Tour of the Solar System: Charon

I was thinking the other day about what brilliant subject I could write about for the next blog post, when I realised that the decision had already been made for me. Yes, dear fans, it’s that time in the cycle when the greatest scientific communication of our age comes back for another round of fantastic nonsense. I have heard your prayers, and they have been answered!

Your waiting is over, for Some Geek Told Me’s Tour of the Solar System has returned once again for 2026. I know, the anticipation is immense. For previous courageous instalments, please see the list below:

1.) Meet the Family

2.) The Sun

3.) Planets vs. Dwarf planets

4.) Mercury

5.) Venus

6.) Earth

7.) The Moon

8.) Mars

9.) The Asteroid Belt

10.) Ceres

11.) Jupiter

12.) The Galilean moons

13.) Saturn

14.) Titan

15.) The Moons of Saturn

16.) Uranus

17.) Titania

18.) The Moons of Uranus

19.) The Literary Moons of Uranus

20.) Neptune

21.) Triton

22.) The Moons of Neptune

23.) The Kuiper Belt

24.) Pluto

For those of you who are counting, this is my 25th entry in the tour that nobody asks for. The world seems determined to tear itself apart, but rest assured, the quality of this account is still poor, just the way you like it. The new entry is about Charon, which I briefly mentioned last time, so without further time wasting, away we go!


Credit: NASA

I wasn’t sure if I would ever reach Charon. I thought I would have given up by now, but here we are. We’re going to break this celestial object down, just like the others, because that’s what happens on this account: a lot of repetition and bad jokes.

As discussed on the last tour stop on New Zealand’s fifth least favourite website, Charon is one of five known moons of Pluto, and it’s also the largest. Charon’s relationship with Pluto is much like a one-night stand without contraception; this is important, and it’s going to come back. We’ll discuss this later in a safe space.

Charon has a diameter of 1,212 km, which works out to be just over half of Pluto’s diameter. For the record, having a moon which is half the size of its parent planet is extremely odd. Like freaky odd. For comparison, the distance is roughly the same as travelling from Rome, Italy, to Tilburg, in the Netherlands. Charon is small, but it can still beat Ceres in a wrestling match, as well as being the 12th-largest moon in the Solar System.

Much like the discovery of penicillin, Charon’s discovery was by accident. In 1978, James Christy, an astronomer at the U.S. Naval Observatory, had been observing Pluto to refine and determine Pluto’s orbit around the Sun. After looking at some photographic plates, Christy noticed an elongated blob.

The way I understand it, Christy consulted another astronomer at the observatory, Robert Harrington. Together, they discovered photographic plates of Pluto dating back to 1965, with the same elongated blob. The blob turned out to be Charon, Pluto’s first discovered moon.

If you’re up on your Greek mythology, you would have recognised Charon as being named after the delightful gentleman, whose job was to ferry departed souls across the River Styx and Acheron, to the Underworld, which was ruled over by…Hades, the Greek equivalent of Pluto. Coincidentally, you may have also heard of the ancient custom of placing coins on the eyes of a corpse, as the money would serve as payment for Charon, to transport their soul.


Mosiac of New Horizons MVIC color observations of Charon obtained during the final 6.4 day rotation on approach to the system during July 7-14, shown in polar orthographic projection. Image by NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute

Remember that one-night stand from before? Well, the results are in, and congratulations, you’re going to be a parent! Charon orbits Pluto at a distance of roughly 19,640 km, which, in cosmic terms, is stalker-level status. This is only the start of Pluto and Charon’s freaky relationship.

To explain this, we need to take a sip of hot chocolate and concentrate, because we need to discuss Pluto’s barycenter. A barycenter, to the best of my understanding, is the most common centre of mass around which two or more cosmic objects orbit. These can include stars, planets, dwarf planets, and moons.

It can be referred to as the balance point, where gravity holds objects together within a system. This usually means the barycenter is located closer to the cosmic object with more mass, which can sometimes be located outside of the larger object. Earth’s barycenter with the Moon is situated within the Earth, about 4,671 km from its centre. Since the barycenter is not at the exact centre of the Earth, the Earth’s centre of mass follows a small, wobbly path around this point.

