Movie Review: Clayface

But I would walk five hundred kilometres
And I would walk five hundred more
Just to be the geek who walked a thousand kilometres to fall down at your door of the cinema

I know, The Proclaimers did (and still do) a far better job at this song than I ever will. However, that’s alright, because I’m not a songwriter; if that wasn’t already self-evident.

No, what I am is someone who suffers from delusions of grandeur, thinking I can make a difference in this mad world. Hence, I pick myself up and try again with another movie review. As keen readers of this popular website, you would have read my blog post about my preview for Clayface, so obviously, here is the sequel: the review about Clayface. If you missed the preview, you can find it here.

Clayface opened in New Zealand on 22nd October and has earned $91.8 million at the box office (At the time of writing). I saw it on Tuesday the 27th, having secured a ticket. You know how this story goes, as I have told it many times, because it never changes too much.

  • I walk into the cinema with my ticket.
  • I take out a personal loan to purchase items from the snack bar.
  • I walk into the theatre and sit down, without anyone asking to see the ticket.

Like the Mongols, there is an exception this time. Usually, on a Tuesday night, because that’s when I usually go to the cinema, the theatre has anywhere from an average of 10-15 people. However, there was only one person in the theatre: me. Now, I need to set the scene, because I got there late, walked in and found my seat.

After sitting down, I noticed nobody else was there, but thought it was fine, because the film still had another eight minutes to start. That time came and went, and as the adverts started, it struck me that I was going to be alone in the cinema. That had not happened since, I believe, X-Men: Apocalypse.

Added to the fact that I knew that I was going to watch a horror movie, in the dark and completely alone, the trailer for The Exorcist: Martyrs came on. “Fuck, no!” I said to myself. You couldn’t pay me enough to see that film in a cinema. No way. The creeping sensations of fear and anxiety were starting to infect me, and I knew, I knew, that was going to be a film I would have absolutely 100% no desire to ever see.

And of course, I reached that decision, sitting in a dark theatre, alone, waiting for an R16 horror movie to start. The things I do for this account, the things I do. That trailer set the tone for me. Cool.

Since one of my questions was how many people Clayface was going to kill, I was prepared to create a tally chart on my phone. I was uber prepared, just like the Dark Knight, if Bruce Wayne had a fiction addiction. And with that, dear readers, let’s move on to the next stage of this delightful endeavour and go over the rules of the review.

1.) Please be aware there will be spoilers concerning the movie, so proceed with extreme anxiety and caution.

2.) The aim of my reviews are not to rip apart the subject or trash it. If I liked the subject enough to watch it, then I’ll give my honest (possibly biased) opinion.

3.) I’m not a professional critic, so I’m not going to dive into deeper concepts and themes, or the art of filmmaking. I’m just a geek; always have been, and always will be.

The coin has been flipped, hands have been shaken, so it’s time for kick-off! Let the wild rumpus review begin!


Credit: Warner. Bros/DC Studios and my local cinema

To begin, we must always acknowledge the first question: did I like Clayface? I have to admit that I did, which surprised me, mainly because it was an R16 horror movie. I would usually never watch this type of movie.

Things I liked:

I’ll be working in no order other than how I remember them. I thought Tom Rhys Harries’ portrayal of Matt Hagen was excellent, as in, he showed Hagen’s humble beginnings from the Narrows in Gotham to Coast City (Green Lantern, anybody?) He did a fantastic job of showing Hagen’s emotions before the attack, but also after it.

The low-budget aspect can be observed within the movie; however, that wasn’t exactly a negative thing. If we are staying within the DCU, it costs a lot of money to show Kryptonians flying around and smashing things, while on alien planets or pocket dimensions. On the other hand, you can spend a lot less money using real-world sets, without the need for a green screen for every second scene. To me, it gave the impression that the city was real and well-lived in. I felt the low-budget vibe of Gotham was quite strong, especially with rubbish everywhere.

I have recently discovered something: if I’m ever invited to go to a nightclub in Gotham, the answer is no. Hell, no!

And speaking of Gotham, that nightclub scene where Hagen was dancing and the dancers were copying his moves- wow, that was creepy as hell, and I loved it! It’s probably going to be on a list of classic horror scenes like the shower scene from Psycho, or the defibrillator scene from The Thing.

For Hagen’s descent into villainy, it was subtle and quite well done. As the viewer, you can empathise with him after the attack; though he was a douche dag, nobody deserves his punishment. Anyway, as the film develops, so do Hagen’s abilities, and his control of them. His first kill, Frank Fitzpatrick, was an accident; his second, Corey, was murder, yet he didn’t start out to kill him.

