wahs, and I’ll see you next week because we’re off to 1964.

Hailing frequencies closed.

1 I did wear Superman cufflinks as well. Total class act.

2 I haven’t seen Star Trek: Section 31, but that’s a television movie, plus its on Paramount+, so I don’t know if I’ll ever see it.

The last week of August was rough

On By somegeektoldme@gmail.comIn People

Hi everybody, and how are you feeling today? I’m sorry for interrupting my own weekly rant about science, movies, politics, comics, sports, and just about anything I can think of, to discuss life and death. Yes, 2026 has once again farted in our face and left the party, leaving us to pick up the pieces.

Last week, I was talking about the dwarf planet Haumea, but today it’s something different, though not unfamiliar. Sadly, I have mentioned this type of blog post before, but that reinforces the whole concept of doing it in the first place. Basically, I want to acknowledge the deaths of Dolly Parton, Tim Curry, Peter Cullen, and two special groups of people.

Image by Nile from Pixabay

Dolly Parton died on 25th August 2026 in Nashville, Tennessee, United States, aged 80. As you already know, Parton was a music legend whose career spanned over six decades. She released over 60 albums, including studio, collaborative, live, and soundtrack albums, and sold over 100 million albums, in addition to her acting career in film and television. She also wrote over 3,000 songs. I have trouble saving $3,000.

Apart from her music and acting career, Parton was also famous for her advocacy and philanthropy work, like the Dollywood Foundation. Part of the foundation operates Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library, which, as I understand it, mails one free, high-quality, age-appropriate book every month to registered children from birth until their fifth birthday. Since its inception in 1995, the Imagination Library has given over 330 million free books to over 120 million children.

I remember growing up listening to Dolly Parton on the radio because both my parents liked her and country and western music. As I’m writing this, I’m flipping back and forth, singing between 9 to 5 and Jolene. You have to wiggle your shoulders if you sing 9 to 5 as well. Those two songs are infectious for two vastly different reasons, as I can’t resist singing them.

Credit: OPRY

Tim Curry was an actor and singer who died at the age of 80 on 25th August in Los Angeles, California, United States. It’s been said that how you know Tim Curry from his acting career, which spanned nearly six decades on screen and stage, can say a lot about your personality.

Curry has given us some classic movie performances like Dr. Frank-N-Furter (The Rocky Horror Picture Show), “Rooster” Hannigan (Annie), Darkness (Legend), Wadsworth (Clue), Dr. Yevgeniy Petrov (The Hunt for Red October), Mr. Hector (Home Alone 2: Lost in New York), Herkermer Homolka (Congo), Long John Silver (Muppet Treasure Island), Roger Corwin (Charlie’s Angels), and Colonel Anatoly Cherdenko from the computer game Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3.

He also voiced several roles, including Sir Nigel Thornberry (The Wild Thornberrys), Hexxus (FernGully: The Last Rainforest), Professor Finbarr Calamitous (The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius), Chancellor Palpatine / Darth Sidious (Star Wars: The Clone Wars), and many more.

However, Curry scared the shit out of my whole school and me as Pennywise from the TV mini-series, IT. Later on, as a man-child, I managed to read the book, and in my mind’s eye, when Pennywise was running around in it, I only saw Curry. He had an astonishing talent at playing villainous characters, and I loved him for it.

Credit: Instagram/summainfernoen

On 26th August, one day after the deaths of Parton and Curry, Peter Cullen died, aged 85, in Los Angeles, California, United States. I could be wrong about this, but I believe Cullen had mostly worked as a voice actor. His iconic voice had enabled him to work on many animated shows, as well as movies.

In saying that, some of his most beloved roles have been Thaedus (Invincible), KARR (Knight Rider), The Predator (Predator-he provided the iconic vocal effects and clicks), Monterey Jack (Chip ‘n Dale: Rescue Rangers), and Eeyore (Winnie the Pooh).

However, the role he is universally known for is the leader of the Autobots, Optimus Prime, from the Transformers franchise, in both animated and live-action series since 1984. When I’m watching a movie or television show and I recognise Cullen’s voice, it’s like, “Hey, it’s Optimus Prime! What’s he doing there?!” That is never going to change for me.

Credit: Dan MacMedan

And to close out this uplifting and positive blog post, I also want to acknowledge the victims of the 2026 Venezuela earthquakes and Nepal–Tibet floods. On 24th June, two earthquakes measuring Mw 7.2 and Mw 7.5 struck Northern Venezuela, which caused damage across the region, especially in the capital city of Caracas. To the best of my knowledge, the current aftermath has resulted in 6,509 people being killed, with 226,696 injured, but 18,100–50,000 are still missing.

A worker at La Esperanza Cemetery in Catia La Mar, La Guaira state, northeast of Caracas, paints graves for unidentified victims of the June 24 earthquake. Photo / AFP

As for the Nepal-Tibet floods, on 26th August, a glacier collapsed on Langtang Lirung, a mountain in the Himalayas, along the Nepal-China border. The section of the glacier dropped ice from around 5,200 to 5,600 m in elevation and fell about 1,200 to 1,900 below into the valley.

This created two things: a seismic event measured at Ms 5.2, as well as a catastrophic flash flood, with the wave estimated to have reached a median height of 70 m, ranging from 40 to 134 m. The wave also managed to reach speeds of 167 to 170 km per hour, which is about 47 to 52 m per second, and the debris travelled for over 100 km. The human cost of this disaster across Chinese-controlled Tibet and Nepal is, at the time of writing, 1,138 dead, with over 5,300 injuries, and over 5,610 people still missing.

Numbered identification tags placed inside pots mark the graves of flash flood victims at a mass burial site in Chitwan, Nepal, Monday, Aug. 31, 2026. (AP Photo/Dar Yasin)

There are many aid agencies and international emergency relief organisations still working in Venezuela, Nepal and Tibet, such as:

  • UNICEF
  • Red Cross
  • Oxfam
  • Save the Children
  • World Vision   

Several other organisations are supporting the victims with rescue and relief operations, so if you spare some money, please donate to one of your national organisations, or an international agency. It’s cliché to say, but it’s still true: every bit counts.

I don’t know what else to say about this blog post, other than to thank Dolly Parton, Tim Curry, and Peter Cullen for sharing their skills and talents with the world, and to the relief workers still working in Venezuela, Nepal and Tibet, trying to help the victims’ families and other survivors rebuild their lives.

Thank you for reading, and I’ll see you next week.

Tour of the Solar System: Haumea

On By somegeektoldme@gmail.comIn Science

18th May 2026. That was the last time we visited the Solar System’s worst tour. We’ve been ranting about movies, football, movies, 1963, movies, and more movies since then, but today marks its glorious return! I know, I’m very sorry for keeping the people of Internet land away from this amazing and highly educational blog post, which is Some Geek Told Me’s Tour of the Solar System.

Since the turning of the Earth and the resurrection of dead comic book characters are sadly very predictable, may I offer you the opportunity to search through the predictable and very serious past entries of the tour. They are:

1.) Meet the Family

2.) The Sun

3.) Planets vs. Dwarf planets

4.) Mercury

5.) Venus

6.) Earth

7.) The Moon

8.) Mars

9.) The Asteroid Belt

10.) Ceres

11.) Jupiter

12.) The Galilean moons

13.) Saturn

14.) Titan

15.) The Moons of Saturn

16.) Uranus

17.) Titania

18.) The Moons of Uranus

19.) The Literary Moons of Uranus

20.) Neptune

21.) Triton

22.) The Moons of Neptune

23.) The Kuiper Belt

24.) Pluto

25.) Charon

26.) The Moons of Pluto

The last stop on the tour was Charon, the largest moon of Pluto, and then the remaining moons of Pluto. So, like the New Horizons spacecraft, we must leave Pluto and its quirky children and venture out into the Kuiper Belt to meet another member of the family: Haumea. Here’s nothing else left to say, but strap yourself in, because we’re off to Haumea!

