The Right to Choose: A Global View

I want to discuss the elephant in the room. Why? I had something completely different lined up for this blog. It was another half-arsed attempt to be funny, talking about certain aspects of pop culture. However, after the decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court, I felt I needed to write about something else.

Firstly, should a non-American, white male like myself, have an opinion about the state of abortion in the United States of America? To be honest, I’m not smart enough to answer that question.

Ok, so how is abortion viewed around the world then? Good question, but it’s not an easy answer.


Image by WikiImages from Pixabay

Here in New Zealand, abortion was decriminalised through the Abortion Legislation Act 2020, thus removing it from the Crimes Act 1961.

In relation to that, the countries and autonomous jurisdictions that will be discussed, will vary in their U.N. recognition, but also some of them are divided into different states or regions. This of course means what you can do in one part of the country, could be illegal in another part; in regards to the age of the fetus. These include Mexico, Australia (though decriminalised), United Kingdom, and of course, the United States of America.

The reasons for an abortion can be divided into different groups: on request, social and economic, fetal impairment or health, rape, risk to the mother’s health, and risk to the mother’s life. For the context of this blog, miscarriages will not be classified as abortions.

The total number of countries and autonomous jurisdictions discussed is 232.

There are 10 nations (Abkhazia, Andorra, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Honduras, Madagascar, Malta, Nicaragua, The Philippines, and the Vatican City) where abortion is illegal in all forms; even the risk to the mother’s life.

There are 62 nations where abortion is illegal, up to and including the risk to the mother’s health.

There are 93 nations where abortion is illegal, up to and including the rape of the mother. Let that sink in. 93 nations say that if you are raped and become pregnant, you are legally required to carry the baby to full term, otherwise it’s a crime. (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_law)

Each year around the world, there are an estimated 40-50 million abortions. This equals to approximately 125,000 abortions per day, according to WHO data. (Source: https://www.worldometers.info/abortions/)

Basically this can be summarised here:

  • Banning abortions, does not stop abortions from happening, no matter where you are in the world. All you are doing is putting the mother at greater risk.
  • Unintended pregnancy rates are higher in nations that heavily restrict abortion access to women, and lower with nations where abortion support is more accessible and legal.
  • The percentage of unintended pregnancies that end in abortion, in nations that restrict abortion, have increased over the last 30 years.
  • The global unintended pregnancy rate, per 1,000 women of reproductive age (15–49), has been decreasing since 1990–1994 from 79 to 64.
  • Between 1990-1994, the amount of unintended pregnancies ending in abortion was 51%. This remained around the same through 2000­–2004; however it then increased to 61% by 2015–2019.
  • The global abortion rate decreased between 1990–1994 and 2000–2004, but it has returned to the high levels of the 1990s. (Source: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-worldwide)

If you are feel angry about the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade; if you feel a woman has the right to actually choose what happens to her body; you are not alone.

Regardless of the different boxes and labels we give yourselves and other people, whether its gender, religion, socioeconomic status, or anything else, you are allowed to care about this issue.

So if you do care, what can you do about it?

  • Identify your local or national abortion organisations or charity groups and donate to them. Regardless of the abortion status in your country, they need your money and support.
  • Contact your local political representative and ask them, where do they sit on this important issue.
  • Vote. It’s that simple. Vote to protect the pro-choice laws that exist in your country, or vote to dismantle the anti-abortion laws.

I realise this issue is quite sensitive and important, but before I go, I have to share this video. It’s one of the best videos I have ever seen about the abortion debate, so please watch it. It’s quite long, but it is so worth it.

Thanks for reading and letting me politely rant about this issue. Look after yourselves, I’ll see you next Monday.


Tim Sale: We lost another Tōtara

2022 is slowly becoming a crappy year for the comics industry, because another legendary artist has died. On 16th June, Tim Sale passed away in Seattle, Washington, U.S.A. He was 66 years old.

I can’t tell you what the first Tim Sale art I ever saw was, but I can sure as hell tell you that I liked it. I loved his work, because it was moody and edgy, but at the same time, it was classical and mythical.


Batman: The Long Halloween. Art by Tim Sale, DC Comics

To me, the way Tim used shadows on characters and the background, was an art form on its own. His art kicked so many different types of arse. From Marvel, there was Daredevil: Yellow, Hulk: Gray, Captain America: White and Spider-Man: Blue; which is regarded as one of the best Peter Parker stories ever.