From this point, you understand that the body count is going to just start climbing, with Hagen going on a warpath of vengeance. You’re rooting for him to succeed; he is the hero of the piece, as all the people he kills are evil. It’s easy to simplify this, and I’m sorry.

In addition to this, the support you give Hagen fades away after John Borrelli, the police detective, interviews him. From that moment on, you realise that Hagen will cross that line from seeking revenge on his enemies to killing innocent people. And of course, when Hagen does indeed kill Borrelli, his transformation into a full-blown villain is complete, almost like Anakin Skywalker becoming Darth Vader after killing the younglings.

As for the way Hagen killed people, he was very creative and resourceful. This, of course, leans heavily into the horror genre, which, for sheer conscience, is one of the great tropes used in these movies: jump scares. The scene where Caitlyn Corr is monitoring Hagen while he was asleep, actually made me jump when he rolled over, and he has transformed into Fitzpatrick. That was quick and effective.

Clayface also achieved a rare event in making a scene unwatchable for me. I do need to point out that it wasn’t because it was terrible. The scene where Hagen is experimenting with his newly discovered powers by cutting his face, just to watch the blood travel back into his body and heal itself, was too much for me.

Remember that I’m not a horror fan, so watching an R16 movie alone, in the dark, observing a character cut up his own face just to see what would happen, was too much for me, as I had to look away. That was horrifying and gorgeous at the same time.

Things I disliked:

Actually, there wasn’t a lot.

I feel Dredd and Clayface have a lot in common, mainly because they both had small budgets, and they had an R rating. That in itself is not a terrible thing because of the content. But many people who are under 16 years old and fans of Batman, DC Comics, superheroes, or comic book adaptations would be unable to watch the film. That would ultimately be reducing the box office returns.

It was interesting that nobody seemed to know anything about Corr’s research, though her treatments did work. Why was she not well known in the medical community?

As for Clayface’s final reveal, it was interesting to see that his face was asymmetrical. True, his face looked grotesque, and I think that was the point, but I’ve seen too many animated and comic book versions of Clayface’s symmetrical face to like something else.

So, what about my preview questions?

  • Which world is Clayface set in: Robert Pattinson’s The Batman or David Corenswet’s Superman? The film didn’t give too much away, but DC Studios explained that Clayface was set in the DCU, which is part of David Corenswet’s Superman‘s world.
  • Since Clayface is set in Gotham, will it be before or during Batman being active? That was harder to judge, so the jury is out on that one; though if I were a betting man, I would say Batman was active.
  • Will any famous Gotham citizens make a cameo? If there were, I totally missed them.
  • Will there be any references to former or ex-Clayface characters? There were a few. Firstly, the studio lot that Hagen entered was called Imperial Pictures. This was the same name as the studio that Hagen worked out of in the Batman: The Animated Series “Feat of Clay.” Secondly, Hagen watched a broadcast detailing the nominees for an award event. The funny thing is that two of the movies, No Man’s Land and One Bad Day, are references to Batman storylines.
  • How many people will Clayface kill? I counted 10 people that he killed.
  • What will be the most horrific death? To be honest, take your pick. Each one was different and brutal.
  • Will the plot make any sense? It actually did, but I have already covered this.
  • Will Hagen be a hero, villain, or anti-hero? He started as a jerk, then victim, then anti-hero, and finally (de)evolved into a villain.
  • Will there be a Batman reference? Again, to the best of my knowledge, it would be a no, as a direct reference.
  • What will, if any, the fight scenes look like? There weren’t that many fight scenes, but they were effective and brutal.
  • How much will the movie lean into body horror vs thriller? I’m not an expert on body horror, but Clayface seemed like a mixture of The Fly and The Substance, which is not a bad thing.
  • How will Hagen be transformed? After the knife attack and multiple surgeries, Hagen turned to Corr for treatment, which involves experimental nanobots. The nanobots redesign Hagen, which allows him to develop different abilities, and after he is tasered and the kill switch is activated, Hagen transforms into a roaring clay monster.
  • Will the reduced amount of budget be obvious in the movie? It was obvious, but I believe it works in its favour.
  • Will Hagen’s downfall be tragic, believable or stupid? Hagen’s downfall is completely tragic because it could have been avoided.

I had the impression that a huge number of people had written Clayface off, and didn’t expect much from it. True, it may not make $200 million, but the film does the precise job it needed to do. For a horror movie, this old geek could handle it.

But anyway, what do I know? Go out and see the movie for yourself, so you can be the judge. And that brings another exciting episode of New Zealand’s 5th least favourite website to a close. Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Please remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, follow the aftermath of the NZ general election, and I’ll see you next week.