Another example is with the Sun-Earth barycenter, which can be found 449 km from the Sun’s centre, but it’s still inside the Sun. Since the Sun is so much larger than the Earth, the Sun also experiences a slight wobble. However, the Pluto-Charon barycenter is, once again, odd, because the point that they both orbit around is found not within Pluto, but rather outside of it.

This has led to both Pluto and Charon being mutually tidally locked to each other, which is another way of explaining that the same surfaces of Pluto and Charon are always facing each other. For more comparison, the Moon is tidally locked to Earth, but the Earth is not locked to the Moon.

Because of these facts, Pluto and Charon are sometimes referred to as a “double dwarf planet” binary system.

Charon orbits Pluto every 6.4 Earth days, with an orbital speed of 0.21 to 0.23 km/s, which, in the scale of the Solar System, is quite slow. The distance from the Sun to Charon is also remarkable, with an average measurement of 5.9 billion km. Sometimes with distance and numbers like these, it’s easier to accept it and move on.


Charon has a huge fracture system, unlike anything seen on Pluto. NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute

Much like Voyager 2 providing information about Triton, New Horizons‘ flyby in 2015 has gifted humanity with some extraordinary information, data, and images of Pluto’s largest moon. That’s all well and good, but is there anything else we could learn about Charon? Be careful what you wish for.

Let’s talk about Charon’s geology. Its age is believed to be around 4.5 billion years old, but to be honest, it doesn’t look a million years over 3.8 billion. The surface is very active, and is covered with water ice, canyons, carters, and some pretty gnarly names of surface features. These include, but are not limited to, Tardis Chasma, Nostromo Chasma, Kirk, Organa, Ripley, Tintin, Skywalker, Spock, Sulu, Vader, Kurbrick Mons, Gallifrey Macula, Vulcan Planitia, and, of course, the Neverland Regio, which was formerly nicknamed, Mordor Macula.

Charon’s polar cap, the Neverland Regio, is famous for being a massive reddish-brown area at its north pole. This region is made up of tholins, which are dark organic compounds. The colour comes from methane escaping from Pluto, which becomes trapped at Charon’s cold and dark pole during its decades-long winter. During this time, this methane is transformed into red, complex hydrocarbons by solar wind and ultraviolet radiation.

Other equally cool facts about Charon are:

  • Charon is believed to be too small to sustain a permanent atmosphere, but it does have a crazy 120° axial tilt.
  • Because Charon is mutually tidally locked with Pluto, it shares Pluto’s 248-year orbit around the Sun.
  • Each season on Charon can last over 60 years.
  • The average surface temperature is roughly -230°C, while during winter, it can drop even further to -258°C.
  • Evidence on Charon’s surface suggests it had ancient cryovolcanic activity.

Charon is a curious little ice ball, but it is still part of our family, and we love it. What is your favourite fact about Charon? As always, please let me know.

I appreciate you continuing to join me on this fascinating tour. The narration is pathetic, but the views are amazing. Thank you for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. My Twitter and Mastodon accounts are still active, pumping out non-award-winning content daily; you should check them out.

Please remember to walk your dog, read a banned book, don’t bomb schools, and I’ll see you next week for the Six Nations winners update. Stop it, I know you love it.


 

Is it possible to review a movie without ever watching it?

Using the way-back machine, let’s travel back to 2022, where I wrote about various reviews of two television shows that I hadn’t seen at the time. I thought it was overdue to revisit this concept, but instead of writing about another television show, we’re going to look at a movie. This sounds like another excellent idea, like fire-proof matches, or ejector seats in helicopters.

We are spoiled for choice, as we are surrounded by a collection of motion pictures, whether they are shown at the cinema or through various streaming services. What an age to live in!

However, considering her spouse, the U.S. president, the Board of Peace chairman, the winner of the inaugural FIFA Peace Prize, the recent recipient of a hand-me-down Nobel Peace Prize, and convicted felony, Donald Trump, has been busy bombing Iran, I thought it would be fitting to look at Melania Trump’s movie, Melania.