And from DC, there was Superman for all Seasons, Catwoman: When in Rome, and…Batman. The way that Tim drew Batman’s cape, you would think the cape was actually alive and sentient, because of the way it moved.

His work on the various Batman projects was so powerful and mind crunching, that I can only offer this compliment: for me, Batman is synonymous with Tim Sale, like Tim Sale is synonymous with Batman.1

His work has had an impact on me, and it still does to this day. Thank you, Tim.

Thanks for reading, avoid Sour Cream and Chives, and I’ll see you next Monday.


1 I’m really sorry if I have forgotten to mention any of Tim’s other work.

Why I hate Chilli and Bandit Heeler

I want to talk about Bluey, in particular her quintessential parents, Chilli and Bandit Heeler. Before I go any further, I feel I need to explain who and what Bluey actually is, before Mum and Dad are brought back into the picture.

Bluey, Bluey, Bluey…. I feel millions of parents around the world 1, would be able to give various explanations, impressions, confessions of love, or expletive laden statements about Bluey, but here is mine.

Bluey is an animated tv show, based on a now, seven year old Blue Heeler puppy, aptly named, Bluey. She lives her now, five year old Red Heeler sister, Bingo. The Heelers sisters have shenanigans left, right and centre, mainly through their dramatic and role playing games.

As the viewer, you get to meet their friends, cousins, uncles, aunties, grandparents, teachers, and other members of the community. To the best of my knowledge; because I have not seen every single episode, every character in the show is some type of dog.

UMC1 and UMC2 love Bluey. UMC2 has a Bluey plate and a new Bluey toothbrush, while UMC1 has a Bluey drink bottle. Recently UMC1 was told at school that Bluey is only for babies, but the four of us will sit down to watch the episodes and laugh together.

Now the nature of this particular blog is not to confession my love of the show. Remember the title of the blog? It’s time to talk about Chilli and Bandit Heeler.


Bandit, Bluey, Bingo and Chilli Heeler

Chilli is Bluey and Bingo’s mother and she also works part-time for security at an airport. She is a Red Heeler, just like Bingo; where as Bandit is a Blue Heeler, just like Bluey. Bandit is also an archaeologist, because apparently he likes to dig up bones.

So why do I hate these two cartoon dogs? Well, hate could be too strong of a word. I feel that Chilli and Bandit are some of the best parents, television has seen in a long time. The case being is that they’re too good. Their parenting skills are so excellent, that real world parents are just going to fail, when compared to Chilli and Bandit; myself included.

The biggest problem is that they somehow set completely unrealistic expectations in the real world. That’s what they do. Chilli and Bandit always have time for the girls. Now like I said before, I haven’t seen every episode, but from the few that I have seen, Bandit has only gone to work twice; but he’s always hanging about at home?!

Bandit never seems to bring work home, or attend any meetings at night; he’s just awesome. It’s the same issue for Chilli as well. She always seems to knows how to sort it out any problem, which is part of the show’s charm, because not everything goes the way it should.

I meant to point out that Bluey would be UMC1 in our house, with Bingo being UMC2. It’s also quite tragic that I find myself being enviousness of two cartoon dogs, because they seem to be far better parents than anybody!

This does make me look at what I do in the weekend, and how much I should be playing with my boys. Damn you, Chilli and Bandit!

My wife and I sit down with the boys, to watch the show with them. We laugh along with the madness, but after the episode, we will have a little talk to ourselves about how that could never be us. Chilli and Bandit are so patient, it sucks.

I fear my patience needs to be renewed every day. It’s a finite source, that somehow it’s regenerated in my sleep; but then again, I’m a parent, so I’m always tired. As soon as I wake up, my patience starts to deteriorate.

I would really like to see a Bluey episode that doesn’t have any children in it. It would just have Chilli and Bandit going about their lives, but following the utter carnage of living with children. Having a scene before the children eat breakfast in the kitchen vs what happened afterwards, would be ideal. Having lots of before and after scenes would be hilarious and would make me feel better about my own parenting.

I don’t know what else I can say, other than the show is amazing; however Bandit and Chilli, make you want to sign up for parenting courses. Oh, I forgot. We now have in our house, the brand new word, dunny. Previously, it was a toilet, but now the boys love using the word dunny, and especially, dunny hands. The word dunny, did not exist in this house until Bluey. Also wars have nearly been declared in this house, because of dunny hands. Thanks Bluey and Bingo. Cheers.