Low-resolution Hubble Space Telescope image of Haumea and its two moons, Hiʻiaka (top) and Namaka (bottom), June 2015. Credit: From 28x39s WFC3 exposures (images ico803sxq – ico803tmq), in public domain since 2016-05-13. Darin Ragozzine, Florida Institute of Technology: The Intriguing Formation of Haumea’s Satellites (HST Proposal 13873)

We are going to leave Donald Trump’s new trade war with his northern neighbour and visit Haumea, the third recognised dwarf planet in our Solar System. And when discussing a new acquaintance, the extremely polite thing to do is ask what their age is. So, in Haumea’s case, it is about 4.5 billion years old, similar to Pluto and other Kuiper Belt objects.

And just so we’re all on the same page, Haumea is pronounced as hau·may·uh. Now you know.

One of the leading theories about Haumea’s formation is that it formed from the remnants of the Sun’s formation and the creation of the planets and moons. However, it is believed that a proto-Haumea was struck by a huge object, resulting in a gigantic collision. This collision altered the shape and spin of the dwarf planet that would become Haumea.

The discovery of Haumea is not an easy one to discuss or explain, as it’s not cut and dry. The way I understand it, two different research teams both claimed Haumea’s discovery in 2005, with a team led by Mike Brown basing their claim on images from 2004, while the José Luis Ortiz Moreno-led team based their claim on their images from 2003.

Haumea’s name is just as complicated, because both teams put forward different names, with Moreno’s team proposing Ataecina, the goddess of spring, nature, fertility, and the underworld from Iberian culture; though ultimately, a member of Brown’s team, David Rabinowitz, suggested Haumea, the Hawaiian goddess of childbirth and fertility. And wouldn’t you know it, on 17th September 2008, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) announced the name to the public and media; although the working name for it was Santa.

Haumea has some other interesting facts to make you swipe right, as it’s part of a very elite club: it has a ring. No, Beyoncé didn’t put a ring on it, but it’s still there. The ring was discovered in 2017, and it’s believed to be about 70 km wide, at a radius of 2,287 km from the centre of Haumea. This gives Haumea the title of the only known dwarf planet and object in the Kuiper Belt to have a ring system.

An artist’s conception of Haumea, its moons Hi’iaka and Namaka, and its ring system; the moons are much more distant than depicted here. Image credit: Pablo Carlos Budassi.

And speaking of a system, Haumea has something else going for it. You see, Haumea does not just have one moon, but two. Discovered in 2005, though their names were not revealed until the Haumea announcement on 17th September 2008. And, funnily enough, they were called Hiʻiaka (goddess of dance and patroness of the Big Island of Hawaii) and Namaka (goddess of water and the sea), who were named after the daughters of Haumea. One leading theory for Haumea having a ring and two moons is that it is the result of the heavy impact I mentioned earlier in its life.

What makes it remarkable for a dwarf planet to have a ring and two moons is the size of it. Its diameter is only about 1,544 km, which works out to be roughly the length of Great Britain from north to south; a drive from Madrid, Spain, to Paris, France; or the length of New Zealand, from Cape Reinga to Slope Point. Compared to the Earth, Haumea is about 1/7 the width of it.

Haumea’s distance from the Sun is interesting. Since its orbit places it past Neptune, Haumea is a Trans-Neptunian object (TNO), as well as a Kuiper Belt Object (KBO), because it resides in the, yes, you guessed correctly, the Kuiper Belt. Its average distance from the Sun is 6.5 billion km, which is quite staggering.

Another measurement is the AU, or the astronomical unit. This cool measurement is the average distance from the Earth to the Sun, which works out to be about 150 million km, so that’s 1 AU; Haumea is 43 AU. Its perihelion, which is its closest point to the Sun, is about 5.19 billion km, while its aphelion, the furthest point away from the Sun, is about 7.69 billion km. Haumea also has an orbital speed of about 4.53 km/s.

Dwarf planet Haumea and its satellites, imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope’s WFC2 camera from 12 May 2008 and 19 May 2008. The brighter dot orbiting Haumea is the larger outer moon Hi’iaka while the fainter dot is the smaller inner moon Namaka. This animation of the moons’ orbits spans 7 days and the orbital plane of Namaka is oriented vertically. Credit: Hubble Space Telescope/Michael E. Brown.

This, of course, you would know all too well: at that distance, light from the Sun would take along time to reach Haumea, six hours to be precise. In comparison, light from the Sun takes about 8 minutes and 20 seconds to reach Earth. Six hours equates to watching four football games, back to back, but also the run time of the Back to the Future Trilogy, including trailers.

Do you remember when I explained about the proto-Haumea being hit by another object and altering its shape and spin? Of course you do, because you get nothing but straight A’s. You see, because of that impact, Haumea’s rotation is freaky. Not just freaky, but that-will-cost-you-extra-freaky. It has a rotation rate of about four hours, which makes it one of the fastest rotating large objects in our Solar System. The Flash would be so proud.

An extension of this is the time it takes for Haumea to make one orbit around the Sun. As it’s been established, the general rule for orbits in the Solar System is that the closer an object is to the Sun, the shorter the length of time to make one complete orbit around the Sun. Because of this, the opposite is true: the further an object is from the Sun, the longer it takes to make one orbit.

To elaborate on this, it takes Earth approximately 365.25 days to complete one full orbit around the Sun, which makes a year. However, Haumea takes 285 Earth years to make the same journey. To make sense of this measurement, when Haumea was roughly in its present location in time and space; in 1741, George II was the King of Great Britain and Ireland, Great Britain and Spain were fighting each other in The War of Jenkins’ Ear, the Indian kingdom of Travancore had defeated the infamous Dutch East India Company at the Battle of Colachel/Kolachel, with the War of the Austrian Succession in the background, along with the eruption of Oshima–Ōshima and the Kampo tsunami. In 1741, the estimated total world population was about 700 to 750 million people.

Haumea is not exactly the best place to unwind; I mean, it’s not Ibiza or Tahiti. Yes, the travel cost and distance are a concern, but so is the temperature. The average surface temperature of Haumea is about -241°C, which is −151.8 °C colder than the coldest temperature recorded on Earth.

As for Haumea’s atmosphere, to the best of my understanding, Haumea does not have a detectable atmosphere, though future monitoring technology may reveal it. For Haumea’s physical features, it is believed to be 90% covered in a substance like pure crystalline water ice, because of how much light it reflects. And like Pluto, Haumea has tholin-like compounds, which have reddened parts of the surface, as represented in one area as a large dark red patch.

This artist’s concept depicts Haumea and its ring. Image credit: Institute of Astrophysics of Andalusia.

To cap this tour off with Haumea, we need to discuss its shape. One of the criteria for a cosmic object to be classified as a planet is that the object needs to have sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium. Basically, it means that the object needs to be nearly round. Strictly speaking, the inner and outer planets are relatively round, like a football or basketball.1

Haumea is very different from the rest of its family members. When large cosmic objects are spinning, gravity likes to pull them into a shape that reflects a sphere. Because of this, the fast spin causes its centrifugal force to push outward at the equator. This can be observed with the Earth, because it bulges at the equator and flattens at the poles; thus, Earth is actually an oblate spheroid.

But if we go back to Haumea, its extremely fast and powerful spin has caused deformation. Because of its fast spin, the centrifugal force has stretched and pushed Haumea out into an elongated shape, similar to an egg or a rugby ball. Essentially, Haumea is not a sphere; it’s more of an oval shape, like an elongated triaxial ellipsoid. Science is cool.

And with that amazing fact, we shall bring this week’s rant to a close. What’s your favourite fact about Haumea? As always, please let me know. Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Spring is just around the corner for us; Autumn for others, so if you want daily information to help you with this transition, my poorly written anti-social media accounts are still operating on Twitter and Mastodon. Yes, I know it’s called X; I just don’t want to call it that.