Let’s establish something first. I can think of no conceivable reason why I would ever watch, Melania. Seriously, I don’t want to watch it. If I were on a long-haul flight, and I had no book, with the movie stuck on repeat, then maybe. A big maybe.

So, how does someone review a movie that they have no intention of ever watching? The answer is very simple; I read what other people have said. I had a staff meeting about this subject, and the consensus was that we should try to be fair and neutral. However, sometimes we can be biased, and today is one of those days.

Melania premiered on 29th January 2026, with a budget of US$40 million, and has made US$16.6 million worldwide, which technically makes it a flop. From what I understand, the film covers Melania’s movements and experiences around the last 20 days leading up to the second inauguration of everybody’s favourite president, Donald Trump. Sounds action-packed stuff, right?

And with that, let’s make it so!


‘Melania’ movie posters vandalized across LA. Credit: Fox 11 News

I enjoy reading humorous reviews as much as the next person, so this was a fun experience for me, unlike smelling an open bag of Sour Cream and Chives from 500 m away. Gross.

Because you demand nothing but the best from this wayward literary venture, I have collected some of the funniest reviews for Melania and have tried to group them accordingly, because I can, and it looks neat. Also, I am aware of review bombing, so thank you in advance for the heads up.

Rotten Tomatoes: (Accurate for 5th March 2026)

11% Tomatometer

98% Audience Score


Coleman Spilde: Salon.com 7th February 2026

This documentary doesn’t absolve any sins; it highlights them. “Melania” taunts the viewer and takes glee in the assumption that they can’t do anything about it.


Joseph Robinson: Fish Jelly Films (YouTube) 6th February 2026

More PR campaign than personal portrait, Melania is an astonishingly dull documentary that masquerades as a glamorous immigrant story while offering little insight beyond carefully curated image-making.


Robert Denerstein: Denerstein Unleashed 4th February 2026

By any critical standards I’m familiar with, I’ll tell you that Melania isn’t much of a documentary; it’s more like a plush Life Styles of the Rich and Famous episode that bleeds into a chorus of booming triumphalism centering on Trump’s inauguration.


Amy Nicholson: Los Angeles Times 3rd February 2026

Melania” plays like a sizzle reel for her post-political (post-spousal?) future career in which she may rouse herself to be a guest judge on a reality competition show.


Calum Cooper: Cinerama Film 3rd February 2026

Melania is shambolic, putrid, pitiful garbage: A brazen, awkward, irredeemable infomercial that ignores truth and scrutiny in favour of performative humility. It’s not just wretched – it’s offensive to the collective intelligence of the human race.


Donald Clarke: Irish Times 31st January 2026

No good impression emerges of the former Slovenian model. No bad impression emerges either. Ratner’s film achieves, rather, a sort of passive distance – as you might get by pointing a camera, for close to two hours, at a waterfall or a wheat field.


IMDb: (Accurate for 5th March 2026)

1.4/10 rating

Sleepin_Dragon: 1/10 rating 30th January 2026

I can’t pretend I sat through this to the end. There was only so much I could take, and as we left the cinema, the screen itself was empty. That probably says everything I need to say about this dire ….movie.


meltymark: 1/10 rating 30th January 2026

I’m not a political person, politics are disgusting to me on both sides of the isle and I understand Melania is not a politician and deserves some respect and dignity like all other people… but

This was not only boring, but it was also incredibly painful to watch. It reminded me of the feeling you get when a boss or person in authority is bragging about themselves and you have to just take it and act like it doesn’t repulse you and your body language and whole being just can’t take it to the point of it making you physically ill.


andrew-lundberg-1970: 1/10 rating 31st January 2026

Everything about this film is pure tragedy, and not in a meaningful or intentional way. It’s dull, self-important, and completely devoid of insight, as if it mistakes moodiness for depth and emptiness for sophistication. The pacing drags, the storytelling goes nowhere, and whatever point it thinks it’s making never arrives. If I could give it less than one star, I would. Don’t waste your time, your money, or your patience on this hollow mess.