There is one slither of pleasure I do get from the show. It’s the fact I get to say, dude, a lot more often, especially to my wife; because she now calls me, bro, but only when UMC1 and UMC2 can hear. It’s their turn to roll their eyes at us.

Anyway, thanks for letting me rant. I appreciate it. There is a special blog for Wednesday, so please watch out for it. Look after yourselves, and I’ll see you then.


1 The Earth is not flat.

My five favourite Saga covers (So far)

I want to talk about Saga. Why? Well let’s be honest shall we? After my last four blogs about the morally bankrupt Tories, I thought it might be nice to talk about something, that actually makes me happy; like watching rugby, and eating salt and vinegar chips.

After waiting 41 months, Saga is back and I’m pretty stoked.1 For those unlucky people that have no idea what Saga is or what it’s about, I’ll try and keep it brief. Saga is a monthly 2 comic book that’s published by Image Comics. It’s written by Brian K. Vaughan and illustrated by Fiona Staples, since the release of #1, back in March 2012.

This book is good. Seriously good. The book, Vaughan and Staples, have won multiple Eisner, Harvey, Hugo, and various other comic book awards. I’ve been very blessed that I started reading Saga with #1, so I try to convert anybody to the title. 3

Now I’m not going to bore you with a rant about Saga’s plot or why you really should read it 4, however what I am going to discuss, are my five favourite Saga covers. Basically, this is for fun and Fiona Staples is a kick arse artist.

At the time of writing this blog, Saga is on Chapter 59, otherwise known as #59. The covers I’m going to discuss are not ranked by awesomeness, but by the order of their release.

Also, just because certain other covers did not make this list, it’s not because they suck; because they don’t. I just can’t have a list of 59 covers, I need to sleep, eat, work, and play Lego with UMC1 and UMC2.

Sweet as?


Saga #16: November 2013

Saga #16, Art by Fiona Staples

As soon as I first saw this cover, I liked it. I’m not sure whether it’s because of the contrast of colours, or the image of Upsher and Doff, putting themselves in harm’s way, in search of the truth; or maybe it’s both of them. The cover is a great indicator to their personalities and their motivation.

Also having Upsher writing, “Please Do Not Kill,” on a helmet, is a nice, but funny touch. I love this cover. It’s so striking.


Saga #34: February 2016

Saga #34, Art by Fiona Staples

This cover features of my favourite characters from the series: Ghüs. He’s such a cool character, you just want to pick him up and tickle his belly. And of course, he is chilling with Friendo, his walrus creature.

To me, it’s just a simple scene that highlights Ghüs’ personality and his lifestyle. The blurry reflection of the two characters, helps to draw your attention to the beautiful sky in the background. The only thing missing from the cover, is Ghüs’ battle axe. This cover is utterly gorgeous.


Saga #38: September 2016

Saga #38, Art by Fiona Staples

I have mixed feelings about this cover. On one hand, you get to see the relationship between Hazel and her ghost-babysitter, Izabel. With Izabel’s shape shifting abilities on display, you get to see how much fun the two characters can have with each other, but also how important they actually are. Plus, the use of various shades of pink is quite impressive.

This of course leads us to the other feelings: anger, and grief. Izabel was such an amazing character and being a ghost, you thought she would be safe to protect Hazel, and to be in her life. Wow, we were wrong.

Looking at this stunning cover, I’m reminded of how the characters interconnect with each other; which is the strength of the book. I’m also reminded that sadly, no character in the book is safe.


Saga #39: October 2016

Saga #39, Art by Fiona Staples

Having the previous issue cover saturated with pink, this cover is surrounded by purple. Petrichor is shown here in all her beautiful detail, with magic lighting the foreground, while darkness is crawling around the edges.

I also think Petrichor paints a haunted image, to go along with the haunted past and her outlook on life. I’m not sure what else I can say about this cover, except that it’s evocative and extremely effective.


Saga #41: January 2017

Saga #41, Art by Fiona Staples

I found this cover to be fun, because of Alana’s and Marko’s stances. Alana is on brand, by firing a weapon, willing to kill anybody to protect her family. Marko is also reflecting his personality by wielding a shield, like his pacifist nature.