Please don’t forget to walk your dog, read a banned book, watch some panda fail videos, and if you ever repeat any of the information I write about, and someone asks you where you learnt it, just say, “Some Geek Told Me.” Take care, and I’ll see you next week.

1 Once again, suck it Flat Earthers!

 

San Diego Comic-Con 2026: So, what happened?

On By somegeektoldme@gmail.comIn Books, Comics, Movies, Television

The staff here at Some Geek Told Me have been working around the clock to bring you the latest news from around the globe.1 And when I say news, I don’t mean politics, sport, crime, or the economy. I know you have no room in your life for such frivolous subjects, so that’s why we thought it was time to bring some much-needed logic and reason to the table.

This is why we pulled out all the stops and spared no expense to bring you our annual San Diego Comic-Con wrap-up!

I do realise some of you amazing people may not have any idea what I’m talking about, and that’s ok; nobody is perfect. Well… nobody living anyway. The point is that San Diego Comic-Con is one of the biggest dates on any geek’s calendar, whether they attend the event or not.

If I can break down the event, it would be this, even though I’m cheating from last year:

San Diego Comic-Con is an opportunity for some of the world’s leading entertainment companies to showcase their upcoming products, including toys, anime, computer games, manga, books, comics, movies, and TV shows, to the ticket-paying fans and the rest of the world.

Once again, the event has been and gone without me attending; however, one fine day, I will win the lottery, and then I’m going there. The queues, the overpriced food, the fans, the creators, the trailers, the back issues- it sounds amazing! Over the course of the event, information trickles out from all sections of the entertainment industry, covering everything you wanted to know, plus stuff you didn’t even know existed! Because of that, it’s my self-appointed job to wade through the content to discover the gems.

However, as with anything on this scantily information-clad blog, there are rules. There are always rules.

1.) I have not read or seen every article or trailer released from San Diego Comic-Con. I can only discuss the things I know about and the things I’m interested in.
2.) Just because a product is on my list doesn’t mean I’ll get to see or purchase it. Quite simply, if something has landed on this list, it has my attention, regardless of whether I watch or purchase it.
3.) I have included some information and trailers that were released just before San Diego Comic-Con. This is because I’m the lead writer on this venture, so what I say goes.

Since I know you’ve been waiting harder than Michael Meyers for Laurie Strode, let’s look at the announcements that were made only for me!

Credit: San Diego Comic-Con

Literature: (Books and Comics)

It’s slim pickings this year, to be honest. There was extra information about Marvel’s Midnight Universe (which I already knew about and had pre-ordered the first issues of the three series a few weeks ago) and some content about some of DC’s new titles, but there were only two comics that were a complete surprise to me.

Batman Day 2026: Batman of Two Worlds #1 (One-shot)

Credit: DC Comics

Indiana Jones and the Sword of Pandemonium #1-5

Credit: Marvel

Star Wars: Edge of the Abyss (Reign of the Empire)

Credit: Random House Worlds

Movies:

A lot of movies were announced at San Diego Comic-Con that will be released between 2027 and 2028, but there were only a few that I cared about that were still being released in 2026.

Coyote vs. Acme

I heard a while ago that this project was shelved, but it seems that the universe has not finished it, and it’s going to see the light of day. To me, the Coyote is one of the world’s greatest optimists. I understand the film is based on Coyote suing Acme because of their faulty products and the damage it has had on Coyote’s physical, financial, mental, and emotional health.

In one of the trailers, it looks like Coyote manages to actually touch Road Runner, after 76 years of trying, along with a shower of cameos. It looks stupid, crazy, and bonkers, so naturally, I want to see it, with or without the boys.

Ebenezer

I know what you’re thinking, seriously, I do. Not another adaptation of Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol. There have been so many versions of it over the decades, though you can’t go wrong with The Muppet Christmas Carol or Scrooged. Having said that, like a new Shakespeare adaptation, I’m ready and down for another version of A Christmas Carol.

From what I gather, Ebenezer Scrooge is being played by Johnny Depp, the go-to man for quirky or weird characters. Supposedly, the film will flesh out more of the story about Ebenezer, but I’m not 100% sure. I also saw the reference in the trailer to Depp’s first movie role in A Nightmare on Elm Street with the bed. Nice touch.

Whatever the case, Ebenezer Scrooge has one of the greatest, if not the most powerful, redemption arcs in literature, so it will be terrific to see him again.

Clayface

The DCU is still trying to establish itself, since it started with its first movie entries in the form of Superman and Supergirl. Both films have been great, but I would say their box office returns have disappointed the studios. Enter their 3rd entry, Clayface, a member of Batman’s rogues’ gallery, who is one of the few who have legitimate superpowers.

It was a bold move to give Matt Hagen his own movie, and it seems the movie is the offspring of John Wick and The Substance; and for the record, that’s not a bad thing. Whether it’s the right time to bring a bit of horror into the DCU, I can’t say; however, I will be watching this odd nugget in the cinema. Count on it.

Avengers: Doomsday

If you’ve been a follower, supporter, or subscriber of New Zealand’s 5th least favourite website, then this one pretty much speaks for itself. If it’s possible, I want to go to the opening screening at our only cinema this December. I’ll even try to take the day off work, if I have to.

Not counting 1994’s The Fantastic Four, Fox had three cinematic attempts at portraying Latveria’s most beloved ruler and sorcerer correctly, but has failed three times. It’s now Marvel, Disney, and Robert Downey Jr.’s turn, and they really need to get Victor right.

Television shows:

Unlike the movie announcements, there are a lot of TV shows I would like to see. Now, whether that’s a positive or negative thing, I am not smart enough to answer that.

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 4

Star Trek: Discovery and Star Trek: Strange New Worlds have reignited my love for all things Star Trek, to the point that I’m trying to track down and watch Star Trek: Enterprise, so I can work my way from the beginning. I’ve also been reading some Star Trek comics, which is quite rare for me.

I’ve been pleasantly surprised with Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, so Season 4 should be awesome. Having the Gorn as the main antagonists throughout the series has been, in my humble opinion, a stroke of genius. I love the show and cast, along with the diverse storylines. With Star Trek’s 60th anniversary just around the corner, the future of Star Trek seems solid.

Lanterns

I realise Lanterns has already started on HBO Max, and it’s part of the DCU, via its television arm. Currently, I’ve just started on Season Three of The Greatest American Hero; it’s a long story. I also realise Lanterns is gathering a lot of backlash, but I have faith in the showrunners; I mean, you have to, right?

Anyway, I will start on Lanterns soon. I have no idea how much of the series will be set off-Earth, but it’s certainly great to see John Stewart (Aaron Pierre) in a live-action role, along with Hal Jordan (Kyle Chandler) and hopefully other notable characters. I have learned that Nathan Fillion plays Guy Gardner and Ulrich Thomsen as Sinestro. Seriously, I’m looking forward to this show, and maybe Kyle Rayner.

The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power Season 3

Before I go back to this show, I’ll rewatch the first and second seasons, and I think the series is getting better. It ended with devastation, but also laced with hope, which I believe is a good place for a cliffhanger. 19 rings of power have been forged over the two seasons, but that just leaves one ring to be created. The One Ring. The Master Ring. The Ruling Ring.

Three Rings for the Elven-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die,
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
Where the Shadows lie.

One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

To my understanding, Sauron, the Dark Lord, does in fact forge the final power ring in the season and sit on his dark throne. Will we see more of the various rings’ abilities? Only time will tell.

Avatar: Seven Havens

We are going back to the world of Avatar. No, not James Cameron’s Avatar; I mean the OG, Avatar: The Last Airbender. I actually discussed this TV show in last year’s San Diego Comic-Con wrap-up, but we only had one image; now we have a trailer. I believe the story is set after the events of The Legend of Korra, with Avatar Korra obviously having passed away, though I don’t know the time jump.