mbvqp: 1/10 rating 1st February 2026

Melania” is an utter WASTE OF TIME and MONEY-hands down the WORST MOVIE I’ve ever seen. Its disjointed plot, uninspired performances, and cringeworthy ridiculous dialogue make it a tedious chore to sit through. Rather than offering insight, it delivers a bland, utterly uninspiring experience that adds absolutely nothing to the broader discourse. Please do yourself an enormous favour and SKIP THIS DISASTER entirely. You’ll be glad that you did!


rppratings: 1/10 rating 5th February 2026

Melania is less of a movie and more of a painfully long exercise in boredom. Calling it hollow would be generous – this film is a glossy, lifeless shell with absolutely nothing inside. It drags, it stalls, it goes nowhere, and somehow still feels longer than its runtime. Watching paint dry would’ve delivered more emotional payoff.

The “story,” if you can even call it that, is buried under endless slow shots, awkward silence, and a level of stiffness that makes mannequins look expressive. Every moment that should feel revealing or meaningful instead feels cold, staged, and completely devoid of humanity. It’s not mysterious – it’s empty.

The dialogue is flat, the pacing is brutal, and the entire thing feels like a stretched-out PR video nobody asked for. By the end, I wasn’t frustrated, I wasn’t moved – I was just stunned that something so expensive-looking could be so painfully pointless.

Melania isn’t just bad – it’s spectacularly, monumentally dull. A beautiful wrapper around absolutely nothing. A total waste of time.


JoshuaT-253: 1/10 rating 19th February 2026

There is nothing harder to describe than a movie that is simply dull and uninteresting. I could sit here and describe how nothing happens for close to 80% of the time. Just a lady sitting around waiting for things to happen. She then travels from place to place multiple times in great and tedious detail with nothing to show for it than more waiting to travel to yet another place. It has almost zero content, nothing to hold interest or to connect with at all.


Other sources:

Xan Brooks: The Guardian

30th January 2026

…No doubt there is a great documentary to be made about Melania Knauss, the ambitious model from out of Slovenia who married a New York real-estate mogul and then found herself cast in the role of a latter-day Eva Braun, but the horrific Melania emphatically isn’t it. It’s one of those rare, unicorn films that doesn’t have a single redeeming quality. I’m not even sure it qualifies as a documentary, exactly, so much as an elaborate piece of designer taxidermy, horribly overpriced and ice-cold to the touch and proffered like a medieval tribute to placate the greedy king on his throne.


Natasha Jokic: BuzzFeed

31st January 2026

Last night, I left an empty chickpea can on my counter. When I came back 30 minutes later, small, black bugs had swarmed the tin and were crawling over my sink. I would rather relive that moment a hundred times over than have to watch another minute of the movie Melania.


Lauren Collins: The New Yorker

Cameras followed Melania in the twenty days leading up to Trump’s second Inauguration. About nineteen of them seem to have been devoted to planning Melania’s big event, a candlelit dinner for MAGA backers and bagmen, including Bezos. Chef Chris’s menu opens with a “golden egg and caviar,” an event planner says. At this point, you think that “Melania” has broken the fourth wall, that the far-too-obvious symbolism is about to be acknowledged and then punctured or dismissed. But, no, the gilded hors d’œuvres are for real, even if, as a metaphor, they are at best incomplete. With “Melania,” you get the brittle shell, but none of the rich internal goo that makes for a compelling portrait.


Piper B.: Common Sense Media

February 2026

People will tell you to remember that this is just a documentary and that’s why it’s boring, but that’s just plain wrong. This documentary shows no historical value other than “my husband became the president.” I would not show this to my children because I see no role model. If I want to show my kids a documentary, I’d choose one with a more empowering figure, someone they can look up to and strive to be.


Amy Nicholson: The Los Angeles Times

2nd February 2026

I cannot recommend “Melania” as a good movie or even an interesting one. It has the feel of a soothingly looped AI screen saver, a trance-inducing spell where nothing matters so long as your high heels aren’t hurting your feet. Yet against all odds, there is a truth in her SUV-to-tarmac-to-SUV-to-tarmac insularity. Future historians will be glad to have “Melania” as a lens into this moment in time. Like everything she touches, it’s a costly artifact.