The use of various shades of green, at least to me, brings out some sort of neutrality to the cover, because of the happy couple’s opposite natures. I feel it works. It’s also the last cover, where Alana and Marko are on it together; minus Hazel. It’s just husband and wife, against the galaxy. It’s a cool image.

But then again, what do I know? Nothing, except that Sour Cream and Chives is the worst. I’d rather lick my dog’s paws, than eat any product of that flavour.

In conclusion, these are my five favourite Saga covers. Do you read Saga? What are your favourite covers?

Ok, that’s it from me today. Thanks for reading, wash your hands, look after yourselves, and I’ll see you next Monday.


1 Lying Cat would not have a problem with I just said.

2 Saga is one of the few monthly titles I read anymore.

3 I converted my wife to Saga. She saw me reading, what she thought was a soft porn comic book. After explaining the plot and her reading the trades to catch up, we now read the new issue of Saga together, when it arrives by post. Ahhh…romance.

4 You really should though. Trust me, I’m a geek.

Final score: Johnson’s Tories-211, Morality-148

This is a quick follow up from yesterday’s post. The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Boris Johnson (It’s been nearly 3 years, but I still have trouble with that statement), faced a no-confidence vote against his own Conservative Party, know as the Tories.

To remove Boris as leader and Prime Minister, over 180 Tory MPs needed to vote against him. I hate to break it to you, but the Tories failed. What a surprise.



211 Tory MPs voted for Boris, while 148 Tory MPs voted against him. The result is that he gets to stay at 10 Downing St; for at least the time being.

Even though Boris and the government have stated that this result has given them a victory, so they can continue to level up the UK, it’s just a victory on paper; it’s very thin.

59% of Tory MPs have supported Boris, but 41% don’t. To put it another way, 2 out of every 5 Tory MPs, do not support their own leader. That’s insane.

If this result is truly a victory for Boris, it’s a pyrrhic victory; like the Battle of the Alamo, the Battle of Bunker Hill, the Battle of Hoth, or recently, the Siege of Mariupol. You’ve won the battle, but just so you can lose the war.

This vote is actually the beginning of the end for Boris Johnson and the Tories. They may have survived this round, but the British public will not forget this; especially at the next election.

Thanks for reading Some Geek Told Me. It actually means a lot to me. Look afterwards yourselves, and I’ll see you next Monday.


The Sue Gray Report of the 10 Downing St shenanigans: Part Three

Kia ora and welcome to the third part of my tiny blog, looking at the 10 Downing St shenanigans, covered in the Sue Gray report. Today is the final chapter in a trilogy that nobody asked for, because nobody realised how incompetent Boris Johnson’s government truly were.

Actually, I feel that’s a falsehood. I think millions of people realised that, before the report.

This final nugget of haughtiness is quite special, because it’s a 2-for-1 deal; or maybe it’s buy 1, get 1 free. Take your pick of egotism, narcissism, and irresponsible behaviour, from the Tories finest.

Part Three: Double Trouble

On 16th April 2021, 10 Downing St did not just have one gathering, but two! The United Kingdom had moved to Step 2, of lifting restrictions of the second national lockdown. There was still to be no indoor social gathering at people’s homes, but also social distancing needed to be maintained at the work place.

Here we go…



For the third time, I’ll let the report explain the situation:

Two leaving events took place on 16 April 2021. One, the event for James Slack
and the other, an event to mark the departure of a No 10 official. This latter event
was organised on the day, by email which sent at 16.26 by a No 10 official to the
No 10 Digital team, No 10 Press Office, Events & Visits and others.

There was no scheduled time for the event on the invitation. This email invitation included a Microsoft Teams link so that individuals could attend virtually and was called ‘[No 10 official] Leaving Presentation’. The location was the No 10 Digital Team office
which is situated in the basement of No 10.

The Digital team is part of the No 10 Press Office team and there was considerable
overlap in attendance at the two events. The first, for James Slack, began at
approximately 18.30, with speeches in the Press Office. He wished to thank his
team members individually and to set out future direction for the team. It lasted for
around an hour and there were approximately 45 people in total in attendance both
in the office and with a small number online.

Those present in person came from across No 10, including senior officials. Some joined the event virtually. Wine and beer had been bought by staff and was consumed by some during the speeches. Following the speeches, some staff returned to work but others continued chatting and drinking. They remained for some time and were present when the building 35 was being locked down for the evening. Those still present were asked to leave the building by a No 10 custodian.