Korra’s world was different from Ang’s because of the march of technology, so I do wonder what the world’s technology will look like now. Having said that, again, to the best of my understanding, some sort of disaster or apocalypse has hit the world, and somehow regressed or devolved civilisation.

I have high hopes for Avatar Pavi, though I have no idea how I’ll ever see it.

Reacher Season 4

Like Lanterns, the new season of Reacher has already started, and I’m going to be there for it. As a character, I like Jack Reacher- sorry, Reacher, my bad; he’s like James Bond, Jack Ryan, Sherlock Holmes and Batman, all rolled into one. My wife has started reading the books, and I will also. One day.

Reacher Season 4 will be on my list for late 2026, if not sometime in 2027. Not that it matters in the scheme of things, of course.

And speaking of the scheme of things, I know there’s a massive amount of things going wrong in the world, but there’s also a lot of positive. I fear sometimes the negative can drown out the positive, and it can convince you that the world is broken because of A, B and C. That could be the case, but D, E and F are fighting to rebalance it. The world’s not a lost cause, because you and me, well, we’re still here, and that counts for something.

Yes, reviewing the announcements from a pop culture event is petty and vain, but it’s not ignoring the pain of the world; it’s there to humble it.

There was probably a vital piece of information that I missed from San Diego Comic-Con, so as always, please let me know.

That delightful transition brings us to the end of another blog for another week. Remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, Up the Wahs, and I’ll see you next week for the return of the least recommended tour in the Solar System.

1 Flat Earthers, it sucks to be you.

Movie Review: Spider-Man: Brand New Day

On By somegeektoldme@gmail.comIn Movies

Friends, Bloggers, Internet users, lend me your ears! The moment has arrived when the truth shall be finally revealed to you. Yes, my young padawans, my review of Spider-Man: Brand New Day is upon us, as you have waited long enough. In truth, waiting two weeks isn’t that bad, but the time frame could have been worse.

This juggernaut of a movie is smashing the box office, having earned, at the time of writing this well-read blog, US$1.843 billion, which still just boggles my mind.1 So, let’s follow the template I have set for myself and see where it leads. If you missed the preview, you can find it here.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day opened in New Zealand on 30th July, although I only managed to see it last week. It was another typical cold, dark winter Tuesday night at the only cinema in town. Armed with a pre-bought ticket and with expensive snacks from the counter, I was ready to be entertained, and so were 22 other people.

There was a trailer for the new Jason Statham movie, Mutiny, where I think he is trying to kill a cargo ship. You can’t go wrong with a Statham movie for a date night. Anyway, before I dissect Marvel Studios’ 38th film, I want to discuss an epiphany I had after the film. As I was making my way home, it occurred to me that the way I consume movies at the cinema has changed.

I go to the cinema for roughly two different reasons now. The first one is when my wife and I, or just me, take UMC1 and UMC2, which is essentially a family event. In that regard, I’m there to watch whatever crazy-arse movie the boys want to see, usually in the school holidays. There’s no preview to write, and certainly no review, apart from the debrief with the boys about their favourite moments in the movie.

The second reason I’m at the cinema is now to review a movie. This means instead of sitting in my seat waiting for the film to start, and just being happy for the experience, I’m finding myself remembering my preview questions and preparing to store various scenes of the movie into useless parts of my mind. This has transformed my cinematic experience into a venture of criticism.

Whether this is a new positive or negative aspect of my personality, I’ll have to wait for God to fill me in. And with that delightful notion, let’s go over the rules of the review.

1.) Please be aware there will be spoilers concerning the movie, so proceed with extreme anxiety and caution; even after 2,000 years.

2.) The aim of my reviews are not to rip apart the subject or trash it. If I liked the subject enough to watch it, then I’ll give my honest (possibly biased) opinion.

3.) I’m not a professional critic, so I’m not going to dive into deeper concepts and themes, or the art of filmmaking. I’m just a geek; always have been, and always will be.

With the introduction now complete, along with Obi-Wan’s failure; and since we’re not here to watch Count Binface dance, let’s get on with the review!

Credit: Marvel Studios/Disney and my local cinema

Because it’s rare for me to deviate from this course of action, the first step is to discuss whether I liked the film or not, and as usual, I did. The MCU can still entertain me after 18 years, which means I’m still invested in it, as well as everybody’s favourite friendly neighbourhood Spider-Man. To be honest, I’ll always give a damn about ‘Ol Web-head.

Things I liked:

Following the plan, I’ll fire these off in no special order, as I don’t want my OCD to be that intense.

Right off the bat was the introduction by Tom Holland at the start of the movie. I can’t remember if I have ever seen an actor talking directly to the audience to thank them for watching the movie, as well as pointing out that the entire production crew have pulled out all the stops to make the best film possible, because they love Peter Parker, just like us. It was cool.

And speaking of cool, I was impressed by Parker’s Spider-Man suit, because it looked…amazing and spectacular.2 It looks quite comic-accurate, though to be fair, does it have to? The homage to Amazing Fantasy #15 was not lost on me either; it was…amazing.3

I liked the symmetry in the interactions between the characters. In No Way Home, Tobey Maguire’s Peter Parker attempts to stop Tom Holland’s Peter Parker from killing Willem Dafoe’s Norman Osborn. This mirrors Holland’s Peter Parker trying to prevent Sadie Sink’s Jean Grey from killing Tramell Tillman’s Bill Metzger. It’s an interesting form of compasssion, no matter how you want to describe it.

The parallels between the two scenes were strong, with Parker learning his lesson and trying to make sure Jean Grey doesn’t make the mistake of killing Tillman. It’s one of Parker’s strongest traits to uphold his own personal belief system, to himself, the world, and to his friends and allies, like the Punisher, and now, Jean Grey.

Now, let’s discuss Jean Grey. I understand that with Disney’s acquisition of Fox, they finally got the movie rights back for the Fantastic Four and the X-Men. Rather than quickly stuffing these characters into movies, they bided their time, which was clever. They did this by introducing the Fantastic Four as being from another universe, and it looks like the X-Men, or at the earliest, mutants, will come from the main universe; not counting the X-Men Fox Universe.

So we have now been introduced to at least two mutants, with Jean Grey, with the first being Namor. How Marvel is going to continue to introduce mutants in the main universe remains to be seen, although Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars will deal with the Fox X-Men.

It will be great to follow Jean’s heroic journey through the MCU, because when we first met her, she was already an adult in X-Men, as Famke Janssen. Having her on a quest to find her sister, Sara, a forgotten Marvel character, was key to seeing how loyal she can be, but also how powerful she can really be.

I can’t be sure about it, but I was wondering: when Damage Control was running the experiments on Sara and Jean, it gave me the idea that maybe the computer programme they were running was an early or prototype version of Cerebro. I will laugh and laugh if I’m correct about that.

Another thing that impressed me was Scorpion’s fighting style, as in controlling his tail like a limb, similar to Doctor’s Octopus’ arms. When he was fighting Spider-Man, it was fantastic to see him use his tail like that, as it was extremely smart and creative.

I also can’t be the only person to notice the similarities between Parker being accidentally shot while saving someone by the Punisher and the Death of Spider-Man storyline in Ultimate Spider-Man Vol 1 from 2011, where Ultimate Peter Parker is accidentally shot by the Ultimate Punisher while saving Ultimate Captain America.

Yes, it’s true: Ultimate Punisher did not kill him, as Parker returned home to fight the Ultimate Green Goblin, aka Norman Osborn. And yes, Ultimate Parker indeed died defeating Ultimate Osborn, but he did so with the bullet wound from the Ultimate Punisher, so at worst, the Ultimate Punisher aided in Ultimate Parker’s death, since he couldn’t fight the Ultimate Green Goblin at 100%. Comic books- who would read them?