Owen Gleiberman: Variety

30th January 2026

Melania is a documentary that never comes to life. It’s a “portrait” of the First Lady of the United States, but it’s so orchestrated and airbrushed and stage-managed that it barely rises to the level of a shameless infomercial. Is it cheesy? At moments, but mostly it’s inert. It feels like it’s been stitched together out of the most innocuous outtakes from a reality show. There’s no drama to it. It should have been called “Day of the Living Tradwife.


Vince Mancini: GQ

2nd February 2026

Melania many go down in history as one of the least revealing documentaries ever made. But if you’ve never watched the First Lady get on and off a plane, Brett Ratner’s got a movie for you.


Samuel Clench: News.com.au

1st February 2026

Melania is like a horror film with nothing scary in it, or a crime thriller with no twists, or an action film with no fighting. It is a documentary with no interest in exploring its central figure beneath her most superficial level. It is incomprehensibly empty.


But I think the best review I have discovered is this:

Greg: Cockbuster Video

30 January 2026

Couldn’t hear what the hell was going on during the film because the whole theater was filled with dudes in red hats sucking each other off load af.


Now, in the interests of being fair, not every single Melania review is negative; some, in fact, praise the film. Different strokes for different folks, though. Should you watch the film or give it a pass? I would give it a hard pass, not even to watch it, to decry it.

It goes for a general rule of thumb for any comic, book, movie, TV show, computer game, music, chip flavour or documentary; don’t listen to anybody else’s review or opinion. If you want to experience a product, go and experience it yourself; that way, you’ll always know. If you like it, then praise the living hell out of it; if not, then go the other way.

To quote one of the 90’s greatest arse-kickers, “The power is yours!”

And that, dear friends, brings another jam-packed blog post filled with mystery to a close. Also, regardless of what happens with Trump’s non-war with Iran, Iran is due to play all of its group games of the FIFA World Cup in the United States, with the first game against us, New Zealand, on 15th June. Who knows if Trump will let them into the country or if there will be a boycott? Who knows?

Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Please don’t forget to walk your dog, read a banned book, go watch The Creator, and I’ll see you next week.


Who wants a Parkrun?

It’s nice to be reassured that the important things in this crazy old world never change; Jonathan Pie keeps holding back on telling us how he really feels; Donald Trump has exonerated himself; and New Zealand’s second most popular conspiracy theorist, Brian Tamaki, is still fighting against non-Christian immigration. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

I’ve been meaning to write about Parkrun for the last few months, and this week’s blog post has been rewarded with that honour. Yay. I’ve written some truly inspiring blog posts about running, so it’s a wonder you haven’t read or heard about them. What’s that? You haven’t? Oh, never mind, nobody is perfect, except for Chuck Norris.

And with that hard-hitting introduction, let’s embark on a journey of self-discovery and punishment, as only those who suffer through running can truly understand.

SPOILER: This is not a paid advertisement. I’m not popular enough for any of that.


Credit: Parkrun

If you’re like me and walk around completely oblivious to the things other people take for granted, you may have never heard of Parkrun. Until August 2025, I had never either. It wasn’t until our small free community weekly newspaper was advertising it, that I took notice of it.

So, Scott, spit it out. What is Parkrun? No, it’s not a new name with Generation Alpha children that’s trending; far from it. Parkrun is a fun run, though some people believe the words “fun” and “run” should never be in the same sentence. Basically, Parkrun is a weekly 5 km fun run that is managed by volunteers for walkers and runners.

And that’s another blog post for another week. Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Please don’t forget to walk…as if.

Parkrun was introduced in the United Kingdom in 2004 by Paul Sinton-Hewitt, but now has spread to over 26 countries, with over 10 million participants. As I said earlier, it is run by volunteers who organise the weekly 5 km runs, which are timed events for walkers and runners.

There are over 2,000 locations worldwide and over 60 locations in good, old New Zealand. I feel rather special because, as I said earlier, I had never heard of Parkrun until last year. I was only 21 years late, which is quite good for me. I’m planning on ditching dial-up internet soon, because this broadband thing seems to be popular.