The group then moved into the No 10 garden. The second event, for the other No 10 official, was held in the offices of the Digital Team in the basement of No 10. It began at approximately the same time as the event for the Director of Communications, at around 18.00, but was smaller in scale, with 15-20 people present, including a special adviser and more junior officials. There were leaving speeches and a presentation.

Wine was available and music was played from a laptop on top of a printer. A number of those present drank excessively. There was mingling between the two events, with some staff moving up and down the stairs in between the basement and the Press Office.

The two groups eventually joined together in the Downing Street garden. Shortly before 21.30, there were over 20 people present in the garden, with a number of bottles of
alcohol.

A number of individuals gathered near a child’s swing/slide in the garden,
damaging it by leaning on and playing with it. This was noticed the next morning
and reported to No 10 staff.

At this time, the custodian staff at No 10 continued to lock down the building. They
noted that groups of individuals had gone into the garden. The group began to
break up and return into the main building at around 21.30.

The No 10 entry logs show that a number of people left No 10 at this point. They
were encouraged by the custodian to use the rear exit of No 10. Some individuals
remained in the building and carried on drinking alcohol until the early hours. Exit
logs indicate that some left after midnight and others between 01.45-02.45. Two
members of staff stayed later still, with one leaving at 03.11 and the last leaving at
04:20.

Wow. Utter madness. Two leaving parties occurred on the same day at 10 Downing St, with alcohol and speeches, which left a child’s playground equipment damaged. My questions about these amateurish and botched social events are as follows:

  • Did Jacob Rees-Mogg attend any of the gatherings? Was he emailed an invitation by accident?
  • How bad were the speeches that alcohol was needed to help people survive them?
  • Did any of the speeches mention that The Batman, was pushed back to October 2021? What were people’s thoughts about this?
  • How many arses did the custodian(s) have to kick that night?
  • How many £3 bottles of wine were consumed from the local off license?
  • Who played DJ for the evening or was it a team effort?
  • What was the most popular song of the evening? Was it The Gambler, by Kenny Rogers?
  • When the two groups joined together, was it a turf war, like the Sharks and the Jets, in West Side Story?
  • Has the person that damaged the swing/slide in the garden, ever been identified? Has Scotland Yard, MI5, James Bond, or Sherlock Holmes opened an investigation yet?
  • Who were the two staff members that stayed until 3.11 am and 4.20 am? Was Tinder involved?

When thousands of children across the country were unable to attend birthday parties, or invite their friends to their own parties; because they were following the rules, the Tories threw two parties on the same night, at 10 Downing St!

I would say this would be disgraceful behaviour, but that’s an understatement about this shameful mess.

Boris Johnson and the Tories have only apologised to the public, because they were caught. They did not apologise straight after the events. Please remember that at the next general election.

Two things to close with:

1.) Thank you to the photographer(s) for taking the photos on 19th June 2020, and 13th November 2020, during those social events. The Tories look dishonest and hilarious at the same time. The photos are priceless and beautiful.

2.) Boris Johnson will be facing a no-confidence vote by Tory MPs, on 6th June, between 6 p.m. and 8 p.m. (UK time). To remove him as leader, over 180 Tory MPs have to vote against him. Here’s hoping those Tory MPs will sack him. We’ll have to wait for the result, but whatever happens, I’ll let you know, because, like I have nothing else to do.

Stay tuned for the result. Until then, thanks for reading, wash your hands, and I’ll see you soon.

PS: I couldn’t resist adding this. I’m very childish.


The Sue Gray Report of the 10 Downing St shenanigans: Part Two

Welcome back to Part Two of the 10 Downing St shenanigans, as mentioned in the Sue Gray Report. If you’re not sure what you’re reading, don’t panic; it happens to me all the time. I really mean that.

Just read my previous blog about Part One, and hopefully you’ll be brought up to speed on Boris Johnson’s government, causing calamity, carnage and catastrophes, during the United Kingdom COVID-19 lockdowns and restictions.

So, let’s move onto the second part:

Part Two: Secret Santa

This 10 Downing St apocalyptic event, was held on the 18th December 2020, three days after the quiz event. Before we go on, please remember that the United Kingdom was still under a second national lockdown, which required people to stay at home, with no more than two people from other households for indoor gatherings, leading up to and around Christmas. Remember that.