I enjoyed Parker’s and Frank Castle’s relationship too, but also their performances, along with everybody else’s. Obviously, Holland and Zendaya’s relationship is jumping from behind the camera to in front of it, but it still works. Mark Ruffalo, Florence Pugh, Sadie Sink, Jacob Batalon, and Jon Bernthal all understood the assignments and were fantastic.

I’ve mentioned this before, but since I don’t have Disney+, I have no idea what’s been happening in the MCU TV shows. That being the case, I don’t know if Damage Control has been seen in the shows or not. Regardless, it was great to see them in the movie, though it seems like their cinematic portrayal and their comic counterparts are different, with vastly different company objectives. Still, it was nice to see them, as they’re an overlooked and underrated corner of the Marvel Universe.

Things I disliked:

I realise this film is getting attention through vast amounts of money and great acting performances, along with positive praise among critics and fans, but that doesn’t mean it’s invulnerable to criticism.

I may have missed this point, as there was a lot of information fired at us, in addition to being revealed, but when we left Parker at the end of No Way Home, Parker had moved into a new apartment; but when Brand New Day rolled around, Parker was in a completely different apartment.

That in itself is not a problem, but what is a problem is that, to the best of my knowledge, the film never clears up what Parker does outside of the mask. I suppose something in the film clears it up; it could be referred to as his university- maybe Empire State University, but it’s not clear. What exactly does Parker do? Does he study or work or both?

Because this leads us to another question: what does Parker do for money? Does he have an income stream, and what is it? Does he live off money earned as Spider-Man? Is he, in fact, a part-time photographer for the Daily Bugle, or does he have another job? How does he afford to live in that apartment?

One of the key reasons Peter Parker has been so relatable to readers is that he has shared many problems that are grounded in reality, namely paying his bills, but also helping with Aunt May’s bills. Of course, in this universe, Aunt May is dead, but Parker does not seem to have any money issues that I saw. Why is that?

Another thing to add to this issue is the fact that his suit is back to being powered by AI. At the end of No Way Home, Parker had opened a new chapter for himself, with a non-tech suit, via a homemade fabric suit. Years later, he seems to have upgraded the suit, forgetting the lessons he learnt in all of the previous films. He’s become the new Tony Stark, and I feel that’s not his role.

When advertising a movie, Marvel can sometimes be a little deceptive with its trailers and press releases. An example of this in Brand New Day was information released about Tombstone, Boomerang, Tarantula, The Hand, and Ramrod, and I thought it was all true.

To my disappointment, Tombstone was in the film for roughly two minutes, though an argument could be made for only one minute. While the trailers featured Spider-Man fighting Boomerang and Tarantula, the movie’s footage featured the identical footage as the trailer. Basically, the amount of time that you saw of Boomerang and Tarantula in the trailers was the same in the movie. As for Ramrod, he didn’t feature in the trailers, but he had the same amount of screen time as the other two.

I do have some issues around the Punisher. Again, having not seen the MCU TV shows, how can the Punisher be walking the streets, or in a Damage Control building with agents and a hospital, AND NOT BE ARRESTED?

How in the hell did he walk out of the Damage Control without being arrested, considering Metzger and his agents were staring at him? How can the Punisher, one of the largest serial killers in the United States of America, just walk into a hospital with a bleeding Spider-Man, be allowed to stay in a hospital room, and slip out without being notified to the police and not be arrested? How?

And speaking about the Punisher, how does he finance his war on crime? Where does the money come from to buy these powerful guns? How did he get his Battle Van fixed and repaired so quickly after it was badly damaged the previous day, or does he just have a spare Battle Van lying around?

As for the hospital scene, at no point did the film address the fact that multiple hospital staff would have seen Peter’s face, since his mask was removed. Regardless of whether they know his identity or not, they have seen his face, which means supervillains and criminals could capture and torture the information from the hospital staff, as well as securing footage from the hospital’s surveillance.

I also feel terrible for bringing this up, but Jean’s hypocrisy was farcical. At the climax of the film, when she has Metzger under her control, she complains about how evil he is and that he’s a murderer, but she has completely skipped over her own actions. With Jean mentally controlling people, she has destroyed careers, cars, and buildings, along with getting people arrested, in addition to injuring people, with the possibility of killing one person who got hit by a bus. Bruce Banner is now locked up in a psychiatric hospital because of her.

In her speech, she accepted no responsibility for her actions, especially for creating a psionic field. Who knows how many people were killed when she did that? At some point, Jean will need to own up to her actions.

I think I have mentioned this before in the Thunderbolts* and Captain America: Brave New World reviews, but when something like a psionic field appears in New York, of all places, why is it that no extra superheroes turn up to help? Not a single one? If the MCU is interconnected as they say it is, why don’t these events mean anything to the world, because nobody, absolutely nobody, from any superhuman team or government department arrived to lend a hand? Not even Daredevil?

To round it out, Parker’s transformation seemed to mean nothing. He solved the problem, but simply making friends? Does this mean that if Parker ever feels lonely or isolated again, he will revert to the “Spider” persona? Does he still have access to his organic webbing or not? I thought the resolution to this problem was rather weak.

So, what about my preview questions?

  • Is having four different villains, Scorpion, Tombstone, Boomerang, and Tarantula, too many? Will they be working together? No, this was not like Spider-Man 3, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, or Spider-Man: No Way Home, where, wherever you looked, there was a villain. Like I said before, Boomerang, Tarantula, and also Ramrod had blink-and-miss-them cameos; Tombstone had two minutes at most, while Scorpion had the largest role. They were not working together.
  • How will Black Widow be introduced in the movie? She was like an information consultant because Peter needed information about the person attacking Damage Control facilities.
  • Will it be revealed how Peter has built a life out of thin air, considering Peter Parker does not exist? It was not explained or touched on at all.
  • Will Ned start to turn against Peter or Spider-Man? In the film, there was no red flag to indicate his eventual betrayal.
  • Does Matt Murdock/Daredevil or Kingpin make an appearance? Sadly, they were absent.
  • Will Jean Grey be classified as a mutant? To the best of my knowledge, she was referred to as “special.”
  • Will there be any form of early mutant legalisation? Nothing, but I wonder if Parker’s inhibitor will be the basis of the mutant collar inhibitor.
  • Will the transformations Peter goes through be permanent? Totally unclear. Maybe he still has his organic webbing, but by the end, he’s back to his normal self; though he could revert under the wrong conditions, I think.
  • Does Peter know Boomerang, outside of his mask? No idea, because Boomerang had no lines, and in the film for three seconds.
  • What is the Hand doing in the film? They are reformed and working for Damage Control.
  • Can we expect any other cameos, whether Avengers or X-Men? Apart from Black Widow and the Hulk, there was also the appearance of Detective Jean DeWolff. Does that mean Sin-Eater is coming?
  • Will Bruce Banner be able to help Peter? He did after having a conversation about suppressing mutations.
  • Is Morlun involved in the movie? Once again, sadly no.
  • Will Peter try to break up Mary Jane’s relationship with her boyfriend? That’s a good question, because yes, he did. However, the end of the film revealed that they have become friends again.
  • Will there be a Doctor Doom reference? If there was, I missed it. There was an end-credit scene that showed Peter was in space via the Spidey-Tracker, but that was it.

Overall, I enjoyed the film, and it just reaffirmed my belief in the character. Spider-Man is in my top five favourite Marvel characters, so to show my support, I have preordered Midnight Spider-Man #1, which is being released in October. I’ll have to let you know my thoughts about that issue, along with Midnight X-Men #1 and Midnight Fantastic Four #1.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day is a solid and entertaining movie. Anyway, don’t trust me; go watch it for yourself, so you can be the judge. Have you seen Spider-Man: Brand New Day? Please tell me your thoughts about it. I would love to know.

The next MCU movie is Avengers: Doomsday in December, which I will preview and review. However, the next preview/review will either be Clayface (my decision) or Wicker (my wife’s choice), whichever one is released first. Clayface is in my wheelhouse, but Wicker is not, but I’ll give it a go anyway; mainly because my wife thinks I can’t preview/review a romantic fantasy comedy. Challenge accepted!