Movie Preview: Clayface

I’ve been extremely busy running New Zealand’s 5th least favourite website, so I thought it was time to relax and enjoy the finer things in life. And what would that mean, I hear you ask? Why committing time and energy to another infamous Movie Preview/Review, of course, silly rabbit.

If you cast your mind back over winter (summer for some of you), I went on a bender, writing Movie Preview/Reviews for Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu, Supergirl, The Odyssey, and Spider-Man: Brand New Day. I’m going to do Avengers: Doomsday in December, and maybe, just maybe, Wicker in November, but that one is not confirmed. Yet, as the cookie crumbles over the plate, one film has been confirmed for our head writer to explore, and that is Clayface.

I’ve said this before, but I am an old creature of habit, so I’ll be sticking to my non-award-winning template for these preview/reviews. I hope that’s alright, because that’s all I can manage currently as I still enjoy being unconscious at night time.

So…Clayface. This will be DC Studios’ third feature DCU (DC Universe) film after 2025’s Superman and 2026’s Supergirl, which is part of Chapter One: Gods and Monsters. Of course, in saying that, the DCU already exists in the form of many live-action and animated television shows. I have not seen Lanterns yet, as I’m saving that for over the Christmas holidays.

We did see Clayface in Creative Commandos, which was the first entry into the DCU via a television show, which would predate the film…but I’m not sure what world Clayface is set in. However, I am leaning towards James Gunn’s DCU, rather than the offshoot world of Matt Reeves’ Gotham.

I got out of sync with the movie previews/reviews last time, but I remedied the situation by purchasing an advance ticket for Tuesday. I learnt my lesson, so advance tickets are still the way to go. Yes, it’s in the back row, because where else am I going to sit in the theatre?

Sony released a few live-action Spider-Man spin-off films like the Venom trilogy (seen all three), Morbius (not seen), Madame Web (not seen) and Kraven the Hunter (seen). Interestingly, Sony focused on three of Peter’s rogues’ gallery to flesh out their stories. DC and Warner Bros. did this with Black Adam (seen), Joker (seen), and Joker: Folie à Deux (not seen).

They seem to be following the trend of giving a few of the Caped Crusader’s rogues’ gallery some spotlight in the form of Clayface. He has been stirring up trouble for Batman since his first appearance in Detective Comics #40 (June 1940), and he hasn’t stopped. I need to point two things out about Clayface, which make him stand out from the costumed sociopaths and psychopaths that plague Gotham City.

Firstly, Clayface, like Killer Croc, is in a small group of Batman’s villains that actually have superhuman abilities. For this reason, and just like Killer Croc, this makes him a truly scary and underrated character. Secondly, Clayface is unique in another way, because he is a legacy character. So what does that mean?

Basically, a legacy character can be a villain or hero who either takes or is given the title of a pre-existing or established character. They can take the powers, equipment, and costume of the established character, as well as their name. The two characters generally have some sort of connection, but not always. To the best of my understanding, there have been possibly eight different characters that have taken the mantle of Clayface, with one of the most famous being Matt Hagen. And speaking of Matt Hagen, he’s the star of Clayface.

The film cost only US$30–44 million, compared to US$170 million for Supergirl, and US$225 million for Superman. Are DC Studios nervous about another film’s box office performance since both previous DCU film entries slightly underperformed? I have no idea. Also, I need to mention that Clayface is rated R16, at least in New Zealand.

Clayface was written by Mike Flanagan and Hossein Amini, and directed by James Watkins. As for the cast, we have Matt Hagen / Clayface (Tom Rhys Harries), Dr Caitlyn Corr (Naomi Ackie), John Borrelli (Max Minghella), with unrevealed roles with Wil Coban, Ruby Sear, Joshua James, Francesca Corney, David Dencik, Eddie Marsan and Nancy Carroll.

And with that out of the way, let’s dive into the seedy nightlife of Gotham City and see what makes Clayface tick!


Credit: NobodyQuiteLikeMe


Am I looking forward to watching Clayface?

I ask this question of all my prey1, as the answer is always the same: yes. As dedicated followers of this informative echo chamber will attest, one of my goals is to support movies based on comic books; basically, if we stop going to films, the studios will stop making them, and I don’t want that. So, here I am, yet again.

I remember watching Batman: The Animated Series, where Clayface was pure nightmare fuel; so he left an impression on me. For Hagen’s origin, I don’t know if the filmmakers will draw inspiration from Batman: The Animated Series, the comics, or some other place to explain and tell the story, or maybe it’s going to be something original.