Anyway, my town has a Parkrun, and wouldn’t you know it, the circuit is 5 km. Well, to be honest, I don’t know if the course is exactly 5 km, but the course consists of three laps, so maybe the course is a few metres off, but what’s five metres between friends? If you haven’t done Parkrun before, I can explain what it’s like, though I haven’t been to another course.

During the summer months, the run starts at 8 am, which is a shock to the system for a Saturday. I only live a 15-minute walk from the course, so that’s (un)lucky. Before the run starts, there’s always a meeting for the first timers, where they run through what to expect and how it operates.

The deal is that it’s free to run; however, since it’s a timed event, you need a barcode that allows your time to be recorded. To secure one, you go to the Parkrun website and register your details. You’re given a barcode, where you can download it to your phone, or, as I did, print it off and carry it in your pocket.

You can invest in other options like cards and wristbands, but they all cost. Since my barcode is looking very tatty and battered, I may one day save up for a wristband. Sadly, I’m not cool enough for that yet. Sorry, I’m like a middle-aged geek at a library, I get distracted too much. Focus, Scott, get back on track. The barcode works like this: at the finish of the race, and if you want to have an official time, you run through the chute.

People are recording the time as you cross the line, and then there will be someone handing out tokens with a barcode on them. The next step is crucial, as I usually give the people the wrong item. You will have two items in your hands now: your barcode, in whatever form that takes (print for me), and a plastic token.

At the end of the chute, there will be a third group of people waiting for you. You will give them your barcode to be scanned, and they will return it to you once this is done. Next, you will hand over the plastic token for scanning; however, you will not get this token back, as it will be recycled for the following week.

Since the run is only 5 km, runners and walkers of all abilities start at the same time, which means everyone is competing at once. The final step is to wait for the results. I believe you receive the results via email in under 90 minutes. However, for me, it’s a hollow victory.

The results contain several pieces of information

  • Your official race time (Also, if this time was your new personal best).
  • The total number of races you have competed in.
  • The number of races you have competed in at that venue.
  • Your overall placing against all of the competitors.
  • Your overall placing against all of the competitors in your gender group.
  • Your placing overall against all of the competitors in your gender and age group.

These results are a great way to gauge your progress each week, but there’s one key statistic that I haven’t discussed. Along with the others, there is an age-graded score, which is a percentage. All of the other statistics made sense, and I could understand them, but not the age-graded score. I made the mistake of clicking on the link that would explain it.

All parkrun events use age grading to allow parkrunners to compare results. Age grading takes your time and uses the world record time for your gender and age to produce a score (a percentage).

Age Grades are calculated to allow rough comparisons between our participants, and should not be taken too seriously. For example, age grading makes no allowance for different weather conditions or the varying terrains of our courses.

We do not share the actual table used to perform the calculations but it is loosely based on the tables produced by WMA, previously known as WAVA.

Finally parkrun age grade values are based on established, international proxy metrics, which are currently only available for male and female categories. Should a participant select “prefer not to say” or “another gender identity”, gender-related data will be absent.

In other words, your effort is graded against elite local, national, and international athletes. No matter how amazing your run was, even with the other finishing results, scoring under 60% humbles you a lot. Also, it’s a hell of a thing to have a 60-year-old woman and a 10-year-old boy pass you. It really builds up your self-esteem and confidence.

I find it interesting when you get to expect particular people to pass you each week, when you’ve been there enough times. Sometimes they pass me on the third lap, and I feel I’m doing well. However, the opposite is true when they pass me on the first lap, and I feel instantly defeated. Yay.

For a free weekly event, Parkrun is fast becoming a staple in my life, and even though each week you are racing against other runners, and of course, yourself, I’m still enjoying it. And in this topsy-turvy world, finding something that challenges you and makes you happy, for whatever reasons, can’t be a bad thing. If you haven’t tried Parkrun, once again, do yourself a favour and give it a go.

Have you done Parkrun before? What are your thoughts? As always, please let me know.

Thanks again for reading, following, and subscribing to Some Geek Told Me. Please don’t forget to walk your dog, read a banned book, watch the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup semi-finals (Go, New Zealand!) and final, and I’ll see you next week for the review of a movie I never want to see.