Ok, that’s another blog for another week. Thanks once again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, follow Nigel Farage’s Parliamentary investigation, and I’ll see you next week, where we discuss the news from San Diego Comic-Con. It’s hard-hitting investigative journalism!

1 Not The Juggernaut of course, because as Spider-Man knows all too well, nothing stops the Juggernaut!

2 If anybody is clever enough to understand that reference, please let me know.

3 Sorry, its the last one.

Movie Preview: Spider-Man: Brand New Day

On By somegeektoldme@gmail.comIn Movies

The more things change, the more they stay the same. Here we are again, for the final time this Winter, for a movie preview/review. Yes, the Moirai, or should that be Disney, have decreed that I commit more time to this amazing venture, which, to my humble credit, I have gracefully said, “Sure, bro.”

The FIFA World Cup seems a distant memory, along with the first half of the Nations Championship, though the Clacton by-election is this week, so hopefully God has a sense of humour, and Nigel Farage will lose to Count Binface. Dreams are free, mate, dreams are free. I’ll mention the winner next week, so stay glued to New Zealand’s 5th least favourite website.

With all of that cool stuff out of the way, we need to discuss Spider-Man: Brand New Day. This hasn’t happened for a long time on this amazing account, but the film has been out since 30th July, and I’m just releasing a preview. However, just to lay your fears to rest, I’ll be watching the film tomorrow at 8 pm, since I’ve secured my ticket for the screening. Old habits are hard to break.

Before I stumble into another awful attempt at alliteration and previewing a superhero movie, we need to discuss the elephant in the room, or should that be the $1 billion at the box office. I’m never going to do this again, as in wait so long to write a preview of a movie, when it’s already been released, generated $1 billion, as well as trying to avoid memes, reviews, and posts about the film.

Never again; it’s been too awkward and stressful. It also means some things that I would have asked in my preview questions have already been answered.

I have tried so hard to block out information about the film, but some information has bled through, though it’s to be expected. Spider-Man: Brand New Day has been on people’s radar for a while. It’s no secret that the film is the 38th entry in the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe), with the 39th being Avengers: Doomsday, due in theatres in December 2026. I’ll be nearly on holiday for that one, so we’ll see how that pans out. This is a classic example of a first-world problem.

Anyway, Spider-Man: Brand New Day gives us the first appearance of Peter Parker since Spider-Man: No Way Home in 2021. Of course, the MCU has kept chugging out cinematic content since then, with Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, Thor: Love and Thunder, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, The Marvels, Deadpool & Wolverine, Captain America: Brave New World, Thunderbolts* and The Fantastic Four: First Steps; with The Marvels being the only MCU film I have not seen, and its proved difficult to rent. Another first-world problem in action.

The cast is Peter Parker / Spider-Man (Tom Holland), Michelle “MJ” Jones-Watson (Zendaya), Jean Grey (Sadie Sink), Ned Leeds (Jacob Batalon), Frank Castle / Punisher (Jon Bernthal), Yelena Belova / Black Widow (Florence Pugh), and Bruce Banner / Hulk (Mark Ruffalo); though there are others, I need to move things along.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day was directed by Destin Daniel Cretton (who previously directed Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings) and written by Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers, who both have co-written other MCU films like Spider-Man: Homecoming, Ant-Man and the Wasp, Spider-Man: Far From Home, and Spider-Man: No Way Home. Its armed with a budget of an estimated US$225 million, roughly the same as The Avengers’ budget from 2012.

So, sit back and relax, while we continue our dive into Phase Six with Spider-Man: Brand New Day! Let’s do it!

Credit: UMC1 and UMC2’s Lego collection

Am I looking forward to watching Spider-Man: Brand New Day?

Yes, yes, of course, the answer is yes. As I said before, the last time we saw Peter was in Spider-Man: No Way Home, not counting 2023’s Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse. Now, I’ve mentioned this several times when writing these world-famous previews, but I don’t have Disney +, so I haven’t seen any of the MCU TV shows.

This means I don’t know what’s been happening with Moon Knight, Daredevil, Wonder Man, but more importantly, for the context of the movie, Hulk and the Punisher. I really have no idea what they have been doing, other than being green and shooting people.

Tom Holland’s Spider-Man has become a vital cog in the MCU machine, mainly because we have watched Peter grow up, secure some victories, but also suffer defeats, and we’ve been there along the way. It’s almost like checking in on an old mate that you don’t get to see often.

The title, Brand New Day, obviously sets up, to me at least, a possible opening chapter in a new Spider-Man film trilogy, featuring the word, Day, similar to Home, in Spider-Man: Homecoming, Spider-Man: Far From Home, and Spider-Man: No Way Home. However, I have been known to be wrong. From time to time.

Comic book fans will recognise Brand New Day as the follow-up storyline to one of Marvel’s worst Spider-Man storylines, One More Day, though the Clone Saga and Sins Past could give One More Day a run for its money. I remember that as soon as I had read all of the issues in One More Day, I sold it as soon as I could, because I didn’t want it under the same roof as me. I hated it.

Brand New Day was a reset for the Spider-Man titles, with Peter being single and living his best life with new friends and enemies, after he made a deal with Mephisto to save Aunt May from death, by giving up his marriage to Mary Jane, by allowing Mephisto to remove it from reality. I believe the thinking at the time was to align the Spider-Man from the comics to the Spider-Man from the films, namely, Sam Raimi’s trilogy, and to make him single and younger. Again, I hated it.

Having Mephisto remove people’s knowledge of Peter and Mary Jane’s marriage from reality was lifted from One More Day, and used in No Way Home, but instead of Mephisto, it was Doctor Strange removing people’s knowledge of Peter being Spider-Man. Comics and movies, what a deadly combination.

What is the movie about?

According to Marvel.com, the premise is this:

It’s a BRAND NEW DAY for Peter Parker. Fighting crime full-time as Spider-Man in a world that doesn’t remember him—and the pressure of seeing his old friends move on without him—sparks a change in Peter he may not have the power to control. But that transformation might also be the only thing that can stop a shocking new threat to the city and those he loves—a powerful villain no one can even see.

What can we expect?

The running time is 145 minutes, which places it roughly around the same time as The Avengers, from way back in 2012. I saw that film three times at the cinema, what a geek. I’m not 100% sure how much time has passed since Spider-Man: No Way Home, especially because the MCU is a bit funky. Still, with research, it says that No Way Home was set in 2024, and Brand New Day is in 2028.

From the trailers, Peter is going through a transformation reminiscent of “The Other” storyline, which appeared in Spider-Man comics as a crossover between the titles. In it, Peter is pursued by a freaky, universe-hopping life-force vampire named Morlun, who defeats him, transforms, and is reborn. It will be interesting to see how much of “The Other” is used in the movie.

From the trailers, it appears that Peter will be able to create organic webbing, similar to Toby Maguire’s Spider-Man (Earth-96283) and Spider-Man Noir (Earth-90214/90214B). This is a great reminder that I still need to watch Spider-Noir, because it looks awesome.

I think one of the biggest things to remember before you see the film is the fact that Doctor Strange removed the planet’s knowledge of Peter Parker being Spider-Man, but also that Peter Parker even exists at all, which includes from Mary Jane/MJ and Ned.

I can only imagine that a large chunk of the film will handle Peter trying to reestablish his relationships with them. Will this film lay the seeds of Ned’s ultimate evolution, turning him into the Hobgoblin, thus continuing the trend of Peter’s BFF becoming a supervillain and trying to kill him?

As a side note, it would be extremely difficult for Peter to live, considering there would be no record of him even existing; he’s a ghost. He would have to go and get official documents stating who he was, as well as proof that he’s a US citizen; otherwise, he would be deported. Also, try to imagine the levels of madness it would take if you knew lots of information about different people and the world, but nobody, and I mean nobody, knew anything about you.