Being a legacy Batman villain, I was surprised that the studios gave the green light for a movie about Clayface before Batman, considering there are a lot more famous and iconic villains that could possibly deserve their own movie. But, and hear me out, I wonder if that’s the issue.

From a live-action movie perspective, we have seen the Joker, the Penguin, Catwoman, Two-Face, the Riddler, Mr Freeze, Poison Ivy, Bane, Ra’s al Ghul, Scarecrow, Talia al Ghul, Harley Quinn, Deadshot, Black Mask, Killer Croc, and KGBeast. I think exposing audiences to a new-to-cinema, but old enemy, like Clayface, would be to entice the audience into the theatre. Hell, it’s working for me! Plus, we now have the filmmaking technology to display his powers properly.

What is the movie about?

According to Wikipedia, the premise is this:

After being brutally disfigured by a local mob boss, rising movie star Matt Hagen volunteers as a test subject to restore his original face but experiences a series of horrifying psychological and physical side effects that transform his body into living clay.

To build on this, my local cinema is advertising Clayface as:

“Clayface” unravels one man’s horrifying descent from rising Hollywood star to revenge-filled monster in a story that explores the loss of one’s identity and humanity, corrosive love, and the dark underbelly of scientific ambition.

What can we expect?

The running time is 108 minutes, just the same as Supergirl. Not too long, not too short; it’s in the Goldilocks zone.

One thing I’m looking forward to is the special effects, because as I understand it, Clayface’s abilities will be a blend of CGI and practical effects. I’m a fan of practical effects, not shitty and low-quality ones, but ones where you learn later it was a practical effect, and you are in awe of how the filmmakers did that.

In saying that, I also realise the advantages of having a big movie budget, which can bring Clayface to the silver screen. His regeneration, durability, stamina, and strength will be awesome to see, but, let’s face it, it’s his shapeshifting that brings all the boys to the yard. Whether it’s altering his face, body, or, my favourite, changing his limbs into weapons, will be a sight to behold.

I mentioned the budget before, but it needs to be mentioned again. Does DC Studios not fully believe in the film, because they only invested US$30–44 million, which in itself is hilarious, because that’s more money I’ll ever see in my lifetime. The point is that I hope the money has been invested in the plot and special effects, because Clayface is a fascinating character, and I want to see him as a beautiful and tragic nightmare.

One thing we can expect is Hagen going on a revenge rampage, which is why it’s marketed as a horror movie, instead of a supervillain movie. It does make sense, considering he’s a villain and an enemy of Batman; it’s going to be interesting to see how Tom Rhys Harries plays Matt Hagen. Will he be a hero, villain, or anti-hero?

Obviously, the accident (however or whatever it is) changes Hagen, but what was he like beforehand? I understand Hagen will be an actor, like the original Clayface, Basil Karlo. From there, I can only imagine bodies will start appearing.

I also wonder how similar the movie will be to Clayface’s origin in Batman: The Animated Series, with the Feat of Clay storyline. It introduced Matt Hagen, and you were witness to his tragic downfall and his rebirth as Clayface. Later on in my life of absorbing pop culture, Anakin Skywalker’s fall to the Dark Side and rebirth in Star Wars: Episode III- Revenge of the Sith reminded me of Clayface.

I guess I’m not sure what else to expect, as I want the DCU to succeed, so I’m trying to keep an open mind about it.

Do I have concerns?

What type of fan boy would I be if I didn’t have concerns?

  • Which world is Clayface set in: Robert Pattinson’s The Batman or David Corenswet’s Superman?
  • Since Clayface is set in Gotham, will it be before or during Batman being active?
  • Will any famous Gotham citizens make a cameo?
  • Will there be any references to former or ex-Clayface characters?
  • How many people will Clayface kill?
  • What will be the most horrific death?
  • Will the plot make any sense?
  • Will Hagen be a hero, villain, or anti-hero?
  • Will there be a Batman reference?
  • What will, if any, the fight scenes look like?
  • How much will the movie lean into body horror vs thriller?
  • How will Hagen be transformed?
  • Will the reduced amount of budget be obvious in the movie?
  • Will Hagen’s downfall be tragic, believable or stupid?

I’ll probably leave the theatre cursing myself for not thinking about a particular question, but that always happens. I hope Clayface is a success, though how you define success is up for debate; which I’ll discuss one day. However, it’s not today, nor next week.

It’s that time of year when I need to give you a heads-up about my Mid-Summer break that is coming up, which is just a fancy name for the Christmas holidays. I haven’t worked out the dates yet, but it will be happening in roughly eight weeks.

Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, keep watching the Rugby League World Cup, and I’ll see you next week for the Clayface Review. Look after yourself.


1 Who got that reference?