Image by paulbloch from Pixabay

Once again, I’ll let the report explain the situation:

The 18 December 2020 was a Friday, when the weekly Press Office meeting and
“Wine Time Friday” would have normally taken place. It was also the last working
Friday of 2020 and there was a desire to mark the occasion.

Some work did take place in the Press Office and No 10 whilst this event was
underway, in relation to the ongoing negotiations on a trade deal ahead of the UK’s
exit from the EU scheduled for 31 December 2020; and on the emergence of the
Delta variant of Covid 19, raising issues of what Covid restrictions would be
necessary over the Christmas period with announcements being made the next
day.

A number of senior members of the Press Office attended or observed
relevant meetings and discussed follow up action. The event started by about 18.00 which was later than scheduled. It took place in the same space as the leaving event on 27 November 2020, in the area just outside the No 10 Press Office.

A Secret Santa gift exchange took place. There was also a quiz.
An awards ceremony took place, at around 19.45. A No 10 official sent a message
to one of the WhatsApp groups at 19.49 stating “prize giving now guys, return”. The
investigation was informed that this was an extension of the type of awards
ceremony which might take place on “Wine Time Friday”.

Those present gathered together at the meeting table in the small area outside the main Press Office. Awards certificates were handed out to staff by Jack Doyle, a senior special
adviser. There were about 30 certificates prepared, although not all those awarded
certificates were present. The ceremony lasted between 10-25 minutes and
between 15 and 45 people were in the room during that time.

At approximately 19.45 that evening, a panic alarm button was accidentally
triggered by a member of staff. The custodians on duty responded, as did one of
the police officers on No 10 door duty. They observed a large number of people in
the area outside of the main Press Office and one individual giving a speech. Inside
the Press Office a further 15-20 people were present.

There was food and alcohol available which had been bought and brought in by
staff. Some members of staff drank excessively. The event was crowded and noisy such that some people working elsewhere in the No 10 building that evening heard
significant levels of noise coming from what they characterised as a “party” in the
Press Office. A cleaner who attended the room the next morning noted that there
had been red wine spilled on one wall and on a number of boxes of photocopier
paper.

The event lasted for several hours, with varying levels of attendance throughout,
including because officials left to attend official meetings. Attendance peaked
during the awards ceremony. No 10 exit logs show a number of members of staff
remaining in the office until after midnight.

So, to recap the sequence of absurd events: A party was held at 10 Downing St, with 15-45 people attending. Food and alcohol were served, along with playing another quiz, with Secret Santa presents and awards were given out.

Let’s also remember, that some person; drunk no doubt, set off the panic alarm button and red wine was spilled on the wall, and on some boxes. My questions about this idiotic debauchery are as follows:

  • Did Jacob Rees-Mogg compete in the quiz? What was his score? (Same question as last time)
  • Did Boris Johnson receive a Secret Santa gift? If so, what was it?
  • Did Boris Johnson give a Secret Santa gift? Is it possible to return it to the discount bin at ASDA?
  • Are “Wine Time Fridays” still going on at 10 Downing St?
  • Has Nigel Farage ever turned up to whine about the EU and immigrants?
  • Was anybody unhappy with their Secret Santa gift?
  • Can we return Boris Johnson back to Henley?
  • Has WhatsApp come out and said, “Don’t you dare drag us into this mess!”
  • Did Jack Doyle have a good night? Did he give himself a certificate?
  • What were the certificates for? ie Most affairs in the year, Highest number of sex scandals in a year, Lowest IQ (who could tell?), The highest number of laws broken in a year, The greatest amount of lies told to the British people in a single day.
  • Who was the imbecile that set off the panic alarm? No really, who was it?
  • Was the cleaner given a bonus, for cleaning up Tory left overs?

While the British public were saying their final goodbyes to their loved ones, via Zoom, the Tories were having a Friday night bender at 10 Downing St. Disgraceful does not even scratch the surface of this insult. They made the rules. They enforced the rules. They just didn’t follow them. I wonder if their parents or children are proud of them?

I’m actually doing this without swearing, so I think I’m doing alright. That’s all from me tonight, because my dog is asleep on my pillow again, so I need to set up the couch. I’ll see you on Monday for the third and final part of the Sue Gray report. Until then, thanks for reading, wash your hands and remember to breathe.