The trailers also give the impression that Peter and Frank Castle, aka The Punisher, have some sort of working relationship, since, as Spider-Man, Peter calls him “Frank” in a plea for help. However, it’s unclear whether Peter has revealed his identity to Frank. I could be wrong about what I’ve seen, but it seems like Frank and Peter are acting like brothers, as in supporting each other, as well as bickering and arguing. Watching them debate the morality of killing criminals would be interesting. It also suggests that Dr Bruce Banner has not remembered who Peter is, so their relationship would be awkward as well.

With the known villains, Marvel has been very loose with these details, considering the amount of public knowledge of the characters, because of the trailers and toys, like the plague of Ooshies that have infected the world. These include Scorpion (last seen in Spider-Man: Homecoming), Tombstone, Boomerang, and Tarantula, along with The Hand.

The Hand provides me with a great transition point, since, to the best of my understanding, they have featured in the MCU TV shows. Similar to the Disney + Star Wars shows, there is so much I have missed with the MCU shows that sometimes I feel that there’s no point getting Disney + because of the massive back catalogue. Like I said, sometimes.

Before the movie was released, there was speculation as to Sadie Sink’s role, so when the trailer was released, people started to guess the identity of the entity that was somehow taking over people or possessing them. The internet is a fertile place for growing conspiracy theories, and for once, the conspiracy theorists were correct that the mystery villain was, in fact, Jean Grey. It’s a weird feeling knowing a key piece of hidden information about a movie, before you watch it, considering you have a ticket in your hand.

Since Jean Grey is involved, my questions about the X-Men, or at least mutants, will be discussed. Hopefully, we will see some fantastic fight scenes, along with powerful emotional scenes, with Peter trying to reconnect with people. Who knows?

Do I have concerns?

One day, I’ll answer this question by saying I have no concerns, but it’s not today. That being the case, here are my concerns about a film that has earned US$1.6 billion at the box office:

  • Is having four different villains, Scorpion, Tombstone, Boomerang, and Tarantula, too many? Will they be working together?
  • How will Black Widow be introduced in the movie?
  • Will it be revealed how Peter has built a life out of thin air, considering Peter Parker does not exist?
  • Will Ned start to turn against Peter or Spider-Man?
  • Does Matt Murdock/Daredevil or Kingpin make an appearance?
  • Will Jean Grey be classified as a mutant?
  • Will there be any form of early mutant legalisation?
  • Will the transformations Peter goes through be permanent?
  • Does Peter know Boomerang, outside of his mask?
  • What is the Hand doing in the film?
  • Can we expect any other cameos, whether Avengers or X-Men?
  • Will Bruce Banner be able to help Peter?
  • Is Morlun involved in the movie?
  • Will Peter try to break up Mary Jane’s relationship with her boyfriend?
  • Will there be a Doctor Doom reference?

As always, there’s probably going to be some questions to ask after the film. Are you planning on watching Spider-Man: Brand New Day, or have you already seen it? As always, please let me know.

I’m sorry if this preview is a tad shorter than usual, but I just want to watch the film while eating and drinking vastly over-priced items. And that’s another blog for another week.

Last Thursday, it was -5 °C at 6 am, which is just madness to me, because I’ve been going to bed wearing a hoodie and a beanie. I want to wear my dressing gown and slippers to work to be warm, but I’m sure it would be frowned upon.

Thanks once again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, and if you can vote in the Clacton by-election on 13th August, remember that it’s bin day. Bin for the Win!! Please make Nigel Farage unemployed.

Take care, and I’ll see you next week for the Spider-Man: Brand New Day Review!

Movie Review: The Odyssey

On By somegeektoldme@gmail.comIn Movies

The start of August has brought the Commonwealth Games to a close, along with the second part of my world-famous movie preview/reviews, in the form of The Odyssey. This Winter (Maybe Summer for you) has been very busy for the staff of Some Geek Told Me, since The Odyssey is the third preview/review of the season, which started with Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu, and Supergirl, but will end with Spider-Man: Brand New Day, which just opened.

My astonishing and riveting preview for The Odyssey can be found here.

In my last review, I talked about how predictable I can be, specifically regarding my use of the same preview and review template and my habit of purchasing advanced movie tickets. However, I must warn you to brace yourself for a surprise: I have changed my usual approach. You can teach an old dog new tricks!

If you’ve read the preview, you would have discovered the shocking revelation that has shaken the pop culture world to its core! Well…maybe not that far. Anyway, because I was on my break, I watched The Odyssey without an advanced ticket, and the planet did not stop spinning. Who would have thought?!

Because we only have one cinema, it’s hit-or-miss whether the theatre you are in will be busy or not. Case in point, after purchasing my ticket, drink and snacks to fuel me through the upcoming three hours, and to cry about the cost, I noticed that the theatre had 23 people in it, which was very busy for a Tuesday night.

I also noticed that 2026 is the year of Zendaya, based on the fact that I was sitting in a theatre waiting to see The Odyssey, where I also experienced the trailers for Spider-Man: Brand New Day, and Dune: Part Three; two films that I will see at the cinema. Now, whether she is in Avengers: Doomsday or not, I can’t say, but whatever the case may be, she seems to be everywhere.

Alright, I think the only thing left to do is to cover the rules for the review:

1.) Please be aware there will be spoilers concerning the movie, so proceed with extreme anxiety and caution; even after 2,000 years.

2.) The aim of my reviews are not to rip apart the subject or trash it. If I liked the subject enough to watch it, then I’ll give my honest (possibly biased) opinion.

3.) I’m not a professional critic, so I’m not going to dive into deeper concepts and themes, or the art of filmmaking. I’m just a geek; always have been, and always will be.

And that is it. The key has turned, the coin has been flipped, and the Joker has escaped from Arkham again. So without further delay, let’s get on with the review!

Credit: Universal Pictures and my local cinema. I’m very sorry, but some random idiot managed to catch his reflection on the glass, while taking a photo. What a moron.

One of the first things we need to discuss is whether I liked the movie. As usual, I did. What a surprise! Now, before I expand on this concept, I’m going to try really hard not to compare the film to the poem. Why is that? What a wise and just question that was, my liege. Hundreds of other people would have already done this, so my two cents wouldn’t change the narrative around that, nor will I try to judge Odysseus’ actions. Ok, maybe I’ll do that, just a little.

Things I liked:

I tend to allow my rants to flow, so there’s no real structure or order to them. I’ll start with one of the scenes that hit me the most: Argos. I did mention Ancient Greece’s most loyal dog in the preview, as in, I hoped he would be cut from the film. This is because I can’t handle the death of a fictional dog, much the same as the death of a real dog. No, that’s not true.

Basically, I didn’t want to see Argos finally see his master after 20 years and die, because I would start weeping. Oh no, Christopher Nolan hit me below the belt, with footage of Argos’ siblings being murdered, and Odysseus choosing him, thus saving him. Showing the audience the developing bond between Argos and Odysseus actually made me get all of my crying done, so when Argos died, his death was more like Luke Skywalker’s death in Star Wars: Episode VIII-The Last Jedi. For an audience member, that extra scene was great, but as a dog lover, it was brutal.

Anne Hathaway’s speech as Penelope to Tom Holland’s Telemachus, about being the one who has sat on the throne of Ithaca for the last 20 years and unofficially ruled, was powerful, poignant, and emotional. Penelope is imprisoned on her own island, and Hathaway did a great job at displaying the conflicting feelings she had about the whole crisis.

And speaking of crisis, Robert Pattinson’s Antinous was terrible, but in the best way. Antinous was a typical villain who sought to gain power and become a leader, but didn’t want to take any physical action himself to make things happen. He would rather make other people do the work, like ordering Telemachus to be ambushed and assassinated, but not be a part of it himself. Plausible deniability in action.

This concept was never more on display than during the slaughter of the suitors. Antinous, hiding from the battle and ordering others into the fight, made me laugh because it just reinforced how much of a coward he was, with the seeds planted back when he traded places with Sinon. Kudos to the fight choreography for that scene, especially having the weapons being fed into the fight via a hole in the ceiling.

The scene with the Laestrygonians was brutal as well, especially the part where they were capsizing the boats and killing the survivors. It would be a terrifying experience to encounter an enemy that seeks your total annihilation, without any verbal threats. The Ithacans were massacred, losing over 60% of their surviving forces. There were no compromises, almost like Terminators.

Charybdis and Polyphemus were both outstanding, so after the film, I researched how they were created, and like I just said, they were outstanding. I also thought it was a smart idea not to show you what the Sirens looked like, as well as what their song sounded like.

For the Trojan Horse, I watched Nolan’s interview about its origin. I thought it was very creative to have the horse wheel-less, as well as being half-buried in the sand. It goes against the idea and concept of the Trojan Horse, and as Katy Perry said, I liked it. Another scene I liked was the journey to the Underworld, or at least, a part of Hades. The imagery was superb and terrifying, as Sinon drank blood to talk, and the dead chased the survivors. Having the actors emerge from the black sand was genius and added to the surreal nature of the scene.

With Circe, I fell into a trap and expected to see the transformation of the soldiers into pigs, to be done via CGI. Well, don’t I need to go and stand in the corner with a dunce’s hat on?! I thought the practical application of Samantha Morton physically altering the face and bodies of Odysseus’ men was equally amazing and horrifying; especially the shot where she stretched her arm down a soldier’s throat was jaw-dropping.

I think it was important to keep visiting Zeus’ law or Xenia, as in being respected and honoured, versus breaking it. Throughout the film, xenia was constantly being respected and disrespected, which, of course, leads to the destruction of Troy and Odysseus’ 10-year journey home. When the “Sea People” were first mentioned, concerning a group of seafaring people, raping, pillaging, and killing along the various coastlines, I knew it was the Greeks, because let’s be honest, how could it not be?

I know The Odyssey and Nolan’s other recent film, Oppenheimer, forces their main protagonists to confront what they have unleashed upon the world, while witnessing the damage and carnage, having never stopped to consider the consequences of trying to be the smartest person in the room.

It’s always interesting to note that Odysseus knows how important xenia is to the gods, but he keeps breaking it; though it finally catches up with his morality and conscience on Ithaca.

There are other things I liked, but we can’t spend the whole time bogged down in the section, so as the All-American Rejects said, we need to move along.

Things I disliked:

Just like any movie, some elements didn’t sit well with me. The first is with the armour, mainly Agamemnon’s and the Trojans. Agamemnon, the King of Mycenae, King of Men, and the Supreme Commander of the Greek Forces, needed to look different from the other Greek leaders and kings.

His large black armour looked extremely bad-arse, but I think that’s the problem. The war has been raging for 10 years, though to be fair, it’s mainly been a war of attrition: The Greeks can not break into the city of Troy, and the Trojans can not make the Greeks leave.

So, my point is this: after 10 years, Agamemnon’s armour looked brand new. True, he would have had servants cleaning it for him, but it didn’t look like battle-hardened armour; it looked like it was freshly produced from the costume department. It was too shiny and clean.

Similarly, the first time we see the Trojans’ armour, they are riding on horseback towards Sinon. Sadly, like Agamemnon, their armour looked too neat, shiny, polished, new, and clean, rather than soldiers wearing armour that had seen 10 years of war. It took me out of the film; it wasn’t believable.

Another thing that took me out of the film was the casting, but it’s not what you’re thinking. Essentially, we had a film that featured Jason Bourne, Catwoman, Spider-Man, Batman, Nakia, Alpha, Violator, Mary Jane, Furiosa, The Punisher, and Shadowcat. I realise actors play fictional and non-fictional characters, but more importantly, they are more than their most famous roles. However, they can sometimes get type-casted, where we had scenes between Catwoman and Spider-Man, Batman and Violator, Punisher and Nakia, and everybody else in between.

It felt strange watching Peter Parker and Frank Castle go hunting, along with Bruce Wayne trying to marry Selena Kyle, but also Shadowcat, Mary Jane, and Alpha being angry with Jason Bourne. As I said earlier, it took me out of the movie at times, which, to be honest, is quite rare.

It reminded me of the time when I saw Les Misérables with my girlfriend (future wife) at the cinema. It was her favourite musical, so she was singing along with the rest of the audience, while I was watching a film about Wolverine raising Catwoman’s daughter, while being chased by Jor-El. I mentioned this to her after the film, and she was not impressed.

I was also let down by how Scylla looked, but I did like her nest. I was hoping her definitions would be clearer, but what do I know? As for Helios’ Cattle, I thought they would look grander than they did, though in hindsight, I realise why they chose to leave the cattle looking normal.

So, what about my preview questions?

  • Will the film open with an exposition about the Trojan War? There was a single line at the start, but nothing else.
  • Will the film start in the Iliad, and move into the Odyssey, or will it be told with flashbacks? It was a Nolan film, so it was told using a non-linear timeline.
  • How graphic will the battle scenes be, or the monsters killing Odysseus’ men? I could be wrong about this, but to my memory, there were only three battle scenes, and they were intense for very different reasons.
  • How will Nolan mark the passage of time in the film? Since Nolan did his time manipulation with the narrative, the biggest indicator of the passage of time was Odysseus’ beard, along with the growing age of Argos, Telemachus, and Eumaeus.
  • Will there be an epilogue? There wasn’t an epilogue in the traditional sense, but the film did leave us with Odysseus abdicating the Kingdom of Ithaca to Telemachus, as well as patching up his marriage with Penelope.
  • Tom Holland is 30 years old, so is it believable that he is playing a 20-year-old man whose mother is Anne Hathaway? I’ll be honest, the age difference bothered me more than I thought it would. Hathaway is 43 years old, while Holland is 30, playing a 20-year-old. Both Hathaway and Holland were fantastic, but I felt that either Hathaway was too young for the role or Holland was too old.
  • How much screen time will be given to Odysseus’ return to Ithaca? It was difficult to determine, because, being Christopher Nolan, the film’s timeline was out of order.
  • Will we see the plough and donkey scene? Sadly, no, we didn’t.
  • Will a 21st-century perspective be placed on the film, considering it is set over 3,000 years ago? I’ve covered this earlier, but yes, the destruction and sacking of Troy brought this into focus.
  • Will conservatives be correct that the woke casting choices derail the movie? Honestly, the casting of Elliot Page and Lupita Nyong’o was great; seriously, the movie was not derailed by them. Anybody who says that to you they are lying.
  • How will the monster be shown? CGI or practical effects or both? I think it was a combination of both. I believe Charybdis, the Laestrygonians, and Polyphemus were practical effects, but Scylla was different.
  • How will Calypso and Circe be portrayed? I thought Charlize Theron and Samantha Morton were awesome, with each actress showing how dangerous and fragile their characters were.
  • Can the sacking and destruction of Troy be laid at Odysseus’ feet? Once again, I have already discussed, I believe the answer is yes.
  • How much PTSD will Odysseus have, if any? A lot. Odysseus would have kept a therapist very busy and wealthy.
  • How will Nyong’o go with her dual roles? I thought her role as Helen was small, while Clytemnestra was even smaller.
  • Will there be any other appearances of Greek Gods, apart from Athena? If there were, I missed them.
  • Will Aeneas be mentioned or shown? To the best of my knowledge, no, he wasn’t.

Again, please remember that this review wasn’t about a comparison between the poem and the movie. Overall, The Odyssey is amazing, especially with the grounded use of practical effects, but would you expect anything less from a Nolan movie?

And that brings another rant to a close for another week. Thanks once again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, dance on the FIFA Forward Enterprise’s grave, and I’ll see you next week for the final preview/review for the Winter series, with Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Three down, one to go! Booya!